Re: [UAI] Where to draw the line--the problem of binarization

2007-02-27 Thread Peter Tillers
Dear Lotfi & Other Colleagues, Lotfi, thank you for your kind words. Many years ago a wise friend told me that flattery is never insincere. In that spirit, I accept your compliments. But, my dear colleagues, I am emboldened by Lotfi's words to offer a suggestion: Study of the legal appl

[UAI] Where to draw the line--the problem of binarization

2007-02-27 Thread Jonathan Lawry
Dear Lotfi Thanks for your interesting and thought provoking posting. In my view the issue of drawing boundaries for fuzzy concepts is of fundamental importance to understanding the use of such concepts in natural language. In particular, I would make the following observation. As part of everyday

Re: [UAI] Where to draw the line--the problem of binarization

2007-02-27 Thread Lotfi A. Zadeh
Dear all, The AI community and I, personally, owe Professor Tillers an expression of appreciation for his erudite, authoritative and insightful comment on the problem of "Where to drawn the line"--a problem which plays a particular important role in the realm of law and legal reasoning. Pr

Re: [UAI] Where to draw the line--the problem of binarization

2007-02-01 Thread Rubin, Stuart SPAWAR
Lotfi, hope this reply finds you well. As I recall, Robinson in his legal book, Uniform Commercial Code, 3d edition (circa 1973) refers to legal arguments made by one Judge Cardozo that describes when a precedent is an acceptable legal precedent. He recognizes the failure of "binarization" and to t

[UAI] Where to draw the line--the problem of binarization

2007-01-23 Thread Lotfi A. Zadeh
Dear all, Is the sectarian conflict in Iraq a civil war? Was torture practiced in Guantanamo? What is pornography? What is reasonable doubt? These are everyday instances of the question: Where to draw the line? As someone pointed out, the U.S. Constitution is an invitation to argumentation