> I PREFERE THE SIMPLICITY AND THE LOOK OF GNOME...
> BUT SOME FUNCTIONS OF KDE ARE GOOD.
THANKS, MESSAGE RECEIVED LOUD AND CLEAR :|
THIS EMAIL WILL SELF-DESTRUCT IN 5 ... 4 ... 3 ...
;)
\d
--
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu
I PREFERE THE SIMPLICITY AND THE LOOK OF GNOME...
BUT SOME FUNCTIONS OF KDE ARE GOOD.
2007/11/22, Donn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > Afterstep was good. Very good. But then again anything seemed
> > magnificent compare to the likes of twm. That default background was
> > epilepsy inducing.
> Ha, you
> Afterstep was good. Very good. But then again anything seemed
> magnificent compare to the likes of twm. That default background was
> epilepsy inducing.
Ha, you are right there!
\d
--
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art
On 22/11/2007, at 5:41 PM, Donn wrote:
>> I think another big turn off for us Linux / FreeBSD users is the fact
>> that KDE is a direct rip off of Windows, and that's not fun,
> I don't grok this. How is the essential layout and set of concepts
> between
> Gnome, KDE and Windows any different?
> I think another big turn off for us Linux / FreeBSD users is the fact
> that KDE is a direct rip off of Windows, and that's not fun,
I don't grok this. How is the essential layout and set of concepts between
Gnome, KDE and Windows any different?
Taskbar, tray, "Start" button, panels, windows, mi
Sorry for the double mail, I just found the interview in english:
http://www.abclinuxu.cz/clanky/rozhovory/mark-shuttleworth?page=1
The interesting point:
*4) How are you looking forward to KDE 4? Is there a possibility of
KDE 4 ever displacing Gnome as the default 'desktop of choice' for Ubuntu?
As far as I know (from an interview I read), he choose GNOME because
they compromised on a 6 month development cycle (to match that of
Ubuntu) and because GNOME has a compromise on usability and not only on
features.
Regards,
D.
titon barua escribió:
> Hi ppl, i know it's like flamming but i woul
On 22/11/2007, at 8:35 AM, Carlos Moreno wrote:
> Though I mostly agree with the rest of your message, I have to object
> to the above --- from everything I read, what KDE people say about
> GNOME has nothing to do with performance!
I've heard Gnome criticized plenty of times for being bloated a
Daniel Moore wrote:
> The KDE people say the same thing about Gnome that the Gnome people
> say about KDE (performance, bloat, etc) . I think in the end it seems
> that there is very little reason to separate the two systems based on
> performance.
Though I mostly agree with the rest of your
The KDE people say the same thing about Gnome that the Gnome people
say about KDE (performance, bloat, etc) . I think in the end it seems
that there is very little reason to separate the two systems based on
performance. They both do what they are meant to do pretty well.
The Gnome project r
On Nov 21, 2007 8:03 PM, Carlos Moreno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> titon barua wrote:
> > Hi ppl, i know it's like flamming but i would really like to ask
> > suttleworth why did he choose gnome, not kde as default(i'm aware abt
> > kubuntu)? With upcoming kde4, i think ubuntu should default kde
>
titon barua wrote:
> Hi ppl, i know it's like flamming but i would really like to ask
> suttleworth why did he choose gnome, not kde as default(i'm aware abt
> kubuntu)? With upcoming kde4, i think ubuntu should default kde
I think it should not --- and thank all gods that it is not.
Not sure if
12 matches
Mail list logo
