ike". Maybe the shortness of the head? It seems that the length
from the point where the eyes would be to the end of the nose needs a little
more length to make it more like the mountain goat that it should be. Or is
it just me?
Ashton
--
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art
Heh. If there was a *secret team* how would anyone know? Unless it was a
poorly kept secret.
I would say it is safe to assume there is no dedicated team, but now you
have me wondering...
Conspiracies!
Ashton
--
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art
ng brown and then
lo and behold, people suddenly like it! Who knew? Maybe it has something to
do with design, choices, and proper use?
Ashton
--
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art
problem with it.
How thin can that get? Maybe start from there, as thin as possible before
disappearing, and then tweak it coming from that direction.
Ashton
--
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art
On Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 11:17 AM, Cory K. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> This is *very* close to some of the suggestions I talked to Ken about.
> With some tweaks, this could be default IMO.
>
I like it. No gloss. A lack of thick borders. Clean.
--
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.
On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 4:40 PM, shadowh511 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Aug 4, 2008, at 3:06 PM, Ashton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 3:32 PM, shadowh511 < <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>
&
On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 3:32 PM, shadowh511 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Why do we care about top posting again?
>
For consistency.
For example, why do we care about having lanes where traffic flows in one
direction? What do we care if someone wants to go the other way?
Ashton
e bottom. ;)
>>>
>>
>> There isn't a setting, but you can simply hit Ctrl+End once you opened the
>> reply window.
>>
>
>
> Related question, are we supposed to keep to delete the mailing list
> footer?
>
Just delete everything not related to your
to the people within your group, for example. Instead of conveying it to an
entire list of fine people who have worked hard in the past. Even when
appended with an disclaimer.
Ashton
--
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art
rking with a team of people who agree with your general take on The State
of Things. In addition, the experience just isn't there (with the history of
the art team at Ubuntu) and I, also a new-comer, sense a lot of eye-rolling.
Well, hey. I'll just speak for myself: My eyes roll a lot.
Ashton
--
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art
to do is go to the themes tab
in the appearances menu and click Install (lower right corner). Then you
choose one of the floating tarballs you've downloaded, and you should be
set.
Ashton
--
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art
love the tech talk vids, thanks for finding this
one.
Ashton
--
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art
On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 11:49 PM, Ashton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> A site using the same fonts for both elements:
>
> http://maddox.xmission.com/
>
Alright, so it isn't using the same font. Bad example.
Ashton
--
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.co
site using the same fonts for both elements:
http://maddox.xmission.com/
Also, it can't dilute /while/ broadening right? It would have to be one or
the other.
Ashton
--
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art
use of what
should be thought of as part of the circle of friends logo. Not something
meant to ubuntu-i-fize other ordinary text. Even the tag line. Obviously,
what is done is done, and it is too late now.
Ashton
--
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art
e I can see the use there, thought not the necessity. Does FedEx, for
example have their logo dual-purposed as a font?
Not trying to negate the effort to fix or otherwise improve the ubuntu-title
font. The thread just got me thinking and thought I'd share.
Ashton
--
ubuntu-art mai
e that was recommended but which I haven't
> tried is LMSansDemiCondensed Regular available in the lmodern package
> in Ubuntu (part of TeX).
Yet another non-free (sorry) font to add to this list : Vag
Rounded<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/VAG_Rounded>(Adobe)
Ashton
--
I thought was "peach" as well...in addition
to the min/max/button choice.
So if the colors aren't great, and the style is so-so, what is it about Kith
that people like? (question not aimed at those who like the peach/salmon
thing, obviously). Is it just about the window borde
the
internet as a resource to begin with. I don't think Ubuntu's payoff would be
worth the effort. People like what they like. They know where to get it or
how to look for it. Whether it is pics of the kids, their favorite
celebrity, or some swirly gradient grunge design.
Ashton
--
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art
Beautiful. Guess that's that. Onward and whatnot...
On Sat, Jul 5, 2008 at 11:52 PM, Salane Ashcraft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Its very good- I actually replaced all of my fonts in windows, mac, and
> desktopbsd with them.
>
>
> On Sun, Jul 6, 2008 at 12:45 AM
Oh good.
On Sat, Jul 5, 2008 at 11:42 PM, Salane Ashcraft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I tried both out, and Droid was much much better.
> Salane
>
>
> On Sun, Jul 6, 2008 at 12:31 AM, Ashton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Ooops! Flubbed the send button...
Ooops! Flubbed the send button...
Then it went: No! Lib Sans is wrong! We should use a Humanist styled font!
Then back to: Droid! Droid is the one!
That was a full circle.
And again, I don't understand the why's.
On Sat, Jul 5, 2008 at 11:28 PM, Ashton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wro
Gotta say...Droid is awfully similar to Liberation...I don't mind. But I
don't have any clue where this is going. If you think one is "not a good
system font" then how do you get to the other being ZOMG awesome? What is
the reason for wanting to use it, other than it having Google Android ties
and
Erm, I suppose an easy test would be to open up OpenOffice, and compare two
identical paragraphs using the two fonts to see if they break in the same
place...in regard to the metrics...durf. Like I said, no font expert.
Ashton
On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 11:18 AM, Ashton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
t : p) so I wouldn't know. But I do recognize the
importance/convenience.
Ashton
On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 11:10 AM, Kenneth Wimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wednesday 02 July 2008 19:04:37 Salane Ashcraft wrote:
> > So I just looked at it again- we could possibly
Ah. Didn't look deep enough to see which came first. (droid or android) I
assumed they were paying for it though.
Ashton
On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 9:51 AM, Kenneth Wimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wednesday 02 July 2008 17:46:14 Ashton wrote:
> > Droid is also being used
Droid is also being used in Google's Android project.
http://damieng.com/blog/2007/11/14/droid-font-family-courtesy-of-google-ascender
Ashton
On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 9:33 AM, Salane Ashcraft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Since you have an official canonical email, would y
e install - would get a more useful response out of the community,
instead of death threats, insults, and Mob fear reaction.
NOW, for my question. :)
If the dark theme is an experiment, what is the fallback? Is it "unity"?
Something else entirely?
Ashton
On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 9:17 A
>- with a pale iris and horizontal slit-shaped pupils.
I will do so. I noticed this trait in all the pics I looked at, and failed
to carry it over.
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 4:25 PM, Conn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 10:31 PM, Ashton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> w
ting for feedback, but seeing
someone else use it is good feedback! :)
It allows for choosing which colors you want from the appearance menu, or a
gradient. That way you can make it darker or lighter to match your
preference. I think I need to tweak the transparent parts though.
Ashton
On Mon, Jun 30, 2
yeah, who knows why we do the tings we do?
Máirín Duffy, art dev at Fedora, has a study of fonts and licensing that
someone might find interesting:http://duffy.fedorapeople.org/fonts/
I don't know what Fedora Sulphur is using as default sys font, though. Is it
Liberation?
Ashton
On Mon, Ju
OSS Segoe (cough...Frutiger) or Myriad Pro choice out there,
then sure, why the heck not? I think one will have to get to work on that
though.
Ashton
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 11:39 AM, Salane Ashcraft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I just looked at them... not so good for a system font.
Have you tried Liberation Sans? I think it's a great choice. As I mentioned
earlier, Firefox in particular, when changed from within preferences, looks
much more crisp and clean. I don't have much experience with the other
Liberation fonts, though.
Ashton
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 a
ally been settled and the Liberation fonts have been accepted
into the Debian archive <http://packages.debian.org/sid/ttf-liberation>.
Other distros are expected to follow suit soon."
Ashton
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 10:38 AM, Cory K. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Salane As
rs.
screenshot -
http://picasaweb.google.com/cogneato/UbuntuRelated/photo#5217703878919813170
Ashton
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 8:01 AM, Kenneth Wimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Monday 30 June 2008 15:56:48 Ashton wrote:
> > >The fonts are open source (and include symbols for
ion Sans, etc. for a while now
whenever I set up my desktop. I really enjoy the look, especially within
Firefox, where the Liberation fonts (to me) vastly improve the experience.
Can Ubuntu use these as defaults now?
Ashton
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 7:11 AM, Kenneth Wimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Does anyone know which SVG version is being used/supported among apps like
Eye of Gnome/Mozilla/Inkscape etc? Or which features are supported? I assume
that is where the difference is. I have recently lingered too long within
Illustrator with a piece and learned that the "color dodge" and "color bu
Worked for me. Give it another try?
On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 12:42 PM, Salane Ashcraft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> For some reason I could not download it...
> Salane Ashcraft
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> --
> ubuntu-art mailing list
> ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/lis
38 matches
Mail list logo
