On Mon, 23 Aug 2010 09:19:05 +0200, "Miroslav Petricek"
wrote:
> And here it hangs. I wonder if there is any way hot to reset u-boot
> settings. I mean some interrupt the POST by some magic key from serial
> consoler or something.
>
> Do you think there is any possibility to debrick my device?
On Mon, 30 Aug 2010 11:12:25 +0200, Detlev Zundel wrote:
> Sometimes I get the impression that we would save a lot of headache by
> starting afresh and porting the current Linux code into U-Boot thus
> leverage all this, but nobody yet dared to start such a feat.
>
If somebody starts over, it w
Resend, forgot to copy the list.
> On Mon, 30 Aug 2010 11:31:06 +0200, Detlev Zundel wrote:
>> Hi shulin,
>>
>>>Now I working on porting android fastboot protocol to U-boot,does
>>> somebody add fastboot protocol patches to U-boot?
>>
>> Can yopu please tell me what the "the android fastboot
On Mon, 30 Aug 2010 11:52:30 +0200, Detlev Zundel wrote:
> In the past this turned out not to be as easy as it sounds. The devil
> lurks in the details which become apparent only when starting on the
> job. But of course if somebody accomplishes this, I cannot imagine
> anyone from stopping him
On Mon, 30 Aug 2010 12:09:48 +0200, Detlev Zundel wrote:
> Yet another alternative for the problem already solved by DFU[1]? Damn,
> after some recent activity in this area again I was starting to raise my
> hopes that more people realize such a thing exists already :(
>
OK, there appears to b
On Mon, 30 Aug 2010 13:11:38 +0200, Detlev Zundel wrote:
> Is that fastboot usb-storage based? From the wiki-page that you
> referenced I only see that you also need a separate host tool to use it.
> So that's not much of a difference, is it?
>
No, the usb-storage based thing was something I h
On Thu, 02 Sep 2010 09:48:06 +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> And if we add such progress indicators, then we have
> to make sure it integrates well with existing use.
>
One could define a global environment variable or command to enable or
disable progress indicators. Just like "hash on" and "has
On Tue, 7 Sep 2010 18:13:12 +0530, Vaishali Dhakate
wrote:
> Hi,
> I am looking for the website where I could browse the u-boot source code for
> Hawkboard only.
> As I dont have access to Linux machine right now.
> plz tell.
> Thanks
> Vaishali.
>
>
Aren't they here?
http://git.denx.de/
http
On Wed, 29 Sep 2010 11:16:30 +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
>This allows to efficiently use the same U-Bot
The U-Bot strikes again :-)
--
Bas
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
On Mon, 04 Oct 2010 08:40:36 +0200, Rogan Dawes
wrote:
> For what it is worth, would it be possible to have a more verbose error
> message that actually provides a reference to what needs to be done,
> rather than simply failing with an obscure message about DRAM configuration?
>
Maybe somethin
On Mon, 15 Nov 2010 12:49:58 +0100, Albert ARIBAUD
wrote:
>
>> Do you think you could convert the remaining CPUs to ELF relocation as
>> well? That would probably provide the best base for any further work.
>
> I can make the changes for other cpus, but I cannot perform even basic
> testing b
Dear list,
A few days ago I tried to upgrade the bootloader of my AVR32 NGW100 based
development platform to the latest release of U-Boot (2010.06). I use
OpenWRT on it and also the U-boot provided with it.
At first, it didn't even compile. Secondly, it didn't work [1]. Reading
through the maili
On Mon, 2 Aug 2010 14:06:26 +0200, Haavard Skinnemoen
wrote:
> This series fixes a trivial build issue, as well as a longstanding
> problem with the 'saveenv' command on ATNGW100.
>
Is that the same problem that makes flash erase actions fail with the
error that the start or end address does no
On Mon, 02 Aug 2010 11:16:37 +0200, Reinhard Meyer
> check my patches named "add support for EMK TOP7000 board" from
> 04.June.2010.
>
> They will work on the NGW100 as well, and should apply even to the most
> recent u-boot.
>
> The FLASH will be recognized properly.
>
Hi Reinhard,
Thanks f
On Mon, 2 Aug 2010 14:43:36 +0200, Haavard Skinnemoen
wrote:
>> I had a problem with this version as well when the environment was
empty.
>> It said the flash was 4Gig and kept crashing with some DMA error
(NGW100
>> board).
>
> Ok, I wasn't aware of that problem. I don't think I've ever tried
On 08/02/2010 05:44 PM, Bas Mevissen wrote:
>
>> Ok, I wasn't aware of that problem. I don't think I've ever tried
>> running u-boot with empty environment; in fact, I'm not even sure how
>> you do that since it will fall back to a default environm
On Tue, 03 Aug 2010 23:28:58 +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Full ACK again.
>
> Reinhard, do you volunteer? For AVR32? Or also for AT91?
>
I would love to work with Reinhard and others to test and integrate stuff
for AVR32 NGW100 board. My target is to get current 2010.06 with patches
really
On Thu, 5 Aug 2010 15:41:35 +0200, Lasse Skov
wrote:
> Hi
>
> Im working on a target where I use the u-boot and think a little about
> good techniques for upgrade the BSP on the target and to make it fails
> saft.
>
> Is ther any helpeful things I can use in uboot for this.?
>
> My plan is to
On Thu, 05 Aug 2010 17:02:31 +0200, Albert ARIBAUD
wrote:
> Note that this does not protect agains the first BSP
> being buggy once booted, though, but there's little one can do against
> this.
>
Even then, there is a lot you can do. For example, U-Boot can detect being
started by a watchdog
19 matches
Mail list logo
