Re: [ubuntu-art] CSS Version of the ubuntu logo

2012-09-28 Thread Inayaili Leon
On the contrary, the reference section is quite good in giving all the browser specific selector support, etc :) Yaili On 28/09/2012, at 16:08, Germán Valencia wrote: > Will do, thanks > On Sep 28, 2012 3:16 AM, "Inayaili Leon" > wrote: > > > > Looks great, Germán! > > > > I'd recommend MDN (

Re: [ubuntu-art] CSS Version of the ubuntu logo

2012-09-28 Thread Germán Valencia
Will do, thanks On Sep 28, 2012 3:16 AM, "Inayaili Leon" wrote: > > Looks great, Germán! > > I'd recommend MDN (Mozilla Developer Network) over W3Schools for reference, it's more reliable. > > Yaili > > On 28/09/2012, at 03:53, Germán Valencia wrote: > >> I didn't quite "forget" the arm breaks, it

Re: [ubuntu-art] CSS Version of the ubuntu logo

2012-09-28 Thread Inayaili Leon
Looks great, Germán! I'd recommend MDN (Mozilla Developer Network) over W3Schools for reference, it's more reliable. Yaili On 28/09/2012, at 03:53, Germán Valencia wrote: > I didn't quite "forget" the arm breaks, it's just that the translations > required to offset them into their place arent

Re: [ubuntu-art] CSS Version of the ubuntu logo

2012-09-27 Thread Germán Valencia
I didn't quite "forget" the arm breaks, it's just that the translations required to offset them into their place arent entirely standard, so i've only written them for Firefox (Will get to safari/chrome some other day). One can easily do so by visiting the W3Schools article on css transforms. On T

Re: [ubuntu-art] CSS Version of the ubuntu logo

2012-09-27 Thread Connor P
Forgot some of the arm breaks, at least on Chrome: http://puu.sh/19hIO Looks great tho. On 9/27/2012 9:08 PM, Germán Valencia wrote: Hey guys. I'm pretty new to this HTML thing so i decided to get my feet wet a bit with a contribution: http://jsfiddle.net/Drknzz/nNQfw/3/ It is by no means pe