Hi
My submission below went through several iterations, the last of which
was requests to squash some commits. I *think* I performed all the
requested modifications several months ago.
I am new with this email-based patch system so not sure if I'm missing
a step in the submission/review process a
Hi All
Last I see is version 4 of a patchset that is almost a year old with
some change requests within
- [PATCH v4 1/2] dm: mdio: add a uclass for MDIO
(https://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2018-July/334118.html)
- [PATCH v4 2/2] mdio: add marvell MDIO driver
(https://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u
Hi Alex
In another thread (https://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2019-June/371933.html)
I asked Ken (before learning of their cut-backs) if I should take a
stab at re-integrating his work
where Joe also pointed out the impending acceptance of your work.
I'm not sure where we left off here in thi
Sorry for the late input
The cp110s have an mdio and an xmdio so
Locally I have been naming them cpm-xmdio, cpm-mdio, cps-xmdio, cps-mdio
I knew the new field is coming but didn't catch that the 'dtsi's patch
On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 8:30 PM Joe Hershberger wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 10:
Sorry for the late input
The cp110s have an mdio and an xmdio so
Locally I have been naming them cpm-xmdio, cpm-mdio, cps-xmdio, cps-mdio
I knew the new field is coming but didn't catch that the 'dtsi's patch
[also apologies if you get this a second time]
On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 8:30 PM Joe Her
amp; "cps-mdio"
On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 1:03 PM Nevo Hed wrote:
>
> Sorry for the late input
>
> The cp110s have an mdio and an xmdio so
> Locally I have been naming them cpm-xmdio, cpm-mdio, cps-xmdio, cps-mdio
>
> I knew the new field is coming but didn't catch
t_int().
> >
> > This squahses a subsequent fix by same author
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Igal Liberman
> > Reviewed-by: Kostya Porotchkin
> > Reviewed-by: Stefan Chulski
> > Signed-off-by: Nevo Hed
> > ---
> >
> > drivers/net/mvpp2.c |
On Wed, Aug 14, 2019 at 11:39 AM Joe Hershberger
wrote:
>
> On Fri, Aug 2, 2019 at 12:54 PM wrote:
> >
> > From: Ken Ma
> >
> > -
> > -static int mvpp2_recv(struct udevice *dev, int flags, uchar **packetp)
> > +int mvpp2_recv(struct udevice *dev, int flags, uchar **packetp)
>
> Why does this ne
8 matches
Mail list logo