Need advise with u-boot on SH-7785LCR

x to be better suited to modern versions of u-boot in the future. For now, it would be a great help if anyone could help me with the hanging boot issue. Thanks, Adrian -- .''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz : :' : Debian Developer `. `' Physicist `-GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913

Re: Need advise with u-boot on SH-7785LCR

he "erase" command will erase the flash. But there doesn't seem to be a "program" command. Adrian -- .''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz : :' : Debian Developer `. `' Physicist `-GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913

Re: Need advise with u-boot on SH-7785LCR

p 30 12:35 /dev/mtdblock3 root@tirpitz:~> So, I assume, I should just be able to write u-boot.bin to /dev/mtdblock0? Adrian -- .''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz : :' : Debian Developer `. `' Physicist `-GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913

Re: Need advise with u-boot on SH-7785LCR

s and why the latter doesn't work. I have uploaded both versions here: > https://people.debian.org/~glaubitz/u-boot-sh7785lcr/ Maybe someone with more experience can spot anything obvious like incorrect address offsets etc. PS: I'm actually called Adrian, despite the long name ;-

u-boot fails to build on sparc64 due redefinition of 'struct termio'

1] > https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=u-boot&arch=sparc64&ver=2023.07%2 > Bdfsg-1&stamp=1699723544&raw=0 -- .''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz : :' : Debian Developer `. `' Physicist `-GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913

Re: u-boot fails to build on sparc64 due redefinition of 'struct termio'

Hi Simon, On Wed, 2023-11-15 at 06:40 -0700, Simon Glass wrote: > Hi Adrian, > > On Wed, 15 Nov 2023 at 00:27, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz > wrote: > > > > Hello! > > > > On Linux sparc64, building u-boot fails with [1]: > > > > cc -o tools/

Re: U-Boot support for M68K removal

On Mon, 2023-01-30 at 17:22 +0100, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > FWIW, m68k is still a very actively maintained architecture in the > Linux kernel and userland with even LLVM and Rust having recently > added support for m68k. > > I also own a Coldfire board myself (not sure wh

Re: U-Boot support for M68K removal

Hi Greg! On Mon, 2023-02-06 at 22:02 +1000, Greg Ungerer wrote: > I wish I had a 54415 based board in my collection. Would make it so > much easier to keep the kernel working on it :-( Maybe we can find one to buy for you. I would be happy to donate for it. Adrian -- .''`.

Re: U-Boot support for M68K removal

On Mon, 2023-02-06 at 13:25 +0100, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > On Mon, 2023-02-06 at 22:02 +1000, Greg Ungerer wrote: > > I wish I had a 54415 based board in my collection. Would make it so > > much easier to keep the kernel working on it :-( > > Maybe we can find

[U-Boot] Problems booting Linux 3.18 on SH7785LCR

Image-3.18 Does anyone know what could be wrong such that the kernel wouldn't boot as shown above? Cheers, Adrian > [1] ftp://ftp.debian-ports.org/debian/pool-sh4/main/l/linux/linux-image-3.18.0-trunk-sh7785lcr_3.18.3-1~exp1_sh4.deb -- .''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz

[U-Boot] Problems booting Linux 3.18 on SH7785LCR

Image-3.18 Does anyone know what could be wrong such that the kernel wouldn't boot as shown above? Cheers, Adrian > [1] ftp://ftp.debian-ports.org/debian/pool-sh4/main/l/linux/linux-image-3.18.0-trunk-sh7785lcr_3.18.3-1~exp1_sh4.deb -- .''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz

Re: U-Boot support for M68K removal

8k is still a very actively maintained architecture in the Linux kernel and userland with even LLVM and Rust having recently added support for m68k. I also own a Coldfire board myself (not sure which one without looking), so I can offer to test U-Boot patches in the future. Adrian -- .'

Re: [PATCH] sh: cache: Fill in invalidate_icache_all()

) > > > > > > Thanks for filling this in, I wasn't sure how the implementation would > > > look from a quick skim of the linux kernel code. > > I believe it should look like the above, but lemme CC Geert to be on the > > safe side. > > I have n