Hi all,
After spending the weekend with my family it has taken quite a while to figure
out exactly what is going on. Perhaps I should explain a few things.
First off, the version of the wallpaper inluded as default at this time will
change. It will be a version much closer to the lighter, less
Hi
I have been talking with kwwii about this on #ubuntu-art, and we need to
do something about how artwork is managed. #ubuntu-art decided that we
should try to have a meeting to find out how to handle this.
This will be a meta-debate, a meeting about the proscess. This will not
however be about
Hi all,
After spending the weekend with my family it has taken quite a while to figure
out exactly what is going on. Perhaps I should explain a few things.
First off, the version of the wallpaper inluded as default at this time will
change. It will be a version much closer to the lighter, less
On Monday 24 September 2007 13:25:11 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi
>
> I have been talking with kwwii about this on #ubuntu-art, and we need to
> do something about how artwork is managed. #ubuntu-art decided that we
> should try to have a meeting to find out how to handle this.
I propose Friday e
Kenneth Wimer wrote:
> I propose Friday evening at 20 UTC in #ubuntu-art on freenode...sound good?
Unfortunately I can't attend this Friday or Saturday at evening time. If
Thursday isn't too early and suits others, that would be better.
m.
--
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.co
Murat Gunes wrote:
Kenneth Wimer wrote:
I propose Friday evening at 20 UTC in #ubuntu-art on freenode...sound good?
Unfortunately I can't attend this Friday or Saturday at evening time. If
Thursday isn't too early and suits others, that would be better.
m.
Next week Friday/Satu
On Monday 24 September 2007 15:11:57 Martijn Bastiaan wrote:
> Murat Gunes wrote:
> > Kenneth Wimer wrote:
> >> I propose Friday evening at 20 UTC in #ubuntu-art on freenode...sound
> >> good?
> >
> > Unfortunately I can't attend this Friday or Saturday at evening time. If
> > Thursday isn't too ea
Any day on this week will be fine for me.
D.
Kenneth Wimer escribió:
> On Monday 24 September 2007 15:11:57 Martijn Bastiaan wrote:
>
>> Murat Gunes wrote:
>>
>>> Kenneth Wimer wrote:
>>>
I propose Friday evening at 20 UTC in #ubuntu-art on freenode...sound
good?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
> - Someone from the Forum Ambassadors team posts all incoming
> artwork to the forums - people comment on the incoming artwork, and
> are given a set of guidelines of constructive criticism -Those
> comments that are valid and useful by these guidelines are relayed
-- Forwarded message --
From: nothlit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sep 24, 2007 7:36 PM
Subject: Re: [ubuntu-art] Let one thousand flowers bloom
To: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Yes, as discussed on IRC. It seems theres a great perceptual divide,
as evidenced by the brouha
Hi,
Just a few suggestions on the three questions:
1. What is the problem today?
There is already a good community around artwork, but there are poor efforts to
coordinate human resources and a shortage of useful documentation. Some people
in the forums have already pointed out the process isn'
Normally you have to be a member of the list to post to the list. I allowed
this to go through so that nobody thinks I am secretly controlling things :p
...and now a few general comments which are not aimed directly at what you
have written nor should they be taken personally:
The top of the wi
Hey, thanks for taking the initiative to try to improve the process,
and for keeping your comments constructive.
Re: your concerns-- This time around we've further attempted to make
sure the process is more transparent, and to try to get more of the
community involved.
To this end, I've started a
Sorry, don't get me wrong, because I don't want to sound hash, but I
don't agree with the part that things were clear at the wiki. And also,
you are contradicting yourself.
If it was that clear you should have gotten proposals that matched the
criteria. You got things you didn't expect because the
Hi Damian,
On Monday 24 September 2007 23:37:43 Damian Vila wrote:
> Sorry, don't get me wrong, because I don't want to sound hash, but I
> don't agree with the part that things were clear at the wiki. And also,
> you are contradicting yourself.
Perhaps you are right on some points.
> If it was
Hi,
Thanks for your quick response. My apologies -- I am actually a member
of the list, but the email client's SMTP was set under another account
with the same email provider and I didn't realise it until the
auto-response arrived in another account.
First, to clarify: I am not accusing anyone
Hi Misosaki,
On Tuesday 25 September 2007 00:03:26 Misosaki wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for your quick response. My apologies -- I am actually a member
> of the list, but the email client's SMTP was set under another account
> with the same email provider and I didn't realise it until the
> auto-respo
Hey Nothlit, and thanks for responding. It's good to have a discussion
going.
nothlit wrote:
> In terms of documentation-frustration, it is unlikely (afaik, and feel
> free to correct me, those in the know) for any of the community
> artists' work, to be chosen as a default. The guidelines, are
One thing I forgot to add: the artwork dates are same as everything
else, there is no artwork specific timeline.
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/GutsyReleaseSchedule
However, right after this email I will add a link to the relevant wiki
page. TBH, afaik, its all freeform until the Beta Freeze.
But in terms
With respect to the recent debate about defaults and desktop
backgrounds, I thought I'd share an idea/opinion on how desktop
backgrounds, and maybe themes, could be chosen for inclusion in the
default package, and be chosen as default.
First off, I think that there needs to be a clear artwork requ
20 matches
Mail list logo
