that some bootloaders will detect any "extra" bytes after
the end of the zImage data and assume that they are a rootfs image. Is
that how U-Boot does it? I just cat the ziminage and rootfs.cpio.gz
files together and then prepend a uImage header?
--
Grant Edwards grant.b.e
On 2012-05-22, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> In message Grant Edwards wrote:
[...]
>> somebody told me that if I was using U-Boot, I could build the zImage
>> and rootfs separately and then combine them into a single uImage file
>> for distribution.
>
> The (deprecated)
. Availability for respective links.
Brilliant! I've been looking for that for a while...
Thanks again,
--
Grant Edwards grant.b.edwardsYow! Will it improve my
at CASH FLOW?
gmail.com
_
something like this:
nand_info[0].read(nand_info+0, offset, sizeof(buffer), &len, buffer)
nand_info[0].write(nand_info+0, offset, bytecount, &len, buffer)
but, I have a feeling that's not right (though it seems to work, I
On 2010-08-13, Grant Edwards wrote:
> On 2010-07-09, Scott Wood wrote:
>> On Fri, Jul 09, 2010 at 08:56:40AM -0400, Ben Gardiner wrote:
>>
>>> If you are putting an MTD filesystem in that partition then the
>>> filesystem itself will take care of bad blocks that
On 2010-08-16, Scott Wood wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 09:22:21PM +0000, Grant Edwards wrote:
> At one point in the legacy NAND code, a distinction was made when
> reading between completely skipping bad blocks, and filling the
> buffer with zeroes in place of the bad blocks. I
;t "our bareboard system doesn't support Ethernet" preclude the
use of Ethernet (UDP or otherwise)?
> Maybe you can implement a server on your hardware?
What sort of server?
--
Grant Edwards grant.b.edwardsYow! If I pull
Making U-Boot the tftp server and our "restore"
program the client solved several problems. I also find have U-Boot
be the server is a lot more convenient for development use. [It also
U-Boot commands to be sent via the tftp protocol.]
I thought about submitting patches (it's pret
On 2010-08-23, Ben Warren wrote:
> On 8/23/2010 2:10 PM, Grant Edwards wrote:
>> Now that you mention it, I have implemented a tftp server for U-Boot.
>>
>> We needed a way to recover "bricked" units in the field, and there's
>> simply no way we cou
27;s pretty much a stand-alone
>> addition except for 3-4 lines in net.[ch]). But it was made
>> abundantly clear that tftp server code for U-Boot would never be
>> considered -- I was scolded for even asking about it.
>
> Maybe I can talk you into posting the patches? It
ut I don't see how it's useful
since you have to know a-priori the address of the machine from
which you want to use it. It would seem that you have to force
the customer to change the IP address of their machine (not
acceptible).
--
Grant Edwards gran
>> the customer to change the IP address of their machine (not
>> acceptible).
>
> Why am I not surprised that this is not acceptable, either?
Because it's not something our customers are willing to do.
I take it that your position is that everying that U-Boot
doesn't
part of the SAM-BA utility -- and that's only because I'm too
lazy to fix Atmel's Makefiles so they call the compiler with the
proper flags.
--
Grant Edwards grant.b.edwardsYow! Are we THERE yet?
at
ocumentation or procedure to do that?
Send the hex file to the flash distributor and have them do it.
--
Grant Edwards grant.b.edwardsYow! I'm meditating on
at the FORMALDEHYDE and the
gmail.com
I'm working on a Renesas supplied port of U-Boot, and it seems that
'make' always compiles every single (configured) source file instead
compiling only the source files that have been changed since the
previous 'make'. I've never run into this before on projects that use
'make', and it makes devel
On 2022-01-25, Grant Edwards wrote:
> I'm working on a Renesas supplied port of U-Boot, and it seems that
> 'make' always compiles every single (configured) source file instead
> compiling only the source files that have been changed since the
> previous 'ma
What is the "right" way to modify a defconfig file?
Most sources I've found just say things like "edit the defconfig
file". That seems error-prone -- especially when dealing with settings
that have side effects.
I did stumble across one mention of "make savedefconfig", and this
seems to be the ri
17 matches
Mail list logo