Re: [PATCH 2/6] sunxi: fix 32MB load address layout

Hi Andre, Dne sreda, 12. oktober 2022 ob 18:34:54 CEST je Andre Przywara napisal(a): > The default load addresses for the various payloads (kernel, DT, > ramdisk) on systems with just 32MB of DRAM have some issues: > For a start the preceding comment doesn't match the actual values: > apparently t

Re: [PATCH 3/6] sunxi: f1c100: move SKIP_LOWLEVEL_INIT_ONLY into Kconfig

Hi Andre, Dne sreda, 12. oktober 2022 ob 18:34:55 CEST je Andre Przywara napisal(a): > So far we stated the lack of a lowlevel() init function for the F1C100s > board by defining the respective SKIP_* symbol in the board's > defconfig. However we don't expect any *board* to employ such low level >

Re: [PATCH 4/6] sunxi: f1c100: add UART1 support

Hi Andre, Dne sreda, 12. oktober 2022 ob 18:34:56 CEST je Andre Przywara napisal(a): > Some boards use UART1 for its debug UART, so define the pins for the SPL > and the pinmux name and mux value for U-Boot proper. > > Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara > --- > arch/arm/mach-sunxi/board.c

Re: [PATCH 5/6] sunxi: f1c100: dtsi: add UART1 pins

Hi Andre, Dne sreda, 12. oktober 2022 ob 18:34:57 CEST je Andre Przywara napisal(a): > The F1Cx00 SoCs connect the first PortA pins to UART1. > > Add this to the SoC .dtsi, so boards can reference UART1 pins. > > Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara Reviewed-by: Jernej Skrabec Best regards, Jernej

Re: Bad Data CRC

Hi, On Wed, 12 Oct 2022 at 07:50, momo aubin wrote: > > Thanks Fabio and Simon, > > find attached the log picture. > When I changed the size of the one partition in the kernel, I got this > message. Does the calculation of CRC in uboot depended on the size ? It seems like your kernel is corrupt

Re: [PATCH 2/2] spl: spl_legacy: Fix printing image name

On Wed, 12 Oct 2022 at 13:47, Michal Suchanek wrote: > > image_set_name does not terminate the name in the image header. > > Then is should not be assument it's nul terminated. image_print_contents > correctly print only IH_NMLEN characters. > > Fix printing the unterminated field in spl_parse_leg

Re: [PATCH v6 18/20] dm: core: Non-activated device may be returned from uclass iterators that provide error handling

On Wed, 12 Oct 2022 at 13:58, Michal Suchanek wrote: > > Note in documentation that a non-activated device can be returned on > error. > > Signed-off-by: Michal Suchanek > --- > v6: - split off as separate patch > --- > include/dm/uclass.h | 12 > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4

Re: [PATCH v6 16/20] dm: core: Switch uclass_foreach_dev_probe to use simple iterator

On Wed, 12 Oct 2022 at 13:58, Michal Suchanek wrote: > > The return value is not used for anythig, and in a later patch the > behavior of the _err iterator will change in an incompatible way. > > Signed-off-by: Michal Suchanek > --- > v6: - split off as separate patch > --- > include/dm/uclass.h

Re: [PATCH v6 15/20] mpc83xx: gazerbeam: Update sysinfo_get error handling

On Wed, 12 Oct 2022 at 14:01, Michal Suchanek wrote: > > In a later patch sysinfo_get will be changed to return the device in cae > of an error. Set sysinfo to NULL on error to preserve previous behavior. > > Signed-off-by: Michal Suchanek > --- > board/gdsys/mpc8308/gazerbeam.c | 12 +--

Re: [PATCH v6 14/20] dm: pci: Update error handling in pci_sriov_init

On Wed, 12 Oct 2022 at 13:58, Michal Suchanek wrote: > > Check the returned value from pci_get_bus. After a later patch > uclass_first_device_err may return a device on error and then checking > that a device is returned will not suffice. > > Signed-off-by: Michal Suchanek > --- > v6: - split off

Re: [PATCH v6 01/20] dm: core: Fix uclass_probe_all to really probe all devices

On Wed, 12 Oct 2022 at 13:58, Michal Suchanek wrote: > > uclass_probe_all uses uclass_first_device/uclass_next_device assigning > the return value. > > The interface for getting meaningful error is > uclass_first_device_check/uclass_next_device_check, use it. > > Also do not stop iteration when an

Re: [PATCH v3] schemas: Add schema for U-Boot driver model 'phase tags'

Hi Rob, On Mon, 10 Oct 2022 at 10:34, Rob Herring wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 4, 2022 at 6:22 PM Simon Glass wrote: > > > > Until recently it has not been possible to add any U-Boot-specific > > properties to the device tree schema. Now that it is somewhat separated > > from Linux and people are feel

[PATCH] riscv: ae350: Check firmware_fdt_addr header

Check firmware_fdt_addr header to see if it is a valid fdt blob. Signed-off-by: Rick Chen --- board/AndesTech/ax25-ae350/ax25-ae350.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/board/AndesTech/ax25-ae350/ax25-ae350.c b/board/AndesTech/ax25-ae350/ax25-ae350.c index 36f0dd

RE: [EXT] Re: [REGRESSION]: v2022.07: SHA256 hash is broken on imx8m series with CAAM enabled

Hi Fabio Thanks for the patch information. @Rasmus Villemoes I hope this fixed your problem? Regards Gaurav Jain > -Original Message- > From: Fabio Estevam > Sent: Monday, October 10, 2022 7:45 PM > To: Rasmus Villemoes ; Marcel Ziswiler > > Cc: ZHIZHIKIN Andrey ; Gaurav > Jain ; u-boo

<    1   2