On Mon, 2009-04-20 at 14:07 -0400, Cory K. wrote:
> Thorsten Wilms wrote:
> > On Mon, 2009-04-20 at 14:25 +0200, Kenneth Wimer wrote:
> >
> >> However, I do think that people need a place to start, find info,
> >> discuss, etc. How do we fill this gap?
> >>
> >
> > Wiki and forum?
>
> IMO,
Thorsten Wilms wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-04-20 at 14:25 +0200, Kenneth Wimer wrote:
>
>> However, I do think that people need a place to start, find info,
>> discuss, etc. How do we fill this gap?
>>
>
> Wiki and forum?
IMO, the unmoderated ubuntu-art-discuss list.
-Cory K.
--
ubuntu-art m
On Sun, 2009-04-19 at 21:52 -0400, John Baer wrote:
> My suggestion is to improve our processes. I would divide our
> submissions into categories. Submit to one, or submit to all. Categories
> would be bound to a series (e.g. Incoming/Karmic).
>
> * Backgrounds (e.g. Incoming/Karmic/Backgrounds)
On Mon, 2009-04-20 at 14:25 +0200, Kenneth Wimer wrote:
> However, I do think that people need a place to start, find info,
> discuss, etc. How do we fill this gap?
Wiki and forum?
> I do want to see things change, but I want to 1,000% certain that we
> are doing the right thing before we chang
t we need.
You might have already said this, but I wasn't sure because it wasn't too clear.
Regards,
Ben
From: Kenneth Wimer
To: ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
Sent: Monday, 20 April, 2009 14:55:52
Subject: Re: [ubuntu-art] Gettin' our @$$3$ in gear.
On Monday 20 April 2009 15:29:46 Ben Crisford wrote:
> >Right, there is a new moderated email list waiting to be used. Once we
> > know exactly what and how we want to use it, we can.
>
> I hope by moderated anyone can join, but is moderated?
Anyone can join by contributing to ubuntu artwork. Non-
. Once we know
>exactly what and how we want to use it, we can.
You mean that it will be run like the development list?
Regards,
Ben
From: Kenneth Wimer
To: ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
Sent: Monday, 20 April, 2009 13:25:06
Subject: Re: [ubuntu-art] Gettin'
Kenneth Wimer wrote:
> I do want to see things change, but I want to 1,000% certain that we
> are doing the right thing before we change *anything*.
>
>
> --
> Kenneth
The only way this is possible, is if we adopt a working policy from
someone else and then slowly organically mold it around our s
On Sunday 19 April 2009 18:52:47 Cory K. wrote:
> Apart from the title this email aims to take a no-holds-barred look at
> who we are and how we are put together.
>
> I have been looking at ways to give this team more structure and noticed
> something we lack in concrete leadership or anyone with a
I couldn't agree more.
As I said in an e-mail yesterday (which I fear no-one read :-/) it would be so
awkward to decide who gets in and who doesn't.
In my opinion the reason why we're so disorganised is because we have too many
contributors. Don't get me wrong, thats a great thing, but what i'
Its probably a good idea to have council created, if just to give direction
and create guidelines. The largest problem this team seems to have is a lack
of collective focus, everyone is attempting to develop something different
rather than looking at designs submitted and working together to develo
On Sun, Apr 19, 2009 at 12:52 PM, Cory K. wrote:
> 1. Clearing out the current LP art team and starting from zero. Closing
> it and making it a moderated team.
If nothing else, this really should be done. The LP team is basically
useless in its current state.
According to the members page we now
Kyle Family wrote:
> I am totally enthusiastic about a plan like this, if this is what it
> takes to get Ubuntu looking more "sophisticated." Because in my
> personal opinion, there are some very "amateur" things about Ubuntu
> (although I love the distro) mainly that being the graphical end.
I am totally enthusiastic about a plan like this, if this is what it
takes to get Ubuntu looking more "sophisticated." Because in my
personal opinion, there are some very "amateur" things about Ubuntu
(although I love the distro) mainly that being the graphical end. What
I would love to see
On Sun, Apr 19, 2009 at 9:53 PM, Thorsten Wilms wrote:
> * Cory K., because he kicks our @$$3$.
> * Sebastian Porta (though I bet he prefers to stay the most productive
> of all of us ;)
> * Anton Kerezov
> * Saleel
> * John Baer
> * (Rico Sta Cruz, if he ever comes back)
>
> Any additions
On Sun, 2009-04-19 at 12:52 -0400, Cory K. wrote:
> 3. Formation of a 5-person (or so) art council to be made up of
> currently trusted members.
>
> Pretty much self-explanatory. I would propose: (and this is just off
> the top of my head. don't feel slighted if I don't list you)
>
>
Thats alot of ideas :P.
>1. Clearing out the current LP art team and starting from zero. Closing
>it and making it a moderated team.
>
>The Launchpad team means and does nothing. I really don't see the
>need for a open team. Karma? No. I want to give it meaning. Being on
>this team wil
On Sun, 2009-04-19 at 12:52 -0400, Cory K. wrote:
> 1. Clearing out the current LP art team and starting from zero. Closing
> it and making it a moderated team.
Agreed.
> 2. The current mailing list will be a discussion list and the new list
> (already waiting in the wings) be for LP team membe
18 matches
Mail list logo
