Re: [PATCH 2/2] gpio: sunxi: Remove the sunxi_name_to_gpio_bank function

On Sun, 12 Sept 2021 at 09:28, Samuel Holland wrote: > > The only caller of this function was the MMC pinmux code, which used it > to parse a string given from a Kconfig symbol. As the Kconfig symbol has > been converted to a Boolean, this function is no longer needed. > > Signed-off-by: Samuel Ho

Re: [PATCH 3/3] gpio: Factor out DT flag translation

On Sat, 11 Sept 2021 at 16:06, Samuel Holland wrote: > > The generic GPIO flags binding is shared across many drivers, some of > which need their own xlate function. Factor out the flag translation > code from gpio_xlate_offs_flags so it does not need to be duplicated. > > Signed-off-by: Samuel Ho

Re: [PATCH] RFC: Support an EFI-loader bootflow

Hi Takahiro, On Mon, 6 Sept 2021 at 21:58, AKASHI Takahiro wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 06, 2021 at 04:41:55AM -0600, Simon Glass wrote: > > Hi Heinrich, > > > > On Fri, 3 Sept 2021 at 10:30, Heinrich Schuchardt > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > On 9/3/21 10:53 AM, Simon Glass wrote: > > > > Hi Taka

Re: [PATCH] RFC: Support an EFI-loader bootflow

On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 10:08:48PM -0600, Simon Glass wrote: > Hi Takahiro, > > On Mon, 6 Sept 2021 at 21:58, AKASHI Takahiro > wrote: > > > > On Mon, Sep 06, 2021 at 04:41:55AM -0600, Simon Glass wrote: > > > Hi Heinrich, > > > > > > On Fri, 3 Sept 2021 at 10:30, Heinrich Schuchardt > > > wrot

Re: Driver model at UEFI runtime

Hi Heinrich, On Thu, Sep 9, 2021 at 7:16 PM Heinrich Schuchardt wrote: > > Hello Simon, > > The EBBR specification requires that the UEFI SystemReset() runtime > service is available to the operating system. > > Up to now this has been implemented by overriding function > efi_reset_system() which

[PATCH v2] mtd: spi-nor-core: Add fixups for s25fs512s

From: Takahiro Kuwano The current S25FS512S support has following issues that need to be fixed. - Non-uniform sectors by factory default. The setting needs to be checked and assign erase hook as needed. - Page size is wrongly advertised in SFDP. - READ_1_1_2 (3Bh/3Ch), READ_1_1_4 (6Bh/

Re: Driver model at UEFI runtime

Le jeu. 30 sept. 2021 à 07:12, Bin Meng a écrit : > Hi Heinrich, > > On Thu, Sep 9, 2021 at 7:16 PM Heinrich Schuchardt > wrote: > > > > Hello Simon, > > > > The EBBR specification requires that the UEFI SystemReset() runtime > > service is available to the operating system. > > > > Up to now th

Re: Driver model at UEFI runtime

On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 2:23 PM François Ozog wrote: > > > Le jeu. 30 sept. 2021 à 07:12, Bin Meng a écrit : > >> Hi Heinrich, >> >> On Thu, Sep 9, 2021 at 7:16 PM Heinrich Schuchardt >> wrote: >> > >> > Hello Simon, >> > >> > The EBBR specification requires that the UEFI SystemReset() runtime

[PATCH 1/3 v2] riscv: Remove OF_PRIOR_STAGE from RISC-V boards

At some point back in 2018 prior_stage_fdt_address and OF_PRIOR_STAGE got introduced, in order to support a DTB handed over by an earlier stage boo loader. However we have another option in the Kconfig (OF_BOARD) which has identical semantics. On RISC-V some of the platforms pick up the DTB from

[PATCH 2/3 v2] board: arm: Remove OF_PRIOR_STAGE from the remaining Arm boards

At some point back in 2018 prior_stage_fdt_address and OF_PRIOR_STAGE got introduced, in order to support a DTB handed over by an earlier stage boo loader. However we have another option in the Kconfig (OF_BOARD) which has identical semantics. So let's remove the option in an effort to simplify

[PATCH 3/3] treewide: Remove OF_PRIOR_STAGE

The previous patches removed OF_PRIOR_STAGE from the last consumers of the Kconfig option. Cleanup any references to it in documentation, code and configuration options. Signed-off-by: Ilias Apalodimas Reviewed-by: Simon Glass --- Changes since v1: - none dts/Kconfig | 11 ++--

Re: Driver model at UEFI runtime

Le jeu. 30 sept. 2021 à 08:38, Bin Meng a écrit : > On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 2:23 PM François Ozog > wrote: > >> >> >> Le jeu. 30 sept. 2021 à 07:12, Bin Meng a écrit : >> >>> Hi Heinrich, >>> >>> On Thu, Sep 9, 2021 at 7:16 PM Heinrich Schuchardt >>> wrote: >>> > >>> > Hello Simon, >>> > >>> >

Re: Driver model at UEFI runtime

On Thu, 30 Sept 2021 at 09:38, Bin Meng wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 2:23 PM François Ozog > wrote: >> >> >> >> Le jeu. 30 sept. 2021 à 07:12, Bin Meng a écrit : >>> >>> Hi Heinrich, >>> >>> On Thu, Sep 9, 2021 at 7:16 PM Heinrich Schuchardt >>> wrote: >>> > >>> > Hello Simon, >>> > >>>

Re: Driver model at UEFI runtime

On 9/30/21 8:23 AM, François Ozog wrote: Le jeu. 30 sept. 2021 à 07:12, Bin Meng mailto:bmeng...@gmail.com>> a écrit : Hi Heinrich, On Thu, Sep 9, 2021 at 7:16 PM Heinrich Schuchardt mailto:xypron.g...@gmx.de>> wrote: > > Hello Simon, > > The EBBR specificat

<    1   2