[ubuntu-art] Concept for Intrepid

Hi, I have been working on a theme for the next release, and I would appreciate feedback. It is a minimalistic theme, with a blended metacity theme based on Gilouche. The gtk theme requires the murrine engine. I personally use it with the GNOME-Human from the GNOME-Colors

Re: [ubuntu-art] gwd opacity set to "true"

Thank Cimi the Murrine dev, he clued me in when I asked about it in IRC :) 2008/6/21 Cory K. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Michael Stephenson wrote: > > Thanks Michael, > > When you are checking out the theme please will you enable in > > gconf-editor: /apps/gwd/metacit

Re: [ubuntu-art] Whats Up with This?

Have you actually used the theme? Your initial disgust at the colour scheme may subside if you actually used it and saw it in action, I know I love the theme. If the colour scheme isn't for you there will doubtless be many rehashes of this theme in lighter colour schemes. There is alot more to a t

Re: [ubuntu-art] Need gtkrc help. Panel effect for Studio theme.

Please Please Please, don't skin the panel, some (stupidly in my opinion) programs use it as a repeated background for some of their windows (such as the alacarte menu editor when you are editing the properties of a launcher), and it looks truly awful and incredibly unprofessional. I don't know thi

Re: [ubuntu-art] variation of Kin styling

2008/7/28 shadowh511 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > On Jul 27, 2008, at 11:44 PM, tonic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >>> I've been dabbling with my own variation on the Kin styling > >>> > >>> > http://picasaweb.google.com/ghatanothoa/CurrentProjects/photo#5227945564509952210 > >>> > >> > >> I go

Re: [ubuntu-art] Human 2 .deb

2008/7/28 shadowh511 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > On Jul 27, 2008, at 11:48 PM, SorinN <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > ok, > > > > now just imagine that I can't observe that. > > Emerald works OK - no memory / CPU overloaded. > > > > CPU is about 1 to 5 % with Emerald ..the same with Metacity >

Re: [ubuntu-art] More Mockups

2008/7/29 Salane Ashcraft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Would you please explain more what that affects? I saw on his website > (Andrea's) that he was working on that. > http://www.cimitan.com/murrine/rgba-support/list this list will show what is supported, to what extent, and what is not. -- ubuntu-art

Re: [ubuntu-art] art concept

2008/8/4 Matthew Nuzum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > There are a ton of icons. If you just want to make a subtle change you > can re-use the icons from another theme, but if you want to make a > radical change (like flat icons) then you need to make a bunch. This > takes a lot of ambition and a motivate

Re: [ubuntu-art] art concept

2008/8/4 Salane Ashcraft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > also Canonical had Iconforge create the human icons. Mark wants new > icons, but also wants to retain our identity aka orange/brown. > Well if that is the case then perhaps we can have a discussion on using the human-colors icons by perfectska04 http

Re: [ubuntu-art] Iconset ideas

2008/8/4 Cory K. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > While I think they are a fine set, I'd like to see a design direction > set 1st. These might not fit a style that we go for. Personally, I feel > we need to move away from the Tango look. > > -Cory K. >

Re: [ubuntu-art] Shiki-Colors

2008/8/8 Victor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > The most noticeable changes are: > -Menus/Menubars are light. While this takes a bit away from the original > appeal of the theme, it is much more compatible and way less buggy with > non-gtk apps (firefox 3). I personally would would rather you kept it as

Re: [ubuntu-art] Background Concept

2008/8/11 symon cadwallender <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Damn the link says the pic has been deleted. > I really really like these mockups. It can't be beat! Minus the Dock > though. > http://willwill100.deviantart.com/art/Interpid-Ibex-Mockup-Part-1-93584571 > http://willwill100.deviantart.com/art/

Re: [ubuntu-art] Theme engines

2008/8/11 George Kendros <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > The end theme is usually a function of the engine (unless you go with > pixmaps). > > Look at the specific widget examples further down the page, especially the > scrollbars. They're better than anything we have right now IMO. > Does anyone have a

Re: [ubuntu-art] What is the art team?

2008/9/11 Cory K. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Dylan McCall wrote: > >> Odysseus Flappington wrote: > >> > >>> I think just by slotting in the word 'community' into the definition, > >>> you're already implying that you aren't affiliated with Ubuntu > >>> officially, and have no decision making power in

Re: [ubuntu-art] What is the art team?

Well at the moment it is exactly how I described it, nothing more than voices on a mailing list, if that is what a community art team is, it isn't productive and is doomed to forever be a bunch of people chirping away in vain. Unless you or someone else provides an alternative structure to kick sta

Re: [ubuntu-art] What is the art team?

2008/9/12 Vadim Peretokin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Why is there a need? > > Here's how it works - art team provides themes, Canonical chooses. > > That won't change. > > So what change would you like? Have a boss who tells each artist what to do > or? > > -- > ubuntu-art mailing list > ubuntu-art@lis

Re: [ubuntu-art] What is the art team?

2008/9/12 Vadim Peretokin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > I see no clearly proposed solution except "something, I don't know what, > needs to be done!". > > By the way, mailing lists are how people cooperate on the Internet. Really. > It's been done so for decades even. > > -- > ubuntu-art mailing list > ub

Re: [ubuntu-art] What is the art team?

2008/9/12 Vadim Peretokin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sure, we can do it how other Ubuntu teams do. > > Non-members have their post delayed and only published when approved by an > admin. > > Is that what you were thinking of? (Probably no, but that's how other teams > work, and get along just fine) > >

Re: [ubuntu-art] What is the art team?

2008/9/12 Vadim Peretokin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Please do not straw man me, I subscribe to other mailing lists, non of them >> ubuntu and non are censored. I am not advocating that the mailing list >> should change, just that team should not be synonymous with the mailing >> list. >> > > > Well, t

Re: [ubuntu-art] Announcing Project Kyu-do-

"Kyūdō is the Japanese art of archery" Perhaps you should revise this line. archery is Universal and outdates any civilisation, many cultures consider archery part of their national identity and heritage, Korea for example takes archery very seriously and could be rather annoyed by this line. Kyūdō

Re: [ubuntu-art] ubuntu-art Digest, Vol 39, Issue 67

On Fri, 2008-09-26 at 20:16 +0800, symon cadwallender wrote: > Lol. What do you expect from Ubuntu. They will never have a good > theme, either will Gnome. Gnome havn't got the balls to do it, Go Kde. > Im so sick of Ubuntu and Gnome and their 1980's mentality that i just > switched to Opensuse/Man

Re: [ubuntu-art] Kyūdō: Audience and Message

2008/9/27 Joshua Booth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > There are only seven movie editors I can find. Cinelerra may be > professional, but it has nowhere near the potential that the easy interface > of Windows Movie Maker had. The only thing that is Gnome-based and that > seems to have a nice interface is K

Re: [ubuntu-art] Kyūdō: Audience and Message

> > > FYI Kino is KDE based, not Gnome based. > Disregard that, I am an idiot the K always threw me. -- ubuntu-art mailing list ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art

Re: [ubuntu-art] intrepid update

So we can safely assume that the human-theme package is representative of the final look of Intrepid? -- ubuntu-art mailing list ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art

Re: [ubuntu-art] Canonical's approach to Jaunty

2008/11/4 Adam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > rhythmbox and nautilus or totem, or openoffice which is the ugliest thing > ever. > > What do people expect from totem? its a media player, it has a viewing window play/pause, skip forwards and skip backwards and volume, how do you jazz that up without adding

Re: [ubuntu-art] Canonical's approach to Jaunty

I can't see how you could use up some of the wasted space without adding redundant buttons, perhaps making the control buttons central would make it appear as if less space was being wasted? I'd need to see a mockup of a better totem to be convinced it needs work. -- ubuntu-art mailing list ubuntu

Re: [ubuntu-art] Art opinions

2008/11/27 SorinN <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > ..to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > I don't know why you like to tease peoples ? I see that before. > If he ..top-post, tell him normally something like : - hey man please > don't top post, we try to keep clean here. > > It's enough. > Don't forget Ubuntu is all in

Re: [ubuntu-art] Art opinions

2008/11/28 Cory K. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Michael Stephenson wrote: > > I agree with SorinN. Cory, evidently you are a very upfront, > > confrontational guy, and that's good, but there comes to a point where > > you are just plain rude. > > Rude is an opinion

Re: [ubuntu-art] Art opinions

2008/11/28 Cory K. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Michael Stephenson wrote: > > https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-art/2008-September/007923.html > > "As de-facto community lead atm I wanna give this effort a big +1." > > > > Sounds like you were taki

Re: [ubuntu-art] Art opinions

Sorry about last night, I got sucked into replying to defend my position, which I have very little personal interest in. My opinion was not that top posting is good, behaviours of people not following netiquette should of course be corrected, just that you can chastise and be rude to people while s

Re: [ubuntu-art] [Breathe] applications-internet

2008/12/9 spg76 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > I uploaded to the wiki icons for applications-internet. > https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Artwork/BreatheIconSet/Submissions > > -- > Seba (AKA spg76) > http://www.ubuntu-ar.org > > -- > ubuntu-art mailing list > ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com > https://lists.ubuntu.com/

Re: [ubuntu-art] background?

2009/1/16 Erik Thiem > I have created a background that I would like to have considered for use in > Jaunty. It is available at > http://picasaweb.google.com/sccrules94/UbuntuArtwork#5291938064321527394 > > -erik > > -- > ubuntu-art mailing list > ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com > https://lists.ubunt

Re: [ubuntu-art] [Breathe] archive-insert-directory

2009/1/21 Jake Tolbert > I added a new icon to the Breathe icon submissions > page: > archive-insert-directory. > > Clearly, the scale is wrong in relation to the other icons--I need to fix > that. I used element from the Oxygen version

Re: [ubuntu-art] Ubuntu Countdown Banner

2009/3/25 Matthew Nuzum > 2009/3/25 John Baer : > > Jaunty Beta is out tomorrow, what is the status of the count down > > banner? > > > > If you were on the web presence team mailing list you'd know, but > since you're not you'll have to wait until tomorrow to find out. But, > the good news is, t

Re: [ubuntu-art] Ubuntu Wallpaper Photo Pack

> I would say that with both Hardy and Intrepid the way mascots was > included in the artwork was truly art and worked out fantastically. I'm just guessing but I imagine that decision was Jaunty specific, You can draw a Heron and a Ibex, and majestic and element animals. Whereas whichever way you

Re: [ubuntu-art] Regarding my icons and igorance

I thought it was a good icon, and potentially a very nice ubuntu-studio icon, but not fitting with the breathe set. It's a fun and cute icon, I would not describe breathe as fun and cute. A good basis for an alternate ubuntu-studio set. My opinion isn't worth anything, but you were looking for some

Re: [ubuntu-art] Regarding my icons and ignorance

2009/5/7 Cory K. : > Baldur Pétursson Blöndal wrote: Hello, I'm a bit of a newcomer although I've been reading this mailing-list for quite some time now I'm not completely sure how this works though (I'm not ever sure about using a mailing-list) so please be kind :) could a