Hi all
Just picking up this old thread again...
There seemed to be general agreement to host the firmware hand-off spec in a
separate repo with separate maintainers at TrustedFirmware.org, at least
initially. Arm intends to progress with the initial population of this repo. We
intend to use th
Hi Simon
A couple of important points:
* TF-A does not aim to replace U-Boot SPL; it aims to reduce fragmentation in
secure firmware. The permissive license may not be ideal but from an OSS PoV,
but it enables much wider adoption than other licensing schemes. But that's
perhaps a philosophical
Jose Marinho ; Simon Glass
> ; Dan Handley
> Cc: t...@lists.trustedfirmware.org; u-boot@lists.denx.de; boot-
> architect...@lists.linaro.org; nd
> Subject: RE: [TF-A] Re: [RFC] Proposed location to host the firmware handoff
> specification.
>
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for the emai
; boot-architect...@lists.linaro.org; Manish Pandey2
> ; Joanna Farley ;
> Ilias Apalodimas ; Matteo Carlini
> ; Dan Handley ; Rob
> Herring ; Harb Abdulhamid
> (h...@amperecomputing.com) ;
> Sivasakthivel Nainar ; Samer El-Haj-
> Mahmoud ; nd
> Subject: Re: [TF-A] [RFC] P
Hi Julius
> -Original Message-
> From: Julius Werner
> Sent: 06 December 2022 04:18
>
> It seems like some of us still have very different opinions about how this
> handoff structure should and shouldn't be used, which I really think need to
> be worked out and then codified in the spec
Hi all
> -Original Message-
> From: Masahiro Yamada [mailto:yamada.masah...@socionext.com]
> Sent: 05 October 2016 04:19
> Hi.
>
> Recently I implemented ARM Trusted Firmware BL31 for my SoCs.
>
> But, I am wondering how the boot-flow should be.
>
I'm no U-Boot expert but as ARM Trusted Fi
Hi Kever
> -Original Message-
> From: Kever Yang [mailto:kever.y...@rock-chips.com]
> Sent: 28 March 2017 08:23
>
> Hi Andre,
>
>
> On 03/23/2017 05:22 PM, Andre Przywara wrote:
> > Hi Kever,
> >
> > I was wondering if we really need to copy in all those ATF definitions.
> > I think this i
Hi
> -Original Message-
> From: Masahiro Yamada [mailto:yamada.masah...@socionext.com]
> Sent: 05 April 2017 06:36
>
> 2017-04-05 14:05 GMT+09:00 Kever Yang :
> > SPL is considered as BL2 in ATF terminology, it needs to load other
> > parts of ATF binary like BL31, BL32, SCP-BL30, and BL33
Hi Peng
> -Original Message-
> From: Peng Fan [mailto:peng@nxp.com]
> Sent: 25 October 2017 02:39
> > diff --git a/common/spl/spl_atf.c b/common/spl/spl_atf.c new file mode
> > 100644 index 000..ec3f675
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/common/spl/spl_atf.c
> > @@ -0,0 +1,92 @@
> > +/*
9 matches
Mail list logo
