Re: [ubuntu-art] Karmic Questions.

2009-03-28 Thread shadowh511
2009/3/28 Kenneth Wimer > On Saturday 28 March 2009 17:21:50 Saleel wrote: > > Cory K. wrote: > > > I don't mean to be a pain at all I just mean to get you thinking a > > > little to ask different questions that don't make it appear as though > we > > > on this list are bound by any guidelines Ca

Re: [ubuntu-art] Karmic Questions

2009-03-28 Thread Andrew
2009/3/28 Kenneth Wimer : >> It would have been nice to see some items land in community-themes but >> that effort did not bear fruit. As you plan for Karmic that should be a >> topic for discussion. > > As the community-themes package is in universe we can still update it. > I'm not sure what the

[ubuntu-art] theme design for karmik koala

2009-03-28 Thread daniel planas armangue
I'm creating a Human skin theme for presentation at karmik koala. This in an early version but you can provide i i suggest changes for improvement. https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Artwork/Incoming/Karmic/Human%20Skin -- ubuntu-art mailing list ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailma

Re: [ubuntu-art] [Breathe] Submissions page formatting change.

2009-03-28 Thread Cory K.
Cory K. wrote: > daniel planas armangue wrote: > >> good plan, but where are actions? >> >> > > You know how to edit the wiki right? ;) > I thought about it after I sent it. *Do Not* add that whole "Actions" section or the whole of any other section. ;) What I've added is enough. If yo

Re: [ubuntu-art] [Breathe] Submissions page formatting change.

2009-03-28 Thread Cory K.
daniel planas armangue wrote: > good plan, but where are actions? > > You know how to edit the wiki right? ;) -Cory K. -- ubuntu-art mailing list ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art

Re: [ubuntu-art] [Breathe] Submissions page formatting change.

2009-03-28 Thread daniel planas armangue
El sáb, 28-03-2009 a las 15:26 -0400, Cory K. escribió: > In an effort to give more focus to some particular areas in Breathe I've > reformatted the submissions page a bit. > > I've sectioned it up a bit in order to show what still needs to be done > within the given area. Also, I hope this will l

[ubuntu-art] [Breathe] Submissions page formatting change.

2009-03-28 Thread Cory K.
In an effort to give more focus to some particular areas in Breathe I've reformatted the submissions page a bit. I've sectioned it up a bit in order to show what still needs to be done within the given area. Also, I hope this will let someone tackle an entire section so as to keep things consisten

Re: [ubuntu-art] Karmic Questions

2009-03-28 Thread Kenneth Wimer
On Saturday 28 March 2009 18:16:28 John Baer wrote: > Ken, > > What is the desire for submissions that missed the cut? My thoughts are > to push them to gnome-look and its sibling sites. Although designed with > Ubuntu in mind they may add value to other open source projects. :) Naturally, everyth

[ubuntu-art] Karmic Questions

2009-03-28 Thread John Baer
On Sat, 2009-03-28 at 16:29 + Kenneth Wimer wrote: > Message: 11 > Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2009 17:29:51 +0100 > From: Kenneth Wimer > Subject: Re: [ubuntu-art] Karmic Questions. > To: ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com > Message-ID: <200903281729.51818.kw...@ubuntu.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset

Re: [ubuntu-art] [Breathe] Shadowing

2009-03-28 Thread Cory K.
Oliver Scholtz wrote: > PS: Your gtk-media buttons are fine as-is. We have to consider the use of icons and the shadows on these will work fine. -Cory K. -- ubuntu-art mailing list ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art

Re: [ubuntu-art] [Breathe] Shadowing

2009-03-28 Thread Cory K.
Oliver Scholtz 1 wrote: > Top-down shadow? On the webcam? unrealistic... Not at all. If light is coming from the top the shadow casts on the floor. > But there are many Icons > made yet with the shadow on ground and there are possibilities to change > the shadow - yes. Shadows on the ground. Yes

Re: [ubuntu-art] Karmic Questions.

2009-03-28 Thread Kenneth Wimer
On Saturday 28 March 2009 17:21:50 Saleel wrote: > Cory K. wrote: > > I don't mean to be a pain at all I just mean to get you thinking a > > little to ask different questions that don't make it appear as though we > > on this list are bound by any guidelines Canonical puts out. ;) > > After conside

Re: [ubuntu-art] [Breathe] Shadowing

2009-03-28 Thread Kenneth Wimer
On Saturday 28 March 2009 15:09:54 Cory K. wrote: > I've noticed our shadowing is a bit inconsistent lately. > > I'm going to say that everything with a strait-on perspective needs to > have a have a top-down shadow. Except mimes where I feel its fine. > > I'm sure there's also a few exceptions her

Re: [ubuntu-art] Karmic Questions.

2009-03-28 Thread Saleel
Cory K. wrote: > I don't mean to be a pain at all I just mean to get you thinking a > little to ask different questions that don't make it appear as though we > on this list are bound by any guidelines Canonical puts out. ;) > After consideration, you are right. So then the question becomes: Do

Re: [ubuntu-art] [Breathe] Shadowing

2009-03-28 Thread Oliver Scholtz 1
Am Samstag, den 28.03.2009, 10:09 -0400 schrieb Cory K.: > I've noticed our shadowing is a bit inconsistent lately. > > I'm going to say that everything with a strait-on perspective needs to > have a have a top-down shadow. Except mimes where I feel its fine. > > I'm sure there's also a few excep

[ubuntu-art] [Breathe] Shadowing

2009-03-28 Thread Cory K.
I've noticed our shadowing is a bit inconsistent lately. I'm going to say that everything with a strait-on perspective needs to have a have a top-down shadow. Except mimes where I feel its fine. I'm sure there's also a few exceptions here where it makes a little artistic sense but we should go ba

Re: [ubuntu-art] Karmic Questions.

2009-03-28 Thread Cory K.
Saleel wrote: > Cory K. wrote: > >> Why? Where is there anything saying that what we do has to be in line >> with what they do? Who put that handcuff on us? >> >> > I have always thought that they should complement each other.When a > user chooses to install the community packages, he o

Re: [ubuntu-art] Karmic Questions.

2009-03-28 Thread Saleel
Cory K. wrote: > Why? Where is there anything saying that what we do has to be in line > with what they do? Who put that handcuff on us? > I have always thought that they should complement each other. When a user chooses to install the community packages, he or she is looking for artwork to bo

Re: [ubuntu-art] Karmic Questions.

2009-03-28 Thread Cory K.
Saleel wrote: > Cory K. wrote: > >> Who says we'll be contributing to Karmic? >> >> > The communities artwork should be in tune with whatever the grownups are > doing. Speak for yourself there kid. ;) > It would be odd if we started/produced work on brown wallpapers > if the official gu

Re: [ubuntu-art] Karmic Questions.

2009-03-28 Thread Saleel
Cory K. wrote: > > Who says we'll be contributing to Karmic? > > > -Cory K. The communities artwork should be in tune with whatever the grownups are doing. It would be odd if we started/produced work on brown wallpapers if the official gui is -for example- pink. --Saleel -- ubuntu-art mailing

Re: [ubuntu-art] Karmic Questions.

2009-03-28 Thread Cory K.
Saleel wrote: > I know that Karmic is going to have 'designers fingerprints all over > it', is there an actual new palette of colors that we can start > referring to? Will the alpha/betas of Karmic have an alpha/beta > background? It is very difficult to start putting down ideas if I cant > thi

[ubuntu-art] Karmic Questions.

2009-03-28 Thread Saleel
I know that Karmic is going to have 'designers fingerprints all over it', is there an actual new palette of colors that we can start referring to? Will the alpha/betas of Karmic have an alpha/beta background? It is very difficult to start putting down ideas if I cant think in the right colors.