Hello Mike,
On Sunday, January 08, 2012 6:14 AM Mike Frysinger wrote:
> -Original Message-
> From: Mike Frysinger [mailto:vap...@gentoo.org]
> Sent: Sunday, January 08, 2012 6:14 AM
> To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
> Cc: Andrzej Pietrasiewicz; Kyungmin Park; Marek Szyprowski
&g
Hello Stefan,
On Wednesday, November 02, 2011 3:29 PM Stefan Shmidt wrote:
>
> Have you fully implemented 1.1? With the detahc logic inside the
> device implementation?
As you noticed in another post, the state machine is reused.
> Just curious. What version of dfu-util your are using for your
Hello Mike,
Thank you for your review. Please see my comments inline.
On Wednesday, November 02, 2011 4:16 PM Mike Frysinger wrote:
> >
> > Dear All,
> >
> > This is Device Firmware Upgrade (DFU) implementation which supports
> > data upload and download function to devices which are equipped wi
Hello Stefan,
On Wednesday, November 02, 2011 8:30 PM Stefan Schmidt writes:
>
> Agreed. The eMMC flashing with files on FAT is nothing goni specific.
> Others should be able to use this as well. I see three different parts
> here that can be separated:
I agree. Since there is interest in DFU i
nst HEAD and it failed for me. Anything I miss?
>
Sorry about that. I forgot to mention the reference. It is
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/122080
> On Wed, 2011-11-02 at 11:00, Andrzej Pietrasiewicz wrote:
> >
> > The implementation is split into two parts: the dfu gadget
>
On Thursday, November 03, 2011 11:33 AM Andrzej Pietrasiewicz wrote:
> >
> Sorry about that. I forgot to mention the reference. It is
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/122080
>
Sorry again. I meant http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/
Hello Stefan,
On Thursday, November 03, 2011 2:32 PM Stefan Schmidt wrote:
> >
> > > Sorry about that. I forgot to mention the reference. It is
> > > http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/122080
> > >
> > Sorry again. I meant http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/11122079
>
> Hmm, applied this one but t
Dear Wolfgang Denk,
Please see my comments inline.
On Thursday, November 03, 2011 7:14 PM Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> >
> > http://www.usb.org/developers/devclass_docs/DFU_1.1.pdf
> ...
DFU is part of USB; an extension to be precise, but an extension bound
so tightly to the design and philosophy of
Hello,
On Thursday, November 03, 2011 3:01 PM Stefan Schmidt wrote:
>
> o I will send out my not ready for mainline patch to give you and
> others an impression how it is tackled in my patch.
>
> o I like your split between dfu and flashing and also the addition of
> the dfu command. Could
Dear Wolfgang Denk,
Please see my comments inline.
> >
> > DFU is part of USB; an extension to be precise, but an extension
> bound
> > so tightly to the design and philosophy of USB that it is rather
> > inconceivable to separate the two.
>
> Could you please be so kind and explain which exact
is to provide board_dfu_init/cleanup
pair and call register_flash_entities.
Andrzej Pietrasiewicz (4):
dfu: protocol initial implementation
dfu: generic backend parts
dfu: command implementation
dfu: target-specific implementation for Goni
Makefile|1 +
board/samsung
Signed-off-by: Andrzej Pietrasiewicz
Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park
---
drivers/usb/gadget/Makefile |1 +
drivers/usb/gadget/dfu.c| 920 +++
drivers/usb/gadget/dfu.h| 171
include/dfu.h | 28 ++
include/flash_entity.h
Signed-off-by: Andrzej Pietrasiewicz
Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park
---
common/Makefile |1 +
common/cmd_dfu.c | 51 +++
2 files changed, 52 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 common/cmd_dfu.c
diff --git a/common/Makefile b
Signed-off-by: Andrzej Pietrasiewicz
Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park
---
board/samsung/goni/Makefile |2 +
board/samsung/goni/flash.c | 341 +++
board/samsung/goni/flash.h | 28
board/samsung/goni/goni.c | 17 ++
include/configs/s5p_goni.h
Signed-off-by: Andrzej Pietrasiewicz
Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park
---
Makefile |1 +
drivers/usb/dfu/Makefile | 33
drivers/usb/dfu/dfu.c| 109
drivers/usb/dfu/fat.c| 77
drivers
15 matches
Mail list logo
