Hi all,
The problems with the flood of email with attachements was somewhat my fault.
Coz had sent several emails trying to post to the list which got caught in
the queue. When I went through the queue a few days later I mistakingly
allowed all the emails through and not just one (as I thought
On Sunday 03 February 2008 21:21:20 Sumit Chandra Agarwal wrote:
> Though I'm very new to all this, I couldn't see it being useful to take a
> defeatist view. You're probably right about the mailing lists, though. But
> I think it should be possible to assemble capable teams to push Ubuntu
> forwa
> > From: Sumit Chandra Agarwal [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: 2008-02-03 18:16:39 CET
> > To: Discussion on Ubuntu artwork [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: [ubuntu-art] wav instead of ogg
> >
> > I agree with coz on some points below, except rather than his impressive
i agree with you
2008/2/3, coz DS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Hey guys,
> Having been a member of the ubuntu art team for several years I would
> have hoped you people would have been able to come up with something better
> than taking your frustrations with "slow connections" out on anyone other
>
Though I'm very new to all this, I couldn't see it being useful to take
a defeatist view. You're probably right about the mailing lists,
though. But I think it should be possible to assemble capable teams to
push Ubuntu forward, as long as there is the a surrounding culture and
framework that n
Sumit Chandra Agarwal wrote:
> I agree with coz on some points below, except rather than his impressive
> several years on the team, I'm speaking from the vantage point of a
> newcomer.
>
> Coming into the community it was fairly surprising to see that art
> development in Ubuntu is chiefly han
o make a suggestion for a wallpaper, just
need to get some "school-work" done etc.
Cheers,
- Thomas L.G
> From: Sumit Chandra Agarwal [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 2008-02-03 18:16:39 CET
> To: Discussion on Ubuntu artwork [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [ubuntu-art] wav
On Saturday 02 February 2008 01:24:09 Troy James Sobotka wrote:
> Carlos Moreno wrote:
> > If that's not the case in this list (that is, if this list is intended
> > for people to send files as attachments), please guys let me
> > know, in which case I would be forced to unsubscribe from
> > the l
I agree with coz on some points below, except rather than his impressive
several years on the team, I'm speaking from the vantage point of a
newcomer.
Coming into the community it was fairly surprising to see that art
development in Ubuntu is chiefly handled through a poorly organized wiki
(su
Hey guys,
Having been a member of the ubuntu art team for several years I would have
hoped you people would have been able to come up with something better than
taking your frustrations with "slow connections" out on anyone other than
yourselves and finding better solutions to the problem than,
Fair, but there are tons of web-based or normal desktop applications
that help the user choose whether to download the attachments or
simply list them. They could make good use of free email just for
mailing lists
On the other hand, if I'm being too "harsh" on separating the emails
from mailing li
On Sat, 2008-02-02 at 00:24 -0800, Troy James Sobotka wrote:
> I would forward a motion to ban all attachments from this list in the
> interest of keeping _everyone_ able to participate in the discussions.
> From this point onwards, no attachments would be considered acceptable
> with a link to th
Carlos Moreno wrote:
> If that's not the case in this list (that is, if this list is intended
> for people to send files as attachments), please guys let me
> know, in which case I would be forced to unsubscribe from
> the list.
Ken - perhaps we should announce this as a rule for the list to abid
> What does it matter that it is one file at a time? You're sending
> WAVE FILES, and I (and as you already saw, others too) have
> a painfully slow connection!
Seconded.
\d
--
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art
coz DS wrote:
> i am sending the sound files, one at a time so not to upset anyone
> with download time.
Man, am I going to have to black-list you at server-level
What does it matter that it is one file at a time? You're sending
WAVE FILES, and I (and as you already saw, others too) have
a
I feel like this one doesn't work as well. Too stark, too
augmented-sounded rather than a good major or lydian tone.
-Sumit
coz DS wrote:
> Hey guys ,
> The sound files I sent were in .ogg format and i noticed that gnome
> doesnt like ogg , at least here it doesnt , so i am sending the sound
>
16 matches
Mail list logo
