On Apr 7, 2010, at 4:21 AM, Thorsten Wilms wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-04-06 at 17:02 -0700, iceman snowman wrote:
>
>> I would design something myself, but I need the new Ubuntu logo. Can
>> anyone provide me with a high-resolution .PNG, or similar with the new
>> Ubuntu logo on it? Speaking of which,
On Wednesday 07 April 2010 02:41:13 pm Saleel Velankar wrote:
> The logo-type still isn't available as anything else but the preview
>
> > we've seen.
> > --
> > Thorsten
>
> Its frustrating because Richard Johnson (nixternal) mentioned having the
> svg at least for the kubuntu logo on omgubuntu
The logo-type still isn't available as anything else but the preview
> we've seen.
> --
> Thorsten
>
Its frustrating because Richard Johnson (nixternal) mentioned having the svg
at least for the kubuntu logo on omgubuntu, and using it in the creation of
the boot theme. At this point even a rough u
On Tue, 2010-04-06 at 17:02 -0700, iceman snowman wrote:
> I would design something myself, but I need the new Ubuntu logo. Can
> anyone provide me with a high-resolution .PNG, or similar with the new
> Ubuntu logo on it? Speaking of which, the artwork wiki should also
> provide the new logo.
The
On Tue, 2010-04-06 at 16:35 -0700, Dana Goyette wrote:
> (Since top-posting seems to be the norm here, I shall follow that trend.)
It isn't and please don't do that. You are just seeing an influx of
people who don't know how to behave on a mailing list, especially one
with an official etiquette:
go.
>>
>>
>> Thank you
>> Iceman
>>
>> ----------
>> *From:* Dana Goyette
>>
>> *To:* ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
>> *Sent:* Wed, April 7, 2010 2:35:35 AM
>> *Subject:* Re: [ubuntu-art] Suggestion
>>
>>
ion .PNG, or similar with the new Ubuntu logo
> on it? Speaking of which, the artwork wiki should also provide the new logo.
>
>
> Thank you
> Iceman
>
> --
> *From:* Dana Goyette
>
> *To:* ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
> *Sent:* Wed, Apr
ceman
From: Dana Goyette
To: ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
Sent: Wed, April 7, 2010 2:35:35 AM
Subject: Re: [ubuntu-art] Suggestion
Speaking of "not knowing progress", I find the current Plymouth behavior
looks like a "deranged" progress bar, rather than like an &
up following the percentage of
> the OS loaded.
>
>
> __
> From: show...@shaw.ca
> To: ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
> Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2010 16:25:53 -0700
> Subject: [ubuntu-art] Suggestion
>
n't
> light up following the percentage of the OS loaded.
>
>
> From: show...@shaw.ca
> To: ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
> Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2010 16:25:53 -0700
> Subject: [ubuntu-art] Suggestion
>
> This is a suggestion
ually loop and don't light
> up following the percentage of the OS loaded.
>
> --
> From: show...@shaw.ca
> To: ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
> Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2010 16:25:53 -0700
> Subject: [ubuntu-art] Suggestion
>
> This is a suggestion si
10 16:25:53 -0700
Subject: [ubuntu-art] Suggestion
This is a suggestion since I have no talent in art
When Ubuntu first boot with the Ubuntu and the few dots under
I would recommend the following
Have the word Ubuntu written inside the logo with the logo gradually increasing
with
This is a suggestion since I have no talent in art
When Ubuntu first boot with the Ubuntu and the few dots under
I would recommend the following
Have the word Ubuntu written inside the logo with the logo gradually
increasing with the original color using each segment
as Ubuntu loads the same cou
I agree with the screensavers, half of them just fail
--
Will Rogers - "I don't make jokes. I just watch the government and report
the facts."
--
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art
t users go to do
that is the included alternate wallpaper folder.
Thanks,
Brian
- Original Message
From: Kenneth Wimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Discussion on Ubuntu artwork
Sent: Thursday, July 3, 2008 5:31:34 AM
Subject: Re: [ubuntu-art] Suggestion for more wallpapers -- Re: Wh
On Thursday 03 July 2008 03:16:33 Brian Fleeger wrote:
> Salene -- Thanks, you are right to point out it is not art related.
>
> However, the two areas I point out have been the object of many legitimate
> critiques in the past from many press reviews of Ubuntu and in many a
> forum. I do not thin
is to make
Ubuntu a better end product.
Regards,
Brian
- Original Message
From: Salane Ashcraft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Discussion on Ubuntu artwork
Sent: Wednesday, July 2, 2008 7:33:44 PM
Subject: Re: [ubuntu-art] Suggestion for more wallpapers -- Re: Whats Up with
This?
uld be trimmed?
>
> Regards,
> Brian Fleeger
>
> - Original Message
> From: Kenneth Wimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Discussion on Ubuntu artwork
> Sent: Wednesday, July 2, 2008 6:44:41 AM
> Subject: Re: [ubuntu-art] Suggestion for more wallpapers -- Re: Whats Up
> wit
that could be trimmed?
Regards,
Brian Fleeger
- Original Message
From: Kenneth Wimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Discussion on Ubuntu artwork
Sent: Wednesday, July 2, 2008 6:44:41 AM
Subject: Re: [ubuntu-art] Suggestion for more wallpapers -- Re: Whats Up with
This?
On Wednesday 0
On Wednesday 02 July 2008 05:07:37 Brian Fleeger wrote:
> Ravindra makes a good point -- each release should have a better selection
> of alternate wallpapers. I posted a bunch of open source photographs a few
> days back on the "Desktop Background Submissions" page, all taken from the
> WikiMedia
I'm relatively new to the list, but based on some of the work I've already
seen, damn...there's no shortage of interesting wallpapers out there.
Wallpapers are pretty small -- there's some great stuff out there.
On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 11:16 PM, Mark Devet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes, I total
Yes, I totally agree. Please, please include a more diverse selection of
alternate wallpapers in the Intrepid release. There should be no problem
even including more than 7 or 8
On 7/1/08, Brian Fleeger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Ravindra makes a good point -- each release should have a bette
Ravindra makes a good point -- each release should have a better selection of
alternate wallpapers. I posted a bunch of open source photographs a few days
back on the "Desktop Background Submissions" page, all taken from the WikiMedia
site. I selected each of them for their inherent mixture of
On Thu, 2006-05-18 at 06:51 -0400, Lukas Sabota wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-05-18 at 20:44 +1000, Pascal Klein wrote:
> > > > Lukas Sabota wrote:
> > I'm not too fond of this idea. Why do we need to change them?
> >
> > Maybe it is just me but I think adding unnecessary orange to even
> > application i
On Thu, 2006-05-18 at 20:44 +1000, Pascal Klein wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-05-17 at 22:18 -0400, Lukas Sabota wrote:
> > On Wed, 2006-05-17 at 05:15 +0100, Mark Shuttleworth wrote:
> > > Lukas Sabota wrote:
> > > > Hello!
> > > > There are a few icons that are displayed on the default desktop. I'll
>
On Wed, 2006-05-17 at 22:18 -0400, Lukas Sabota wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-05-17 at 05:15 +0100, Mark Shuttleworth wrote:
> > Lukas Sabota wrote:
> > > Hello!
> > > There are a few icons that are displayed on the default desktop. I'll
> > > list them here:
> > > Applications
> > > Mozilla-Firefox
> >
Lukas Sabota wrote:
Hello!
There are a few icons that are displayed on the default desktop. I'll
list them here:
Applications
Mozilla-Firefox
Evolution
Log out
Show Desktop
Trash
My idea is to theme some of these icons orange. Here is a suggestion
for each of these:
Applications - Already Oran
Lukas Sabota wrote:
Hello!
There are a few icons that are displayed on the default desktop. I'll
list them here:
Applications
Mozilla-Firefox
Evolution
Log out
Show Desktop
Trash
My idea is to theme some of these icons orange. Here is a suggestion
for each of these:
Applications - Already
Hello!
There are a few icons that are displayed on the default desktop. I'll
list them here:
Applications
Mozilla-Firefox
Evolution
Log out
Show Desktop
Trash
My idea is to theme some of these icons orange. Here is a suggestion
for each of these:
Applications - Already Orange
Mozilla Firefox - U
Hello,
This would be my preferred solution, but I think upstream makes
this difficult because the pointer is by default at the center of
the icon, and its difficult to know how wide the icon is. Michael,
is it possible to make popups point be at the bottom of the icon
they are referring
Manu Cornet wrote:
* Place the bubble farther from the panel, so that a small piece of the
background is visible between them (thus making the triangle "pointier"
and more precise).
This would be my preferred solution, but I think upstream makes this
difficult because the pointer is by d
Ricardo Pérez López wrote:
I think the new notification bubble has a little problem: it is
difficult to realize what is the icon the bubble is pointing.
Yes, I can see what you are saying. We went to quite a lot of trouble
to make the popup cleaner and classier, and I don't think we can
Hi Ricardo !
> I think the new notification bubble has a little problem: it is
> difficult to realize what is the icon the bubble is pointing.
I agree that it's not easy to see where the notification is pointing. I
see two direct solutions for this :
* Draw a black border around the notificatio
Only for comparing, we can see the old notification bubble here:
http://www.ubuntu.com/include/testing/flight4/update-notification.png
We can see it's easier to realize which icon generates the notification.
The upper "triangle" which is pointing to the icon is greater than the
triangle in the cu
Hi! I'm writing here just to do a suggestion about the notification
bubble.
I think the new notification bubble has a little problem: it is
difficult to realize what is the icon the bubble is pointing.
In the attached image you can see a notification bubble, near to many
icons, but it's difficult
On 9/6/05, Pascal Klein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Marvelous idea. I really like this, and I think art.ubuntu.com could easily be
> the staging ground for such an event. :-)
>
> Anyone else agree? :-)
I agree, but we may want to save that until the bugs are worked out of
the site. :o)
By the
Hello,
Matthew Nuzum schrieb:
Yes, but you can't let the users be the jury. Canonical folks or a
person trusted outside the organization needs to be the judge.
Rule-by-committee *never* works.
Hm users could by the jury but you will need rules. Rules what kind of
art ist wanted. Clear you nee
Matthew Nuzum wrote:
On 9/6/05, Sascha Morr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello,
just a little idea for a better integration of users into the ubuntu art
project. we could create a contest for every upcomming version of ubuntu
and the users are the jury (could rate the wallpapers, themes, icon
On 9/6/05, Sascha Morr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> just a little idea for a better integration of users into the ubuntu art
> project. we could create a contest for every upcomming version of ubuntu
> and the users are the jury (could rate the wallpapers, themes, icons
> etc.). The bes
Pascal Klein wrote:
[...]
Anyone else agree? :-)
[...]
yep.
--
http://www.livejournal.com/users/bmgz
--
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
http://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art
On Tue, 6 Sep 2005 09:38 pm, Sascha Morr wrote:
> Hello,
>
> just a little idea for a better integration of users into the ubuntu art
> project. we could create a contest for every upcomming version of ubuntu
> and the users are the jury (could rate the wallpapers, themes, icons
> etc.). The best t
Hello,
just a little idea for a better integration of users into the ubuntu art
project. we could create a contest for every upcomming version of ubuntu
and the users are the jury (could rate the wallpapers, themes, icons
etc.). The best three wallpapers, three themes, three iconsets etc.
cou
42 matches
Mail list logo
