[U-Boot] [PATCH] AT91: Added support for taskit Stamp9G20 and PortuxG20

Signed-off-by: Achim Ehrlich --- Makefile |9 ++ board/taskit/stamp9G20/Makefile| 56 ++ board/taskit/stamp9G20/config.mk |1 + board/taskit/stamp9G20/led.c | 35 ++ board/taskit/stamp9G20/partition.c | 40 +++ board/taskit

Re: [U-Boot] Taskit Portux920T port - Some issues

Hello, > Hi, > >> Hi, we are Enrico & Luca. > > Hi Enrico and Luca, welcome aboard! > >> We have tried to port u-boot to a Portux920T MiniPC. >> It seems we are successful, in fact u-boot brings up the device with no >> error and can boot a linux kernel. >> Ethernet driver works, dhcp works and

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] AT91: Added support for taskit Stamp9G20 and PortuxG20

Dear Wolfgang Denk, > > In message <4b7c14ec.7050...@taskit.de> you wrote: >> Signed-off-by: Achim Ehrlich >> --- > ... >> --- a/Makefile >> +++ b/Makefile >> @@ -2906,6 +2906,15 @@ TNY_A9260_config : unconfig >> @echo "

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] AT91: Added support for taskit Stamp9G20 and PortuxG20

Hello Detlef, >> Signed-off-by: Achim Ehrlich >> --- >> Makefile |9 ++ >> board/taskit/stamp9G20/Makefile| 56 ++ >> board/taskit/stamp9G20/config.mk |1 + >> board/taskit/stamp9G20/led.c |

[U-Boot] [PATCH] ARM change name of defines for AT91 arm926ejs

AT91_CPU_NAME to CONFIG_SYS_AT91_CPU_NAME AT91_MAIN_CLOCK to CONFIG_SYS_AT91_MAIN_CLOCK Signed-off-by: Achim Ehrlich --- board/atmel/at91cap9adk/at91cap9adk.c |2 +- board/atmel/at91sam9261ek/at91sam9261ek.c |2 +- board/atmel/at91sam9263ek/at91sam9263ek.c

[U-Boot] [PATCH] ARM change name of defines for AT91 arm926ejs

Configuration defines should be preceeded with CONFIG_SYS_. Renamed some at91 specific defines to conform to this naming convention: AT91_CPU_NAME to CONFIG_SYS_AT91_CPU_NAME AT91_MAIN_CLOCK to CONFIG_SYS_AT91_MAIN_CLOCK Signed-off-by: Achim Ehrlich --- board/atmel/at91cap9adk/at91cap9adk.c

Re: [U-Boot] U-BOOT porting to PORTUX 920T

Hello Luca, > > Thank to Achim Ehrlich - we got all we needed working! Timing has been > set to s$ > Basically - we have seen: > - dataflash working > - usb transfers ok > - environment > > We should test other hardware - hoping to get feedback, at least from

[U-Boot] [PATCH] [ARM] Convert at91 watchdog driver to new SoC access

This converts the at91 watchdog driver to new c structure type to access registers of the SoC Signed-off-by: Achim Ehrlich --- drivers/watchdog/at91sam9_wdt.c | 21 +++-- 1 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/at91sam9_wdt.c b/drivers

[U-Boot] [PATCH v2] [ARM] at91: Add support for taskit AT91SAM9G20 boards

This adds support for the AT91SAM9G20 boards by taskit GmbH. Both boards, Stamp9G20 and PortuxG20, are integrated in one file. PortuxG20 is basically a SBC built around Stamp9G20. Signed-off-by: Achim Ehrlich --- MAINTAINERS|5 + MAKEALL

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] [ARM] at91: Add support for taskit AT91SAM9G20 boards

Tom wrote: > Achim Ehrlich wrote: >> This adds support for the AT91SAM9G20 boards by taskit GmbH. >> Both boards, Stamp9G20 and PortuxG20, are integrated in one file. >> PortuxG20 is basically a SBC built around Stamp9G20. >> >> Signed-off-by: Achi

[U-Boot] [PATCH v3] [ARM] at91: Add support for taskit AT91SAM9G20 boards

This adds support for the AT91SAM9G20 boards by taskit GmbH. Both boards, Stamp9G20 and PortuxG20, are integrated in one file. PortuxG20 is basically a SBC built around Stam9G20. Signed-off-by: Achim Ehrlich --- MAINTAINERS|5 + MAKEALL

[U-Boot] Timeout in tftp.c

Hello, The timeout for lost packages in tftp.c is defined to 5000 msecs. But when setting the timeout get_timer(0) is called in NetSetTimeout in net.c. But on AT91 the timer code returns usecs and not msecs resulting in a timeout of 5 ms instead of 5 secs, which is kind of short. I looked in th

Re: [U-Boot] Timeout in tftp.c

Jens Gehrlein schrieb: > Wolfgang Denk schrieb: >> Dear Achim Ehrlich, >> >> In message <4a0969fc.2060...@taskit.de> you wrote: >>> The timeout for lost packages in tftp.c is defined to 5000 msecs. But >>> when setting the timeout get_timer(0) is call

Re: [U-Boot] Timeout in tftp.c

Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD schrieb: On 13:37 Wed 13 May , Achim Ehrlich wrote: Jens Gehrlein schrieb: Wolfgang Denk schrieb: Dear Achim Ehrlich, In message <4a0969fc.2060...@taskit.de> you wrote: The timeout for lost packages in tftp.c is defined to 5000 msecs. But when s

Re: [U-Boot] Timeout in tftp.c

lude/configs/stamp9G20.h b/include/configs/stamp9G20.h >> new file mode 100644 >> index 000..6c4a1b5 >> --- /dev/null >> +++ b/include/configs/stamp9G20.h >> @@ -0,0 +1,183 @@ >> +/* >> + * (C) Copyright 2007-2008 >> + * Stelian Pop >&

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3] [ARM] at91: Add support for taskit AT91SAM9G20 boards

Hello Tom, are there still objections to our patch or has it just got forgotten? Kind regards Achim -- product manager email:aehrl...@taskit.de Tel.: ++49 30 611295-25 Fax: ++49 30 611295-11 -- taskit GmbH Seelenbinderstr. 33 | D-12555 Berlin web:http://www.taskit.de Amtsgericht Charlotten