[U-Boot] [PATCH 0/2] make u-boot/drivers/net/designware cache supportive

2013-01-22 Thread Frank Dols
driver able to work in a cached environment (do I$/D$ flush/invalidate where necessary). Frank Dols (2): drivers/net/designware, do an explicit memory access instead of implicit, re-written assignments to use readl() and writel(), all of this as preperation for making the driver

[U-Boot] [PATCH 2/2] u-boot/drivers/net/designware with cache support.

2013-01-22 Thread Frank Dols
Signed-off-by: Frank Dols --- drivers/net/designware.c | 20 1 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/net/designware.c b/drivers/net/designware.c index 2f235d5..8e0508e 100644 --- a/drivers/net/designware.c +++ b/drivers/net/designware.c

[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2] drivers/net/designware, do an explicit memory access instead of implicit, re-written assignments to use readl() and writel(), all of this as preperation for making the driver able

2013-01-22 Thread Frank Dols
Signed-off-by: Frank Dols --- drivers/net/designware.c | 108 +++--- drivers/net/designware.h |4 +- 2 files changed, 66 insertions(+), 46 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/net/designware.c b/drivers/net/designware.c index bf21a08..2f235d5 100644

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2] drivers/net/designware, do an explicit memory access instead of implicit, re-written assignments to use readl() and writel(), all of this as preperation for making the driver

2013-01-24 Thread Frank Dols
> Hi Vipin, > On Wed, 23 Jan 2013 15:46:31 +0530, Vipin Kumar > wrote: > >> My first feeling is that the descriptors are allocated as Normal > >> Cachabale memory and it would not help to access them using readl/writel > >> ... > > And no, we don't need to allocate them non-cacheable, although i

[U-Boot] FW: [PATCH 1/2] drivers/net/designware, do an explicit memory access instead of implicit, re-written assignments to use readl() and writel(), all of this as preperation for making the driver

2013-03-01 Thread Frank Dols
[[ ... to get attention again ... see below ...]] On 2/8/2013 6:22 PM, Frank Dols wrote: > Good afternoon Vipin and Albert, > I where wondering, is there any review/update news on the patches I submitted > a short while ago? > Regards, Frank. > Sorry, first excluded " u-boot