Re: [ubuntu-art] [Breathe] Help Wanted - Wiki Maintainer

2009-09-25 Thread dani
El vie, 25-09-2009 a las 15:10 -0400, Cory K. escribió: > Maintaining the wiki has been alot of work. I'm not even sure if anyone > actually cares that you can preview the icons and they are updated at > every revision. > > So instead of just stopping, I was wondering if someone would like to be >

Re: [ubuntu-art] Icon library

2009-09-17 Thread dani
El jue, 17-09-2009 a las 22:23 +0530, mac_v escribió: > Hi, > > I came across a nice app which can be useful for icon artists. :) > > https://code.launchpad.net/icon-library/+download > > Download the tar.gz , extract it and run icon-library.py > > I find it useful to check > - if the symlinks

Re: [ubuntu-art] [Breathe] Daniel's edits review

2009-09-01 Thread dani
El mar, 01-09-2009 a las 13:31 -0300, spg76 escribió: > Hi. > I finally got the time to make a review of Daniel's edits. > https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Artwork/BreatheIconSet/Submissions?action=AttachFile&do=get&target=Breathe-Edit_0.10.tar.gz > > First, I gotta say that I think that they look better t

Re: [ubuntu-art] [Breathe] Development timeline

2009-08-27 Thread dani
El sáb, 22-08-2009 a las 11:06 -0400, Cory K. escribió: > So with Sebastien taking some time to handle family business (doin' a > bit of that myself honestly) I'm looking at things we can refine a bit > on the Breathe wiki. > > I started a "Timeline" page and would like some feedback as to some >

Re: [ubuntu-art] [Breathe] battery status

2009-07-23 Thread dani
On mié, 2009-07-22 at 16:52 -0400, Cory K. wrote: > @Daniel: Do you have more color-corrected SVGS? I was kinda waiting on > getting more from you until I upload what I have. (I forwarded Seb the > ones you sent so he could see the colors) > > > -Cory K. ok, please do not upload even my correct

Re: [ubuntu-art] [Breathe] battery status

2009-07-22 Thread dani
On mié, 2009-07-22 at 12:50 -0300, spg76 wrote: > I uploaded to the wiki new icons for the battery status. > https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Artwork/BreatheIconSet/Submissions#Status > -- > Seba (AKA spg76) > http://www.ubuntu-ar.org > I like it but you should adjust the colors to the palette, as well

Re: [ubuntu-art] [Breathe]Palette and contrast

2009-07-18 Thread dani
On sáb, 2009-07-18 at 10:45 -0400, Cory K. wrote: > I think the idea is sound but this should be done on the Submissions > page. We can do this work without question on the rest of the icons > but > the fact of the matter is very little folks care about the rest of the > pages. > > So, my opinion

[ubuntu-art] [Breahte]Gnome redesing icons

2009-07-18 Thread dani
gnome team is designing new icons with a more realistic, the result is really very good, http://people.freedesktop.org/~jimmac/icons/#git Daniel.P -- ubuntu-art mailing list ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art

Re: [ubuntu-art] [Breathe]Palette and contrast

2009-07-18 Thread dani
I do not wish to create more pages, therefore I thought this might be a good idea, I only edited the first so that you coment. https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Artwork/BreatheIconSet/Icons#preview what do you think? Daniel.P -- ubuntu-art mailing list ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu

Re: [ubuntu-art] [Breathe]Palette and contrast

2009-07-18 Thread dani
On vie, 2009-07-17 at 20:49 -0400, Cory K. wrote: > Daniel has sent me a pack of 76 icons all color corrected! It's really > striking how much a difference it makes. There might be slight tweaks > after this but this was something that really needed to be done. > > After the branch merge is done (

[ubuntu-art] [Breathe]Palette and contrast

2009-07-16 Thread dani
I saw that all of Breathe icons are not coordinated palette and in general are very different. well as the folder icons are too saturated. You can see sets of many icons such as humanity or gnome-colors, which despite having a different style, are pleasant and Swabian. we need to fix this in B

Re: [ubuntu-art] [Breathe] mimetypes

2009-07-14 Thread dani
On mar, 2009-07-14 at 16:07 -0300, spg76 wrote: > > Ok. So while I'm not thrilled with the simplicity of the base > I think > this is our best option now. I also don't want to drag this > question out > any longer. > > @Sebastien: If