2008/7/26 Ken Vermette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I'm not entirely sure about the direction Kin and Kith are taking,
> especially with the whole OSX smackdown - so I'm trying something new with
> the themes, posting mockups of the new directions the theme could go
> flailing into. When I hit something
Now THIS is what I've been looking for in a new Ubuntu theme. Beautiful
work, keep it up, and let's hope it's noticed!
On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 11:27 AM, Duncan Austin
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
>
> 2008/7/26 Ken Vermette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> I'm not entirely sure about the direction Kin and Ki
Il giorno dom, 27/07/2008 alle 15.42 +0200, Nicholas
Ipsen(Sephiroth_VII) ha scritto:
> Now THIS is what I've been looking for in a new Ubuntu theme.
> Beautiful work, keep it up, and let's hope it's noticed!
>
>
>
> On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 11:27 AM, Duncan Austin
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
this might sound like a stupid question, but why have we switched to emerald?
--
Ubuntu FTW!
--
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art
i can explain
the mail program has a signature feature.
you were seeing my UNERASEABLE signature.
in addition, I am using an ipod touch for my general computing to save
gobs of power. ITS MY WAY OF BEING GREEN!
now if i could use it with ubuntu...
--
Ubuntu FTW!
--
ubuntu-art mailing list
fight coporate designs with home-brewed eye-candy :)
On 7/27/08, Mario Viviani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Il giorno dom, 27/07/2008 alle 15.42 +0200, Nicholas
> Ipsen(Sephiroth_VII) ha scritto:
>> Now THIS is what I've been looking for in a new Ubuntu theme.
>> Beautiful work, keep it up, and
sorry, basic html gmail is very bad about top-posting
--
Ubuntu FTW!
--
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art
Well, you don't have to use it, but emerald certainly is somewhat more
powerful than GDM .
On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 7:05 PM, shadowh511 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> this might sound like a stupid question, but why have we switched to
> emerald?
>
> --
> Ubuntu FTW!
>
> --
> ubuntu-art mailing lis
Am 26.07.2008 22:50:03 schrieb(en) Ken Vermette:
> I'm not entirely sure about the direction Kin and Kith are taking,
> especially with the whole OSX smackdown - so I'm trying something new
> with
> the themes, posting mockups of the new directions the theme could go
> flailing into. When I hit som
On Sun, 2008-07-27 at 10:05 -0700, shadowh511 wrote:
> this might sound like a stupid question, but why have we switched to emerald?
Adding to that question: /When/ did we switch to Emerald? Are the
developers with capacity to implement this change aware that we want to
switch window decorators? W
The development of emerald is discontinued since some time now. (more
than a year I think) I see that it's ridiculously easy to make fancy
themes with emerald, but you just shouldn't do it. There isn't a
replacement for emerald yet and nobody knows when this successor will
be ready and if it will s
The compiz guys are working on a new decorator called Jasper i think.
Url:
http://jbosveld.blogspot.com/2008/05/i-have-seen-couple-posts-on-forums.html
--
José Luis Ricón <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu
> A short-term solution could be to convert emerald themes to metacity
> themes. But that's really a lot of work, since you would need to
> reimplement every emerald 'engine' in a metacity theme.
Emerald is easy to use to create themes. It is a fantastic tool for
prototyping and testing an idea q
On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 2:01 PM, Kim Kahns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Am 26.07.2008 22:50:03 schrieb(en) Ken Vermette:
> > I'm not entirely sure about the direction Kin and Kith are taking,
> > especially with the whole OSX smackdown - so I'm trying something new
> > with
> > the themes, posting
Am 28.07.2008 02:31:11 schrieb(en) Ken Vermette:
>
> Aside from firefox (because you can create themes for it) Openoffice
> could
> simply not have a dark toolbar, simply looking like any window that
> doesn't
> have one of its own.
>
There is no way to do that other than launching openoffice wi
On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 8:41 PM, Kim Kahns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Am 28.07.2008 02:31:11 schrieb(en) Ken Vermette:
> >
> > Aside from firefox (because you can create themes for it) Openoffice
> > could
> > simply not have a dark toolbar, simply looking like any window that
> > doesn't
> > ha
man shadowh511 -> peoples just ask here for * or for ..other *.. ;)
being a discussion list they had all rights to do that and it's normal
to be that way.
for example Kim told us about the progress of his theme. Which are
interested in emerald aspect of life, will test new the new deb and
will p
I've been dabbling with my own variation on the Kin styling
http://picasaweb.google.com/ghatanothoa/CurrentProjects/photo#5227945564509952210
cheers,
Tonic
--
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art
On Jul 27, 2008, at 11:00 PM, SorinN <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> man shadowh511 -> peoples just ask here for * or for ..other *.. ;)
> being a discussion list they had all rights to do that and it's normal
> to be that way.
>
> for example Kim told us about the progress of his theme. Which a
On Jul 27, 2008, at 11:29 PM, tonic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've been dabbling with my own variation on the Kin styling
>
> http://picasaweb.google.com/ghatanothoa/CurrentProjects/photo#5227945564509952210
>
> cheers,
>Tonic
>
>
> --
> ubuntu-art mailing list
> ubuntu-art@lists.ubunt
> > I've been dabbling with my own variation on the Kin styling
> >
> > http://picasaweb.google.com/ghatanothoa/CurrentProjects/photo#5227945564509952210
> >
>
> I got 404'd
>
odd :(
attached it since its small enough anyway.
cheers,
Tonic
<>--
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists
ok,
now just imagine that I can't observe that.
Emerald works OK - no memory / CPU overloaded.
CPU is about 1 to 5 % with Emerald ..the same with Metacity
2008/7/28 shadowh511 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>
>
>
> On Jul 27, 2008, at 11:00 PM, SorinN <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> man shadowh511 -> p
22 matches
Mail list logo
