> "You are ready to proceed if you can clearly and concisely
> define the following:
> 1 - The client.
Mark Shuttleworth.
> 2 - The audience.
Linux noobs.
> 3 - The message.
Ubuntu is brown, easy to use and completely awesome.
> 4 - The client's motivation.
I'm a great guy.
> 5 - The audience'
On Jan 8, 2008 1:37 AM, Dylan McCall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That doesn't stop people from enabling the shadow themselves, unfortunately,
> but window decorations shouldn't be Compiz's business anyway.
>
What, if not the Window Manager, do you think should be repsonsible
for window decoration
hi Ken,
do you have the SVG available for the 0.3 theme? i see the link is
broken on the wiki and it can't be readily downloaded using other means
due to SSL restrictions.
i'd like to have a play with it if possible, as i'm sure others may too.
cheers,
--
julian oliver
http://julianoliver.c
That's actually the way clearlooks comes out of the box. I just adjusted the
color inside the engine to highlight the apps/places/system with the normal bg
color instead of orange.
I wonder if the engine could draw the tab/menu combo as one widget and compiz
would recognize it and draw the
>> 1 - The client.
> Mark Shuttleworth.
I'm not so sure is Mark itself agree with this position - He wants to
give something to others not to itself. I'm afraid that Ubuntu is right
now a public person and a common value for some millions of human
entities. Being open source I'm in doubt if
On Tue, 2008-01-08 at 00:59 +0100, Kenneth Wimer wrote:
> I think that you should rotate the bug to align the vertical with the top
> right arrow, just an idea. Great work, really nice!
I figured the bug is most recognisable in vertical orientation plus this
avoids emphasising one of the triangl
*Terminator* - https://launchpad.net/terminator
-Terminator, multiple terminals in one window. This is a little project
to produce an efficient way of filling a large area of screen space with
terminals.
"The robot future of terminals."
This is a project started by our very own Canonical sysadm
Rats, I went and used an already-taken term! I mean to say that Compiz
shouldn't be blindly drawing shadows, when they are in its preferences.
Details like that should be controlled by the theme.
Bye,
-Dylan
On Jan 8, 2008 6:31 AM, xl cheese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That's actually the way c
Just to make sure we're all on the same page. We are looking to find a way to
draw the menubarItem and menu as one object. See pic in the link
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Artwork/Incoming/Hardy/Alternate/Union?action=AttachFile&do=get&target=C__Documents+and+Settings_whayslip_My+Documents_My+Pictu
On 08/01/2008, xl cheese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> That's actually the way clearlooks comes out of the box. I just adjusted
> the color inside the engine to highlight the apps/places/system with the
> normal bg color instead of orange.
>
> I wonder if the engine could draw the tab/menu combo
Perhaps we can reuse the code that draws the gtkNotebook.
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Artwork/Incoming/Hardy/Alternate/Union?action=AttachFile&do=get&target=C__Documents+and+Settings_whayslip_My+Documents_My+Pictures_twf.png
> Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2008 17:40:56 +0100> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> To:
A menu is a new XWindow. Compiz draws a shadow around it, because it does
this with all windows. I think it will be difficult to tell Compiz the
position of the menubaritem. Unfortunately this is a completely different
case then a GtkNotebook.
On Jan 8, 2008 6:06 PM, xl cheese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
What if we eliminate the menu's transparency and somehow force the panel to
be drawn at a higher z-index than the menu? Is that possible? That would
make the panel cover up the shadow we need to eliminate.
Either way this effect is money, and I really hope we can figure it out.
Corey
On Jan 8,
Good modern theme
2008/1/7, julian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> ..on Sun, Jan 06, 2008 at 10:22:08PM -0800, shadowh511 wrote:
> > Hello,
> > We need to stop messing around and all start working on one theme. We
> > should start with union.
> > Why? you might ask, Why not Theme Q?
> > Union is the mos
It is not good for me, i prefere 20UTC or 21UTC...
could you give me the link to the forum (because i change my computer for
xmass and i forget it, thanks.
2008/1/7, Kenneth Wimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Thorsten,
>
> Very nice agenda, thanks for the wrap up! I think that we can take this
> for a
Good and simple theme
2008/1/7, Andrew Laignel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> I have pretty much completed my theme mockup, and quite like the way it
> looks now. Unfortunatley I am rather short on time and doubt I will be
> able to make a theme out of it myself. I would probably pick up
> development
Hi!
I'm working on a semi-realistic MeMaker theme and could use some
feedback. I have been staring so long at this ... somehow it seems to be
off but I can't quite put my finger on it.
http://thorwil.files.wordpress.com/2008/01/memaker_face_08.jpg
--
Thorsten Wilms
thorwil's design for free s
Hi,
I've just been stickybeaking at everyones mockups and this is the first that
has led me to comment.
I absolutely think it is the most elegant I've seen so far. I like that
there is more brown than orange and that the textures are all so smooth.
If I had even the slightest clue what I was doin
On Jan 8, 2008 12:43 PM, Corey Woodworth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What if we eliminate the menu's transparency and somehow force the panel to
> be drawn at a higher z-index than the menu? Is that possible? That would
> make the panel cover up the shadow we need to eliminate.
>
> Either way thi
19 matches
Mail list logo
