Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] test/py: make each unit test a pytest

On 01/28/2016 08:52 PM, Simon Glass wrote: > Hi Stephen, > > On 28 January 2016 at 16:45, Stephen Warren wrote: >> From: Stephen Warren >> >> A custom fixture named ut_subtest is implemented which is parametrized >> with the names of all unit tests that the U-Boot binary supports. This >> causes

Re: [U-Boot] Include patchwork patch ID in commit message?

Hello Joe, Am 28.01.2016 um 16:15 schrieb Joe Hershberger: Hi Heiko, On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 12:39 AM, Heiko Schocher wrote: Hello Tom, Am 28.01.2016 um 00:45 schrieb Tom Rini: On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 05:15:17PM -0600, Joe Hershberger wrote: On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 4:22 PM, Tom Rini wro

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] rpi: fix up Model B entries

On 01/25/2016 01:36 PM, Lubomir Rintel wrote: > It seems like the P5 header was not present on "Model B" any board prior > to Revision 2.0, there's no need for a separate device tree. > > Also, it looks like "rev2" is incorrectly used to only cover the 512MiB > memory models; there also were 256Mi

[U-Boot] [PATCH] rpi: link to another model number info source

This source has been blessed by Dom Cobley at the RPi Foundation, so seems like the best source to refer to. It's a superset of and consistent with the other sources. Cc: Lubomir Rintel Cc: Eric Anholt Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren --- This patch is in reponse to Lubomir Rintel's "rpi: fix up M

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 10/26] Kconfig: Move CONFIG_FIT and CONFIG_OF_*_SETUP to Kconfig

Hello Simon, Am 28.01.2016 um 17:39 schrieb Simon Glass: Move these options to Kconfig and tidy up board configuration: CONFIG_FIT CONFIG_OF_BOARD_SETUP CONFIG_OF_SYSTEM_SETUP Unfortunately the first one is a little complicated. We need to make sure this option is not enabled in SP

Re: [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH] dfu: allow get_medium_size() to return bigger medium sizes than 2GiB

Hello Joe, Am 28.01.2016 um 16:03 schrieb Joe Hershberger: On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 8:24 AM, Heiko Schocher wrote: change the get_medium_size() function from - long (*get_medium_size)(struct dfu_entity *dfu); + int (*get_medium_size)(struct dfu_entity *dfu, u64 *size); so it can re

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 0/2] dfu: samsung: Commits to allow sending and storing large files via DFU

Hello Lukasz, Am 28.01.2016 um 17:46 schrieb Lukasz Majewski: Those commits allow sending and storing large files (e.g. 26 MiB) on the Odroid XU3 board. On purpose they are sent together to shed light on the process of tunning board to be capable of large files transfer. I would be _REALLY_

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] armv7: add cacheline sizes where missing

On Wed, 27 Jan 2016 08:46:11 +0100, Albert ARIBAUD wrote: > Some armv7 targets are missing a cache line size declaration. > In preparation for "arm: cache: Implement cache range check for v7" > patch, add these declarations with the appropriate value for > the target's SoC or CPU. > > Signed-off-

<    1   2   3