Daniel Borgmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 4/4/06, bvc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:> Yes, it doesn't look good, but neither does it look good square else we> wouldn't be having this discussion. Look at how the industrial engine deals> with it. Everything is round but there are no gaps.Which is a p
(Disclaimer: I know this is far from a final release, and that the artwork is
also experimental at this state.
It even says so in the login graphic! These are my immediate thoughts, straight
of the chest and written as I played around)
After booting the LiveCD I was initially impressed by the
Hello,
Very good job. I'm stutter between first and last.
Étienne.
--
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art
moin moin ;-)
I am such an user, who doesn't know the difference - and I tell you - I
am confused about that really big Logout-"picture" with so many options.
In Germany we sometimes say "weniger ist mehr" (less is more) and so I
agree with Henrik. Those users, who want to use "hibernate" will
> How about something along the lines of this:
> http://ramnet.se/~nisse/diverse/temp/synaptic-proposal.png ?
> Installed packages are in color, uninstalled packages are in monocrome
> and toned down.
>
> The good thing about this solution is that the shapes are more
> distinguishable this way, t
Sebastian Heinlein wrote:
hello,
I "designed" the original package status icons in synaptic. It would be
nice if someone could do some tango styled ones. The icons have to
reflect the status of the package:
[snip]
New icons don't need to follow my old metaphor:
At the moment I use a fil
Mark Shuttleworth a écrit :
> Henrik Nilsen Omma wrote:
>> IMO it would be best to only show one of these options to the average
>> user. (It would be useful to have some real-world data on which of
>> these people use most often -- sleep I guess -- and how many people
>> regularly use both options
On di, 2006-04-04 at 23:54 +0200, Richard Stellingwerff wrote:
> I've made a few new mockups:
> http://stellingwerff.com/ubuntu-art/sb.png
The first one, definitely :)
--
Dennis K.
- Linux for human beings - http://www.ubuntu.com
- Linux voor iedereen - http://www.ubuntu-nl.org
signature.as
On 4/4/06, Mark Shuttleworth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>bvc wrote:
> Yes, it doesn't look good, but neither does it look good square else we
> wouldn't be having this discussion. Look at how the industrial engine deals
> with it. Everything is round but there are no gaps.
>
>
> I
Mark Shuttleworth wrote:
Henrik Nilsen Omma wrote:
IMO it would be best to only show one of these options to the average
user. (It would be useful to have some real-world data on which of
these people use most often -- sleep I guess -- and how many people
regularly use both options.
Except the
Henrik Nilsen Omma wrote:
IMO it
would be best to only show one of these options to the average user.
(It would be useful to have some real-world data on which of these
people use most often -- sleep I guess -- and how many people regularly
use both options.
Except there's a darn good reaso
Andy Somerville wrote:
I think theres hardly anyone (who doesnt know beforehand) who thinks
the hibernate/sleep functionality is clear. Maybe its been suggested
before, but should we consider renaming these? (regardless of what
other changes are made)
IMO it would be best to only show one of th
Manu Cornet wrote:
As a matter of fact, I seldom do mere mockups, most of the time I also
write actual patches (and I sent this one to Seb by email along with
those captures) :) Seems like it is on its way to be uploaded soon.
Rock star :-)
Huh, did I misunderstand the meaning of "fac
Eric Feliksik wrote:
Matthew East
wrote:
Just to stick in two more cents, I agree with
mpt: a logout dialogue
that needs explanatory text is _really_ doing something wrong. The
labels and the icons should be clear enough.
Matt
Ok, but then the real quest
bvc wrote:
Yes, it doesn't look good, but neither does it look good
square else we wouldn't be having this discussion. Look at how the
industrial engine deals with it. Everything is round but there are no
gaps.
I don't like the fake solution - let's see a mockup with square
steppers and round
Hi !
> > http://www.manucornet.net/ubuntu/dev/dialog.png
> > http://www.manucornet.net/ubuntu/dev/logout.png
> > http://www.manucornet.net/ubuntu/dev/hibernate.png
> Interesting!
>
> I quite like the explanatory text. Daniel, is that easy to factor in?
As a matter of fact, I seldo
On 4/4/06, Petr Tomeš <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2006/4/4, Sandis Neilands <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > I agree with you. So far i haven't seen any advantage in using
> > ubuntu's custom logout instead of gnome's default. I know this is
> > unpopular but
> > 1) If the new logout doesn't solve more (o
2006/4/4, Sandis Neilands <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I agree with you. So far i haven't seen any advantage in using
> ubuntu's custom logout instead of gnome's default. I know this is
> unpopular but
> 1) If the new logout doesn't solve more (or more important) problems
> than it creates or
> 2) we are
2006/4/4, Daniel Borgmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Which is a primary reason why I couldn't stand Industrial anymore and
> was hoping for something like Clearlooks to show up, which uses
> roundness in a more sensible way.
A agree with you. I have been still hoping for Clearlooks direction
(using ro
Hello!
On 4/4/06, Eric Feliksik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ok, but then the real question is, then: Do you think it's clear, now?
> Do you think Aunt Tilly understands the difference between hibernation,
> shutdown and sleep? Logout and switch user?
>
> I personally don't think so. So we either
Matthew East wrote:
Just to stick in two more cents, I agree with mpt: a logout dialogue
that needs explanatory text is _really_ doing something wrong. The
labels and the icons should be clear enough.
Matt
Ok, but then the real question is, then: Do you think it's clear, now?
Do you think Au
On 4/4/06, bvc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes, it doesn't look good, but neither does it look good square else we
> wouldn't be having this discussion. Look at how the industrial engine deals
> with it. Everything is round but there are no gaps.
Which is a primary reason why I couldn't stand Ind
Yes, it doesn't look good, but neither does it look good square else we wouldn't be having this discussion. Look at how the industrial engine deals with it. Everything is round but there are no gaps.BillyMark Shuttleworth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:bvc wrote: Let's not forget the range slide
El mar, 04-04-2006 a las 13:12 +1000, Pascal Klein escribió:
> On Mon, 2006-04-03 at 22:49 +0200, Étienne Bersac wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > > The supported status icons aren't to good, and they are only a
> > > proof of
> > > concept. Perhaps, when a water mark icon they could look ok, but I
>
> >
> > * "Log out" as the name of the menu entry is definitely misleading, and
> > we're trying to find the best wording to replace it (suggestions
> > welcome !).
How about 'Leave the Computer'
--
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubun
Manu Cornet wrote:
Here's a new version of the dialog :
http://www.manucornet.net/ubuntu/dev/dialog.png
http://www.manucornet.net/ubuntu/dev/logout.png
http://www.manucornet.net/ubuntu/dev/hibernate.png
Interesting!
Many people found that the dialog was too large ; therefore, I stack
Henrik Nilsen Omma wrote:
Here is a
mock-up to illustrate:
http://people.ubuntu.com/~henrik/images/rounded-progress.png
I appreciate where that's going, but I think it looks wrong because the
lines on the progressbar are themselves vertical and straight. So let's
leave that one for now. The
bvc wrote:
Let's not forget the range slider trough
http://kwh.kernow-gb.com/~bvc/dapper-xubu/progress-scroll-trough.png
This has the problem Richard identified, that when the scrollbar is all
the way up or down, you have a rounded scrollbar against a rounded
stepper, which looks bong :-)
Daniel Borgmann wrote:
On 4/3/06, Mark Shuttleworth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
While we are here I'm reminded of one additional thing I'd like to see
mocked up. On the scrollbars, the white tips at each end might look even
better if they had slightly rounded corners like the slide
Eric Feliksik wrote:
In a matter
of taste, I understand the sabdfl has the final word... However, maybe
I can make him see the light:
I would never claim to have perfect taste, and I am certainly looking
for someone who is better qualified to step up and be hired as the art
director for Ubu
On Mon, 2006-04-03 at 22:49 +0200, Étienne Bersac wrote:
> Hello,
>
> > The supported status icons aren't to good, and they are only a
> > proof of
> > concept. Perhaps, when a water mark icon they could look ok, but I
> > think
> > they won't with 16x16 size.
> >
>
> Very nice. But clearly
31 matches
Mail list logo
