Kenneth Wimer wrote:
> I propose Friday evening at 20 UTC in #ubuntu-art on freenode...sound good?
Unfortunately I can't attend this Friday or Saturday at evening time. If
Thursday isn't too early and suits others, that would be better.
m.
--
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.co
Cory K. wrote:
> Can you point us to a relevant Devian ML thread or anything?
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/113889 is the needs-packaging
bug, with links to the Debian bug and ML discussion.
m.
--
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/lis
> I don't know if we can change it but we can surely use the "liberation
> fonts" by Red Hat that are nice and free:
>
> https://www.redhat.com/promo/fonts/
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/113889
Apparently the license used by Red Hat adds some exceptions to the GPL,
which caused them t
On Sat, 2008-02-02 at 17:39 -0800, Sumit Chandra Agarwal wrote:
> Could Ubuntu be configured to intelligently only add the applet if there
> is more than one user registered to the system?
There's a bug report about this; you may want to subscribe to it:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+sour
On Fri, 2008-02-15 at 12:40 +0100, Kenneth Wimer wrote:
> 6) Using a clear looks theme instead of ubuntu looks: It does not look like
> we
> will be able to get the needed changes upstream
What exactly are these changes?
--
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.u
On Sat, 2008-02-16 at 01:21 +0100, Kenneth Wimer wrote:
> the removal of the line between the toolbars.
>
> the biggest differences that I see which I really think still need to
> be
> looked into are the scroll bars and the highlight of the menu's (which
> look
> much nicer in ubuntu-looks). W
I've just noticed when filing a bug in the human-icon-theme package that
it has no bug contact set. This should mean that nobody gets alerted
about bugs filed in the package, unless they're subscribed to its bug
feed. Also, the artwork team is not set as a bug contact for
ubuntu-artwork; only Mark
On Sat, 2009-04-11 at 23:01 -0400, Cory K. wrote:
> This is pretty much done now AFAIK.
Do you have a link?
> I think to some degree, being a bit exclusionary might be a good thing.
> Why can't someone's inclusion on the team be based on some merit/metric.
> Not something I've really worked out
On Sat, 2009-04-11 at 23:39 -0400, Cory K. wrote:
> Yo! Murat! How are you? :)
Just moved a new house and poorer than ever..
> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Artwork#About%20the%20Artwork%20Team
>
> "The goal of the "Artwork Team" is to produce artwork for the
> /community/ side of Ubuntu."
I'm aware
