Re: [ubuntu-art] New Human Icons

On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 10:15 PM, shadowh511 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Aug 4, 2008, at 5:28 PM, "Ryan Henningsen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > >> There has been recent discussion on the mailing list of new icons >> for Ubuntu. I'd like to post an example of an icon set Patrick >> Niklaus

Re: [ubuntu-art] New Human Icons

On Aug 4, 2008, at 5:28 PM, "Ryan Henningsen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > There has been recent discussion on the mailing list of new icons > for Ubuntu. I'd like to post an example of an icon set Patrick > Niklaus and myself are working on. Its color palette is based mainly > on the br

Re: [ubuntu-art] New Human Icons

On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 9:17 PM, Vadim Peretokin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > They look beautiful, I really can't complain. > > But can the trash icon stay like it is? In many countries, that paper bin > isn't really associated with trash so well (and I don't recognize it as > trash at first either.

Re: [ubuntu-art] Again, top-posting. (*sigh*)

Justin Dugger wrote: > On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 9:20 PM, Vadim Peretokin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> I think it's because Ubuntu artwork made it on Digg again, and a lot of >> people joined the list who aren't familiar with them at all. >> > > Which means etiquette really isn't as commonl

Re: [ubuntu-art] Again, top-posting. (*sigh*)

On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 9:20 PM, Vadim Peretokin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I think it's because Ubuntu artwork made it on Digg again, and a lot of > people joined the list who aren't familiar with them at all. Which means etiquette really isn't as commonly accepted as a select anachronistic few

Re: [ubuntu-art] Again, top-posting. (*sigh*)

I think it's because Ubuntu artwork made it on Digg again, and a lot of people joined the list who aren't familiar with them at all. -- ubuntu-art mailing list ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art

Re: [ubuntu-art] New Human Icons

They look beautiful, I really can't complain. But can the trash icon stay like it is? In many countries, that paper bin isn't really associated with trash so well (and I don't recognize it as trash at first either. More like an icon I saw from macs). Not sure if anyone else outside of NA has this

Re: [ubuntu-art] Iconset ideas

Pretty nice, but the _[]X really need to stay. -- ubuntu-art mailing list ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art

Re: [ubuntu-art] Kin "Piano" Progress

Hard to tell much from the screenshot, but if this applies - don't see why is the titlebar text italized, it makes it look kind of odd and not really pretty. Also hiding the _[]X buttons by default would be a screaming usability with common people. -- ubuntu-art mailing list ubuntu-art@lists.ubunt

Re: [ubuntu-art] Again, top-posting. (*sigh*)

On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 8:24 PM, Dean Landolt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Well, top posting is quite annoying when you're trying to view the thread >> linearly. Imagine if on a forum someone kept finding a way of posting before >> the original author way back on page one. >> >> Anyway, in Gmail

Re: [ubuntu-art] Again, top-posting. (*sigh*)

> Well, top posting is quite annoying when you're trying to view the thread > linearly. Imagine if on a forum someone kept finding a way of posting before > the original author way back on page one. > > Anyway, in Gmail it's pretty easy to avoid. When you do a replay just page > down to after the p

Re: [ubuntu-art] Again, top-posting. (*sigh*)

On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 8:00 PM, Dean Landolt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> I'm getting a bit tired of this eternal Top Posting rant. In the >> future mail, please perceived offenders off-list. >> > > +1 > > I know I'm just a lurker who ha

Re: [ubuntu-art] Again, top-posting. (*sigh*)

> I'm getting a bit tired of this eternal Top Posting rant. In the > future mail, please perceived offenders off-list. > +1 I know I'm just a lurker who has very little to offer, but frankly, this constant complaint is off putting. I total

Re: [ubuntu-art] Again, top-posting. (*sigh*)

On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 11:33 AM, Cory K. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Alexi Helligar wrote: >> Don't know about the "top-posting" business. I use Gmail and I just >> reply to messages I receive. > > Please follow well established etiquette or don't post to the list. > > http://www.ubuntu.com/suppor

Re: [ubuntu-art] Again, top-posting. (*sigh*)

On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 4:40 PM, shadowh511 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Aug 4, 2008, at 3:06 PM, Ashton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 3:32 PM, shadowh511 < <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> >> Why do we care about top posting again? >> > > > For

Re: [ubuntu-art] Again, top-posting. (*sigh*)

On Aug 4, 2008, at 3:06 PM, Ashton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 3:32 PM, shadowh511 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Why do we care about top posting again? For consistency. For example, why do we care about having lanes where traffic flows in one direction? What do we

Re: [ubuntu-art] Oops

On Aug 4, 2008, at 2:37 PM, "Salane Ashcraft" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 4:34 PM, shadowh511 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: >> The send key in gmail is the same as draft >> >> For art and desktop wise we just need everything integrated together. >> >> -- >> ubuntu-art

Re: [ubuntu-art] Again, top-posting. (*sigh*)

On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 3:32 PM, shadowh511 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Why do we care about top posting again? > For consistency. For example, why do we care about having lanes where traffic flows in one direction? What do we care if someone wants to go the other way? Ashton -- ubuntu-art

Re: [ubuntu-art] Oops

On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 4:34 PM, shadowh511 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The send key in gmail is the same as draft > > For art and desktop wise we just need everything integrated together. > > -- > ubuntu-art mailing list > ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubu

[ubuntu-art] Oops

The send key in gmail is the same as draft For art and desktop wise we just need everything integrated together. -- ubuntu-art mailing list ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art

[ubuntu-art] To get SOMETHING done

-- ubuntu-art mailing list ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art

Re: [ubuntu-art] Again, top-posting. (*sigh*)

On Aug 4, 2008, at 2:25 PM, "Ken Vermette" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 5:08 PM, coz DS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 2:12 PM, Thorsten Wilms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Mon, 2008-08-04 at 12:09 -0500, Matthew Nuzum wrote: > We need to be carefu

Re: [ubuntu-art] Again, top-posting. (*sigh*)

On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 5:08 PM, coz DS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 2:12 PM, Thorsten Wilms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> On Mon, 2008-08-04 at 12:09 -0500, Matthew Nuzum wrote: >> >> > We need to be careful to avoid putting too many barriers in place. >> > Nothing sti

Re: [ubuntu-art] Again, top-posting. (*sigh*)

On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 4:08 PM, coz DS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 2:12 PM, Thorsten Wilms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> On Mon, 2008-08-04 at 12:09 -0500, Matthew Nuzum wrote: >> >> > We need to be careful to avoid putting too many barriers in place. >> > Nothing sti

Re: [ubuntu-art] Again, top-posting. (*sigh*)

On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 2:12 PM, Thorsten Wilms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, 2008-08-04 at 12:09 -0500, Matthew Nuzum wrote: > > > We need to be careful to avoid putting too many barriers in place. > > Nothing stifles creativity and enthusiasm more than getting hit with a > > laundry list o

Re: [ubuntu-art] Iconset ideas

В 16:29 -0400 на 04.08.2008 (пн), Dean Landolt написа: > As for what gets used on websites, I'd say the famfamfam stuff gets > the most play. I know it's not really suited for use in ubuntu, but > it's gotten so much use it's starting to become the real standard > tango was supposed to be. I wond

Re: [ubuntu-art] Aiming for Main?

Thanks for the clarification. I feel I have a better understanding of the process now. -- ubuntu-art mailing list ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art

[ubuntu-art] Aiming for Main?

On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 3:11 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Bear with me guys, I'm a noob to this mailing list. > I don't seem to understand why we discuss this kind of stuff here, > I though we had no control over what gets shipped with Ubuntu. "No control" doesn't mean we don't affect. This li

Re: [ubuntu-art] Kin "Piano" Progress

On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 3:41 PM, Ken Vermette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 12:50 AM, Ken Vermette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> Hey Everyone; >> >> I've been without an internet connection of my own for awhile, I've >> recently moved so I'm waiting to get hooked up. >> >> T

Re: [ubuntu-art] Kin "Piano" Progress

On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 12:50 AM, Ken Vermette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hey Everyone; > > I've been without an internet connection of my own for awhile, I've > recently moved so I'm waiting to get hooked up. > > The Piano styling of Kin is still in the works, and some things are being > modifie

Re: [ubuntu-art] Iconset ideas

On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 3:59 PM, Vadim Peretokin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > >> >> Do I ever agree! No more Tango please! Its the scourge of Linux. >> >> > I have to ask, why? > > Not on the moving away from tango, that's fine. But why "Its the scourge of > Linux"? It's the first and only icon set

Re: [ubuntu-art] Iconset ideas

Bear with me guys, I'm a noob to this mailing list. I don't seem to understand why we discuss this kind of stuff here, I though we had no control over what gets shipped with Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-art mailing list ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art

Re: [ubuntu-art] Iconset ideas

I'd like to throw in HumanElephant-Savane ( http://img98.imageshack.us/img98/8148/screenshot8uj5.png), however I don't have a link to the theme. The one I find on gnome-look now doesn't look the same as the copy I have :( -- ubuntu-art mailing list ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.

Re: [ubuntu-art] Iconset ideas

> > > > Do I ever agree! No more Tango please! Its the scourge of Linux. > > I have to ask, why? Not on the moving away from tango, that's fine. But why "Its the scourge of Linux"? It's the first and only icon set that's actually being used in websites, programs, and is recognizable... -- ubuntu-

Re: [ubuntu-art] Iconset ideas

2008/8/4 Cory K. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > While I think they are a fine set, I'd like to see a design direction > set 1st. These might not fit a style that we go for. Personally, I feel > we need to move away from the Tango look. > > -Cory K. >

Re: [ubuntu-art] Iconset ideas

On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 2:43 PM, Cory K. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Michael Stephenson wrote: >> 2008/8/4 Salane Ashcraft <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> >> also Canonical had Iconforge create the human icons. Mark wants new >> icons, but also wants to retain our identity

[ubuntu-art] Iconset ideas

Michael Stephenson wrote: > 2008/8/4 Salane Ashcraft <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > also Canonical had Iconforge create the human icons. Mark wants new > icons, but also wants to retain our identity aka orange/brown. > > > Well if that is the case then perhaps we can hav

Re: [ubuntu-art] art concept

2008/8/4 Salane Ashcraft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > also Canonical had Iconforge create the human icons. Mark wants new > icons, but also wants to retain our identity aka orange/brown. > Well if that is the case then perhaps we can have a discussion on using the human-colors icons by perfectska04 http

Re: [ubuntu-art] art concept

On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 2:09 PM, Matthew Nuzum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 2:00 PM, Michael Stephenson > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> 2008/8/4 Matthew Nuzum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> >>> There are a ton of icons. If you just want to make a subtle change you >>> can re-use the

Re: [ubuntu-art] art concept

> So isn't the problem with creating community icons > that as soon as they appear on gnome-look they are no longer synonymous > with > the brand and will not be used? > I don't believe that is the case with Ubuntu. It might be with smaller distros in their "pool", but I seriously doubt that affe

Re: [ubuntu-art] art concept

On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 2:00 PM, Michael Stephenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 2008/8/4 Matthew Nuzum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> >> There are a ton of icons. If you just want to make a subtle change you >> can re-use the icons from another theme, but if you want to make a >> radical change (like flat

Re: [ubuntu-art] art concept

2008/8/4 Matthew Nuzum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > There are a ton of icons. If you just want to make a subtle change you > can re-use the icons from another theme, but if you want to make a > radical change (like flat icons) then you need to make a bunch. This > takes a lot of ambition and a motivate

Re: [ubuntu-art] Again, top-posting. (*sigh*)

On Mon, 2008-08-04 at 12:09 -0500, Matthew Nuzum wrote: > We need to be careful to avoid putting too many barriers in place. > Nothing stifles creativity and enthusiasm more than getting hit with a > laundry list of rules and regulations you must comply with (well, > except maybe getting caught up

Re: [ubuntu-art] art concept

Thanks for the heads up. I didn't understand the level of bureaucracy that is involved to make improvements to Ubuntu. I'm just wondering, the only difference I notice between updates is a background change. Why do we have an art-group just for making a background? On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 12:39 PM

Re: [ubuntu-art] Again, top-posting. (*sigh*)

On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 11:37 AM, Salane Ashcraft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Please follow well established etiquette or don't post to the list. >> >> http://www.ubuntu.com/support/community/mailinglists/etiquette#head-c70bc55ce24849bd82885e8b0f7e972465944b5a >> >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/To

Re: [ubuntu-art] Again, top-posting. (*sigh*)

[snip] > Please follow well established etiquette or don't post to the list. [snip] > -Cory K. Sorry! Did not mean to make your life more difficult through my ignorance of well established etiquette. Will try to do better. -- ubuntu-art mailing list ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubun

Re: [ubuntu-art] Again, top-posting. (*sigh*)

Salane Ashcraft wrote: > On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 11:33 AM, Cory K. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Alexi Helligar wrote: >> >>> Don't know about the "top-posting" business. I use Gmail and I just >>> reply to messages I receive. >>> >> Please follow well established etiquette or don't

Re: [ubuntu-art] Wall-light

On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 12:27 PM, Cory K. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Michael wrote: >> On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 12:16 PM, Salane Ashcraft <[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > wrote: >> >> On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 11:06 AM, Ashton <[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > w

Re: [ubuntu-art] art concept

On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 11:19 AM, Michael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I don't exactly understand what you mean by flat icons are tricky to > implement. There are a ton of icons. If you just want to make a subtle change you can re-use the icons from another theme, but if you want to make a radical

Re: [ubuntu-art] Again, top-posting. (*sigh*)

On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 11:33 AM, Cory K. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Alexi Helligar wrote: >> Don't know about the "top-posting" business. I use Gmail and I just >> reply to messages I receive. > > Please follow well established etiquette or don't post to the list. > > http://www.ubuntu.com/suppor

Re: [ubuntu-art] Again, top-posting. (*sigh*)

Alexi Helligar wrote: > Don't know about the "top-posting" business. I use Gmail and I just > reply to messages I receive. Please follow well established etiquette or don't post to the list. http://www.ubuntu.com/support/community/mailinglists/etiquette#head-c70bc55ce24849bd82885e8b0f7e972465944b

Re: [ubuntu-art] Wall-light

Michael wrote: > On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 12:16 PM, Salane Ashcraft <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 11:06 AM, Ashton <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 9:54 AM, Vadim Peretok

Re: [ubuntu-art] Wall-light

On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 11:54 AM, Vadim Peretokin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 11:52 AM, Klaus Bitto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> >>> Still didn't get it. There's a setting in Gmail somewhere or simply >>> start typing at the bottom. ;) >> >> There isn't a setting, but y

Re: [ubuntu-art] Wall-light

On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 11:20 AM, Michael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Just wondering, why do the concepts never happen? Does no one make them, or > do they just get rejected by the community? > Being rejected by the community is not a problem if you think about it. There are tons of themes out the

Re: [ubuntu-art] Wall-light

On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 11:20 AM, Michael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Just wondering, why do the concepts never happen? Does no one make them, or > do they just get rejected by the community? > > On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 12:16 PM, Salane Ashcraft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 a

Re: [ubuntu-art] art concept

On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 11:19 AM, Michael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I don't exactly understand what you mean by flat icons are tricky to > implement. And you make an interesting point about the bright menus. I would > be interested in researching that a bit further. But I agree that the > backgro

Re: [ubuntu-art] Wall-light

Just wondering, why do the concepts never happen? Does no one make them, or do they just get rejected by the community? On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 12:16 PM, Salane Ashcraft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 11:06 AM, Ashton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, Aug 4, 2008

Re: [ubuntu-art] art concept

I don't exactly understand what you mean by flat icons are tricky to implement. And you make an interesting point about the bright menus. I would be interested in researching that a bit further. But I agree that the background image, the flat theme, and the icons are pretty cool. Just wondering, wh

Re: [ubuntu-art] Wall-light

On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 11:06 AM, Ashton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 9:54 AM, Vadim Peretokin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: >> >> >> On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 11:52 AM, Klaus Bitto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> wrote: Still didn't get it. There's a setting in Gmail somewhe

Re: [ubuntu-art] Wall-light

On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 9:54 AM, Vadim Peretokin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > > > On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 11:52 AM, Klaus Bitto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > >> Still didn't get it. There's a setting in Gmail somewhere or simply >>> start typing at the bottom. ;) >>> >> >> There isn't a setting, but yo

Re: [ubuntu-art] art concept

On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 12:51 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi guys. I'm new here, but I just wanted to share a great concept that I > found for ubuntu. > First of all, this design got the front page on Digg, so it's really a great > concept. you can check it out at > http://willwill100.devianta

Re: [ubuntu-art] Wall-light

On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 11:52 AM, Klaus Bitto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Still didn't get it. There's a setting in Gmail somewhere or simply >> start typing at the bottom. ;) >> > > There isn't a setting, but you can simply hit Ctrl+End once you opened the > reply window. > Related question, ar

Re: [ubuntu-art] Wall-light

> > Still didn't get it. There's a setting in Gmail somewhere or simply > start typing at the bottom. ;) > There isn't a setting, but you can simply hit Ctrl+End once you opened the reply window. -- ubuntu-art mailing list ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubun

Re: [ubuntu-art] Wall-light

On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 11:46 AM, Cory K. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Michael wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 11:11 AM, Cory K. <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > wrote: > > > > Alexi Helligar wrote: > > > On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 8:12 AM, Vadim Peretokin > > <[EMAIL PR

Re: [ubuntu-art] Wall-light

Michael wrote: > On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 11:11 AM, Cory K. <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > wrote: > > Alexi Helligar wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 8:12 AM, Vadim Peretokin > <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: > > > >> Hi, > >> > >>

Re: [ubuntu-art] Wall-light

I suspect part of the issue is that people are associating new and fresh themes with OS X or Vista, since those both were there 'first'. Like... *is* there a nice, new, theme that's not associated with them by anyone? -- ubuntu-art mailing list ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com

Re: [ubuntu-art] Wall-light

Sorry for the top post, I'm new to mailing list etiquette. Yeah, I noticed the OSX influence on it, but does that mean we should avoid it? Look at AWN, it's popular because it's functional, yet it was derived from OSX. I was just posting this as inspiration. I'm not suggesting ubuntu ships with AWN

Re: [ubuntu-art] Wall-light

Ill Try and see if g-mail would like to work this time :P Hello, Although nice, I'm not sure this is the best way forward for the ubuntu look & feel. Its some sort of a OS X , Vista love child. Ubuntu must offer something more out there, beautiful but yet 180o from what is deemed to be the GUI

Re: [ubuntu-art] Wall-light

Alexi Helligar wrote: > On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 8:12 AM, Vadim Peretokin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I'd just like to show my support, as many other people positively had, for >> this theme: http://digg.com/linux_unix/Intrepid_Ibex_Mockup_Designs >> >> Cheers. > > This theme is a cl

Re: [ubuntu-art] some artwork for Ubuntu Brainstorm

These icons are interesting but lack a certain presence. Perhaps adding some contrast and adding a 40% to 60% gray blended border shadow would help? On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 3:51 AM, Thorsten Wilms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, 2008-08-03 at 21:53 +0300, Anton Kerezov wrote: > >> > http://t

Re: [ubuntu-art] Wall-light

This theme is a closer to what I think Ubuntu should be working towards for Intrepid. I don't think there should be as many rounded corners as in the mock-ups. On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 8:12 AM, Vadim Peretokin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > I'd just like to show my support, as many other peopl

Re: [ubuntu-art] art concept

On Aug 4, 2008, at 7:41 AM, "Matthew Nuzum" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 6:55 AM, Cory K. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> Wow. Why don't we just use OSX or Windows? >> > > That criticism is not helpful. Please see our guidelines about posting > responses comparing someone

Re: [ubuntu-art] art concept

Matthew Nuzum wrote: > On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 6:55 AM, Cory K. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Wow. Why don't we just use OSX or Windows? >> > > That criticism is not helpful. Please see our guidelines about posting > responses comparing someone's artwork to another OS: > https://lists.ubun

Re: [ubuntu-art] art concept

On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 6:55 AM, Cory K. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Wow. Why don't we just use OSX or Windows? > That criticism is not helpful. Please see our guidelines about posting responses comparing someone's artwork to another OS: https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-art/2007-December

Re: [ubuntu-art] art concept

is this it? https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Artwork/Incoming/Long_Term_Vision?action=AttachFile&do=get&target=LTV_WindowandGlobalMenu.png On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 10:35 AM, shadowh511 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Aug 4, 2008, at 7:24 AM, Michael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Yeah, I think trying a

Re: [ubuntu-art] art concept

On Aug 4, 2008, at 7:24 AM, Michael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Yeah, I think trying a new theme that still resembles the colors of Ubunut would be a great hit. BTW, who actually makes the decisions as to what is shipped with Ubuntu? Thanks On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 9:18 AM, Justin Dugger <[E

Re: [ubuntu-art] art concept

Michael wrote: > On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 9:18 AM, Justin Dugger <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 6:55 AM, Cory K. <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > wrote: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> Hi

Re: [ubuntu-art] art concept

Yeah, I think trying a new theme that still resembles the colors of Ubunut would be a great hit. BTW, who actually makes the decisions as to what is shipped with Ubuntu? Thanks On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 9:18 AM, Justin Dugger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 6:55 AM, Cory K. <[EMA

Re: [ubuntu-art] art concept

On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 8:24 AM, Cory K. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The sarcasm passed right over you. :P > > -Cory K. Sorry. Someone offered the same sentiment on IRC and I think they were serious. Perhaps Linux Hater broke my sarcasm meter? Justin Dugger -- ubuntu-art mailing list ubuntu

Re: [ubuntu-art] art concept

Justin Dugger wrote: > On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 6:55 AM, Cory K. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> >>> Hi guys. I'm new here, but I just wanted to share a great concept that >>> I found for ubuntu. >>> First of all, this design got the front page on Digg, so it's rea

Re: [ubuntu-art] art concept

On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 6:55 AM, Cory K. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> Hi guys. I'm new here, but I just wanted to share a great concept that >> I found for ubuntu. >> First of all, this design got the front page on Digg, so it's really a >> great concept. you can check it

Re: [ubuntu-art] Wall-light

Hello, On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 1:12 PM, Vadim Peretokin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > Hi, > > I'd just like to show my support, as many other people positively had, for > this theme: http://digg.com/linux_unix/Intrepid_Ibex_Mockup_Designs > > Cheers. > > -- > ubuntu-art mailing list > ubuntu-art@

[ubuntu-art] Wall-light

Hi, I'd just like to show my support, as many other people positively had, for this theme: http://digg.com/linux_unix/Intrepid_Ibex_Mockup_Designs Cheers. -- ubuntu-art mailing list ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art

Re: [ubuntu-art] art concept

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hi guys. I'm new here, but I just wanted to share a great concept that > I found for ubuntu. > First of all, this design got the front page on Digg, so it's really a > great concept. you can check it out at > http://willwill100.deviantart.com/art/Interpid-Ibex-Mockup-Part

Re: [ubuntu-art] some artwork for Ubuntu Brainstorm

В 09:51 +0200 на 04.08.2008 (пн), Thorsten Wilms написа: > On Sun, 2008-08-03 at 21:53 +0300, Anton Kerezov wrote: > > > > http://thorwil.wordpress.com/2008/08/03/ubuntu-brainstorm-help-3/ > > > > Nice work man! Just one question: the gears illustrate work and progress, > > right? > > I don't kn

Re: [ubuntu-art] some artwork for Ubuntu Brainstorm

On Sun, 2008-08-03 at 21:53 +0300, Anton Kerezov wrote: > > http://thorwil.wordpress.com/2008/08/03/ubuntu-brainstorm-help-3/ > > Nice work man! Just one question: the gears illustrate work and progress, > right? > I don't know why everybody uses gears to show this but IMO it a little bit > str