Re: [PATCH 2/6] efi_loader: Add device path related functions for initrd via Boot####

2021-03-11 Thread AKASHI Takahiro
On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 06:42:14AM +0200, Ilias Apalodimas wrote: > On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 01:32:50PM +0900, AKASHI Takahiro wrote: > [...] > > > > > > My understanding is that we have: > > > > > > > > > > > > kernel path,end(0xff), > > > > > > VenMedia(), /* no end node here */ > > > > > > initr

Re: [PATCH v2] tee: optee: Change printing during optee_probe

2021-03-11 Thread Ilias Apalodimas
On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 09:45:46PM -0700, Simon Glass wrote: > Hi Ilias, > > On Wed, 10 Mar 2021 at 06:35, Ilias Apalodimas > wrote: > > > > Right now the error messages when optee has a version mismatch or shared > > memory is not configured are done with a debug(). > > That's not very convenien

Re: [PATCH 2/6] efi_loader: Add device path related functions for initrd via Boot####

2021-03-11 Thread Ilias Apalodimas
> > > > > > [...] > > > > > > which will create: > > > > > > kernel path,end(0xff), > > > > > > VenMedia(), end(0x01), > > > > > > initrd1, end(0x01), > > > > > > initrd2, end(0xff) > > > > > > > > > > What is the difference between end(0xff) and end(0x01)? > > > > > > > > > > > > > 0xff

Re: [PATCH 5/6] efidebug: add multiple device path instances on Boot####

2021-03-11 Thread AKASHI Takahiro
On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 06:55:57AM +0200, Ilias Apalodimas wrote: > Akashi-san > > > > > [...] > > > +/** > > > + * add_initrd_instance() - Append a device path to load_options pointing > > > to an > > > + * inirtd > > > + if (!initrd_dp) { > > > + printf("Canno

Re: [PATCH 5/6] efidebug: add multiple device path instances on Boot####

2021-03-11 Thread Ilias Apalodimas
Akashi-san, > On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 02:23:13PM +0900, AKASHI Takahiro wrote: > On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 06:55:57AM +0200, Ilias Apalodimas wrote: > > Akashi-san > > > > > > > > [...] > > > > +/** > > > > + * add_initrd_instance() - Append a device path to load_options > > > > pointing to an >

Re: [PATCH 5/6] efidebug: add multiple device path instances on Boot####

2021-03-11 Thread AKASHI Takahiro
On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 07:37:55AM +0200, Ilias Apalodimas wrote: > Akashi-san, > > On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 02:23:13PM +0900, AKASHI Takahiro wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 06:55:57AM +0200, Ilias Apalodimas wrote: > > > Akashi-san > > > > > > > > > > > [...] > > > > > +/** > > > > > + * add

Re: [PATCH 1/4] net: phy: fixed: be compatible with live OF tree

2021-03-11 Thread Bin Meng
On Wed, Feb 17, 2021 at 6:48 AM Vladimir Oltean wrote: > > From: Vladimir Oltean > > On systems that use CONFIG_OF_LIVE, the "ofnode" type is defined as > const struct device_node *np, while on the flat DT systems it is defined > as a long of_offset into gd->fdt_blob. > > It is desirable that the

Re: [PATCH u-boot 37/39] ARM: don't use -ffunction-sections/-fdata-sections with LTO build

2021-03-11 Thread Marek Behun
On Wed, 10 Mar 2021 11:40:42 +0800 Bin Meng wrote: > On Sun, Mar 7, 2021 at 12:26 PM Marek Behún wrote: > > > > When building with LTO, using -ffunction-sections/-fdata-sections is not > > useful anymore. > > > > Signed-off-by: Marek Behún > > --- > > arch/arm/config.mk | 8 ++-- > > 1 fil

Re: [PATCH u-boot 37/39] ARM: don't use -ffunction-sections/-fdata-sections with LTO build

2021-03-11 Thread Bin Meng
On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 2:45 PM Marek Behun wrote: > > On Wed, 10 Mar 2021 11:40:42 +0800 > Bin Meng wrote: > > > On Sun, Mar 7, 2021 at 12:26 PM Marek Behún wrote: > > > > > > When building with LTO, using -ffunction-sections/-fdata-sections is not > > > useful anymore. > > > > > > Signed-off-b

Re: [PATCH] cmd: part: number: remove inconsistent 0x from returned value

2021-03-11 Thread Stefan Herbrechtsmeier
Hi Simon, Am 12.03.2021 um 05:45 schrieb Simon Glass: Hi Stefan, On Mon, 8 Mar 2021 at 03:45, Stefan Herbrechtsmeier wrote: Hi, Am 06.03.2021 um 21:12 schrieb Tom Rini: On Fri, Mar 05, 2021 at 07:35:24AM -0700, Simon Glass wrote: Hi, On Fri, 5 Mar 2021 at 07:33, Stefan Herbrechtsmeier w

Re: [PATCH u-boot 37/39] ARM: don't use -ffunction-sections/-fdata-sections with LTO build

2021-03-11 Thread Marek Behun
On Fri, 12 Mar 2021 14:48:04 +0800 Bin Meng wrote: > On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 2:45 PM Marek Behun wrote: > > > > On Wed, 10 Mar 2021 11:40:42 +0800 > > Bin Meng wrote: > > > > > On Sun, Mar 7, 2021 at 12:26 PM Marek Behún wrote: > > > > > > > > When building with LTO, using -ffunction-secti

Re: [PATCH u-boot 37/39] ARM: don't use -ffunction-sections/-fdata-sections with LTO build

2021-03-11 Thread Marek Behun
On Fri, 12 Mar 2021 14:48:04 +0800 Bin Meng wrote: > On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 2:45 PM Marek Behun wrote: > > > > On Wed, 10 Mar 2021 11:40:42 +0800 > > Bin Meng wrote: > > > > > On Sun, Mar 7, 2021 at 12:26 PM Marek Behún wrote: > > > > > > > > When building with LTO, using -ffunction-secti

Re: [PATCH 5/6] efidebug: add multiple device path instances on Boot####

2021-03-11 Thread Ilias Apalodimas
Akashi-san, [...] > > > > Then you have to deserialize the existing stored device path in > > > > Boot, > > > > append the initrd and serialize it again (and last time I checked this > > > > is not > > > > as easy as it sounds). > > > > > > If we take the format like: > > > kernel path,en

Re: [PATCH u-boot 37/39] ARM: don't use -ffunction-sections/-fdata-sections with LTO build

2021-03-11 Thread Bin Meng
On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 3:11 PM Marek Behun wrote: > > On Fri, 12 Mar 2021 14:48:04 +0800 > Bin Meng wrote: > > > On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 2:45 PM Marek Behun wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, 10 Mar 2021 11:40:42 +0800 > > > Bin Meng wrote: > > > > > > > On Sun, Mar 7, 2021 at 12:26 PM Marek Behún wr

Re: [PATCH u-boot 37/39] ARM: don't use -ffunction-sections/-fdata-sections with LTO build

2021-03-11 Thread Marek Behun
On Fri, 12 Mar 2021 15:19:26 +0800 Bin Meng wrote: > On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 3:11 PM Marek Behun wrote: > > > > On Fri, 12 Mar 2021 14:48:04 +0800 > > Bin Meng wrote: > > > > > On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 2:45 PM Marek Behun wrote: > > > > > > > > On Wed, 10 Mar 2021 11:40:42 +0800 > > > > Bin

Re: [PATCH] mtd: spi-nor-ids: add dual and quad mode support to mx25l12805d

2021-03-11 Thread Stefan Herbrechtsmeier
Hi Pratyush Yadav, Am 11.03.2021 um 13:15 schrieb Pratyush Yadav: Hi Stefan, On 11/03/21 10:55AM, Stefan Herbrechtsmeier wrote: From: Stefan Herbrechtsmeier The NOR flash MX25L12835F reuse the JEDEC ID of the MX25l12805D but supports dual and quad mode. There is some discussion going on ov

Re: [PATCH 1/4] net: phy: fixed: be compatible with live OF tree

2021-03-11 Thread Bin Meng
On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 2:34 PM Bin Meng wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 17, 2021 at 6:48 AM Vladimir Oltean wrote: > > > > From: Vladimir Oltean > > > > On systems that use CONFIG_OF_LIVE, the "ofnode" type is defined as > > const struct device_node *np, while on the flat DT systems it is defined > > as

<    1   2