Re: [U-Boot] mxs power initialization

2015-06-09 Thread Ruud Commandeur
Hi Stefan, > -Oorspronkelijk bericht- > Van: Stefan Wahren [mailto:stefan.wah...@i2se.com] > Verzonden: zaterdag 6 juni 2015 08:38 > Aan: Ruud Commandeur > Onderwerp: Re: [U-Boot] mxs power initialization > > Hi, > > > Ruud Commandeur hat am 5. Juni 2015 um > 16:38 geschrieben: > > >

Re: [U-Boot] [ANN] U-Boot v2015.07-rc2 released

2015-06-09 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Tom, In message <20150608215347.GZ1728@bill-the-cat> you wrote: > > I've pushed v2015.04-rc2 out to the repository and tarballs should exist > soon. Tarballs are on the FTP server [1] and the ACD [2]. [1] ftp://ftp.denx.de/pub/u-boot/u-boot-2015.07-rc2.tar.bz2 [2] https://www.amazon.com/c

[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/9] dm: cpu: Fix undefined ENOSYS build error

2015-06-09 Thread Bin Meng
Include otherwise ENOSYS is undefined. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng --- common/cmd_cpu.c | 1 + drivers/cpu/cpu-uclass.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/common/cmd_cpu.c b/common/cmd_cpu.c index c3e229f..b4af64f 100644 --- a/common/cmd_cpu.c +++ b/common/cmd_cpu.c @@ -

[U-Boot] [PATCH 2/9] dm: cpu: Test against cpu_ops->get_info in cpu_get_info()

2015-06-09 Thread Bin Meng
In cpu_get_info() it wrongly tests against cpu_ops->get_desc to see if it is NULL. It should test against cpu_ops->get_info. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng --- drivers/cpu/cpu-uclass.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/cpu/cpu-uclass.c b/drivers/cpu/cpu-uclass

[U-Boot] [PATCH 4/9] x86: Move MP initialization codes into a common place

2015-06-09 Thread Bin Meng
Most of the MP initialization codes in arch/x86/cpu/baytrail/cpu.c is common to all x86 processors, except detect_num_cpus() which varies from cpu to cpu. Move these to arch/x86/cpu/cpu.c and declare a weak detect_num_cpus() which just returns 2 which is minimally required. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng

[U-Boot] [PATCH 3/9] x86: dm: Clean up cpu drivers

2015-06-09 Thread Bin Meng
This commit does the following to clean up x86 cpu dm drivers: - Move cpu_x86 driver codes from arch/x86/cpu/cpu.c to a dedicated file arch/x86/cpu/cpu_x86.c - Rename x86_cpu_get_desc() to cpu_x86_get_desc() to keep consistent naming with other dm drivers - Add a new cpu_x86_bind() in the cpu_x

[U-Boot] [PATCH 5/9] x86: kconfig: Make MAX_CPUS and AP_STACK_SIZE depend on SMP

2015-06-09 Thread Bin Meng
MAX_CPUS and AP_STACK_SIZE are only meaningful when SMP is on. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng --- arch/x86/Kconfig | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/arch/x86/Kconfig b/arch/x86/Kconfig index 3506ba2..d4cd9ed 100644 --- a/arch/x86/Kconfig +++ b/arch/x86/Kconfig @@ -228,6 +228,7 @@ c

[U-Boot] [PATCH 9/9] x86: crownbay: Add MP initialization

2015-06-09 Thread Bin Meng
Intel Crown Bay board has a TunnelCreek processor which supports hyper-threading. Add /cpus node in the crownbay.dts and enable the MP initialization. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng --- arch/x86/dts/crownbay.dts | 20 configs/crownbay_defconfig | 4 2 files changed, 24 ins

[U-Boot] [PATCH 6/9] x86: kconfig: Fix minor nits in MAX_CPUS

2015-06-09 Thread Bin Meng
Move MAX_CPUS definition after SMP so that it shows below SMP in the menuconfig. Also replace the leading spaces in the MAX_CPUS section with tabs to conform coding standard. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng --- arch/x86/Kconfig | 24 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 12 deletio

[U-Boot] [PATCH 7/9] x86: Move lapic_setup() call into init_bsp()

2015-06-09 Thread Bin Meng
Currently lapic_setup() is called before calling mp_init(), which then calls init_bsp() where it calls enable_lapic(), which was already enabled in lapic_setup(). Hence move lapic_setup() call into init_bsp() to avoid the duplication. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng --- arch/x86/cpu/cpu.c | 2 -- a

[U-Boot] [PATCH 8/9] x86: Clean up lapic codes

2015-06-09 Thread Bin Meng
This commit cleans up the lapic codes: - Delete arch/x86/include/asm/lapic_def.h, and move register and bit defines into arch/x86/include/asm/lapic.h - Use MSR defines from msr-index.h in enable_lapic() and disable_lapic() - Remove unnecessary stuff like NEED_LAPIC, X86_GOOD_APIC and CONFIG_AP_

[U-Boot] [PATCH] ARM: UniPhier: drop special CONFIG_AUTOBOOT_ settings

2015-06-09 Thread Masahiro Yamada
There is no good reason to use a particular key to stop autobooting. The default allows us to stop the autoboot with any key input. Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada --- configs/ph1_ld4_defconfig | 4 configs/ph1_pro4_defconfig | 4 configs/ph1_sld8_defconfig | 4 3 files changed,

[U-Boot] [PATCH] arm: ls102xa: Add little-endian mode support for audio IPs

2015-06-09 Thread Alison Wang
As SCFG_ENDIANCR register is added to choose little-endian or big-endian for audio IPs on Rev2.0 silion, little-endian mode is selected. Signed-off-by: Alison Wang --- arch/arm/include/asm/arch-ls102xa/immap_ls102xa.h | 3 ++- board/freescale/ls1021aqds/ls1021aqds.c | 3 +++ board/free

[U-Boot] [PATCH RFT] gpio: vybrid: Fix up setting output value in vybrid_gpio_direction_output

2015-06-09 Thread Axel Lin
Pass correct gpio argument to gpio_set_value(). The calcualation of gpio = gpio + (gpios->chip * VYBRID_GPIO_COUNT); is required for calling imx_iomux_gpio_* functions so move them close to improve readability. Signed-off-by: Axel Lin --- Hi Bhuvanchandra, I think current code does not pass corre

Re: [U-Boot] patch - arm - define SYS_CACHELINE_SIZE for mx5

2015-06-09 Thread Stefano Babic
Hi Fabio, Chris, On 09/06/2015 00:00, Fabio Estevam wrote: > Adding the i.MX maintaner, Stefano Babic. > Thanks - it was missed in my last Pr. Applied to u-boot-imx, thanks ! Best regards, Stefano Babic > Regards, > > Fabio Estevam > > On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 6:55 PM, Chris Kuethe wrote: >>

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2] tbs2910: add thermal support

2015-06-09 Thread Stefano Babic
On 29/05/2015 20:32, Soeren Moch wrote: > Signed-off-by: Soeren Moch > --- > Cc: Stefano Babic > --- > configs/tbs2910_defconfig | 2 ++ > include/configs/tbs2910.h | 2 ++ > 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/configs/tbs2910_defconfig b/configs/tbs2910_defconfig > index cace345.

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/2] tbs2910: add PRE_CONSOLE_BUFFER support

2015-06-09 Thread Stefano Babic
On 29/05/2015 20:32, Soeren Moch wrote: > Add PRE_CONSOLE_BUFFER support to display early boot messages over HDMI. > > Signed-off-by: Soeren Moch > --- > Cc: Stefano Babic > --- > include/configs/tbs2910.h | 4 > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/include/configs/tbs2910.h b

[U-Boot] Disabling Autonegotiation

2015-06-09 Thread priyanka sharma
Hi , I am trying to disable auto negotiation in U-boot. I modified drivers/net/phy/phy.c setting dev->autoneg = AUTONEG_DISABLE;. Autonegotion is disabled but u-boot however waits for autonegotiation to complete in the function "genphy_update_link( )" Modifying the values of BMCR_ANENA

Re: [U-Boot] Disabling Autonegotiation

2015-06-09 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear priyanka sharma, In message you wrote: > > I am trying to disable auto negotiation in U-boot. May I ask why exactly you want to do this? It is almost always a very bad idea to disable autonegotiation. Usually there are other ways to solve the problem, but we cannot help you because you d

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCHv4 1/3] driver/ddr/altera: Add DDR driver for Altera's SDRAM controller

2015-06-09 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! > +struct sdram_prot_rule { > + uint64_tsdram_start; /* SDRAM start address */ > + uint64_tsdram_end; /* SDRAM end address */ > + uint32_trule; /* SDRAM protection rule number: 0-19 */ > + int valid; /* Rule valid or not? 1 - valid, 0 not*/

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCHv4 2/3] driver/ddr/altera: Add the sdram calibration portion

2015-06-09 Thread Pavel Machek
In title, you can convert sdram->SDRAM On Tue 2015-06-02 22:52:49, dingu...@opensource.altera.com wrote: > From: Dinh Nguyen > > This patch adds the DDR calibration portion of the Altera SDRAM driver. > > Signed-off-by: Dinh Nguyen > +/* > + * In order to reduce ROM size, most of the selectab

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCHv4 3/3] arm: socfpga: enable the Altera SDRAM controller driver

2015-06-09 Thread Pavel Machek
On Tue 2015-06-02 22:52:50, dingu...@opensource.altera.com wrote: > From: Dinh Nguyen > > Enable the Altera SDRAM driver for the SoCFPGA platform. > > Signed-off-by: Dinh Nguyen > Acked-by: Marek Vasut Acked-by: Pavel Machek -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pict

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH RFT] gpio: vybrid: Fix up setting output value in vybrid_gpio_direction_output

2015-06-09 Thread Bhuvanchandra DV
Hello Axel, On 06/09/2015 02:45 PM, Axel Lin wrote: Pass correct gpio argument to gpio_set_value(). The calcualation of gpio = gpio + (gpios->chip * VYBRID_GPIO_COUNT); is required for calling imx_iomux_gpio_* functions so move them close to improve readability. Signed-off-by: Axel Lin --- Hi

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCHv4 1/3] driver/ddr/altera: Add DDR driver for Altera's SDRAM controller

2015-06-09 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Pavel, In message <20150609115532.GA29408@amd> you wrote: > > U-Boot is normally spelled "U-Boot". You have two different variants > in comments here. Thanks for pointing out. This is actually quite important as "U-Boot" is _not_ a copyrighted name, while some other spellings are (search f

Re: [U-Boot] Disabling Autonegotiation

2015-06-09 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear priyanka sharma, please keep the mailinmg list on Cc: In message you wrote: > > Disabling auto negotiation along with limiting ethernet PHY to 100MBit is > a part of requirements for a custom solution. This does not actually answer my question. What I'm interested to understand is _why_

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 1/3] ARM: cache: add an empty stub function for invalidate/flush dcache

2015-06-09 Thread Tom Rini
On Tue, Jun 09, 2015 at 11:54:14AM +0800, Josh Wu wrote: > Hi, Tom > > On 6/8/2015 9:20 PM, Tom Rini wrote: > >On Mon, Jun 08, 2015 at 10:26:29AM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote: > >>On Monday, June 08, 2015 at 04:05:04 AM, Josh Wu wrote: > >>>Hi, Marek > >>> > >>>On 6/5/2015 9:18 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH RFT] gpio: vybrid: Fix up setting output value in vybrid_gpio_direction_output

2015-06-09 Thread Axel Lin
2015-06-09 20:58 GMT+08:00 Bhuvanchandra DV : > Hello Axel, > > On 06/09/2015 02:45 PM, Axel Lin wrote: >> >> Pass correct gpio argument to gpio_set_value(). >> The calcualation of gpio = gpio + (gpios->chip * VYBRID_GPIO_COUNT); >> is required for calling imx_iomux_gpio_* functions so move them cl

[U-Boot] [PATCH] thermal:imx_thermal: enter busywait cooling loop when over max CPU temp

2015-06-09 Thread Tim Harvey
Remove the check for temperature being within the min/max range and enter the busywait cooling loop whenever the CPU temperature is over the critical temp. This fixes the issue where if a board was booted at a temp greater than the CPU temperature max, it would skip the loop and never indicate or t

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH RFT] gpio: vybrid: Fix up setting output value in vybrid_gpio_direction_output

2015-06-09 Thread Bhuvanchandra DV
On 06/09/2015 06:49 PM, Axel Lin wrote: 2015-06-09 20:58 GMT+08:00 Bhuvanchandra DV : Hello Axel, On 06/09/2015 02:45 PM, Axel Lin wrote: Pass correct gpio argument to gpio_set_value(). The calcualation of gpio = gpio + (gpios->chip * VYBRID_GPIO_COUNT); is required for calling imx_iomux_gpio

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH RFT] gpio: vybrid: Fix up setting output value in vybrid_gpio_direction_output

2015-06-09 Thread Axel Lin
2015-06-09 21:53 GMT+08:00 Bhuvanchandra DV : > On 06/09/2015 06:49 PM, Axel Lin wrote: >> >> 2015-06-09 20:58 GMT+08:00 Bhuvanchandra DV >> : >>> >>> Hello Axel, >>> >>> On 06/09/2015 02:45 PM, Axel Lin wrote: Pass correct gpio argument to gpio_set_value(). The calcualation of

[U-Boot] [PATCH] gpio: vybrid: Use proper parameter name for gpio offset

2015-06-09 Thread Axel Lin
It's confusing to use gpio as gpio offset parameter so rename it to offset for better readability. Signed-off-by: Axel Lin --- drivers/gpio/vybrid_gpio.c | 24 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpio/vybrid_gpio.c b/drivers/gpio/vybri

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] gpio: vybrid: Use proper parameter name for gpio offset

2015-06-09 Thread Bhuvanchandra DV
On 06/09/2015 07:54 PM, Axel Lin wrote: It's confusing to use gpio as gpio offset parameter so rename it to offset for better readability. Agreed, but IMHO these offsets any way at the end are the gpio numbers of individual gpio chip instances. e.g: gpio 2 of gpio chip 1 which is gpio 34. S

[U-Boot] arm: imx: Kernel not booting when environment is in QSPI

2015-06-09 Thread Matthias Weißer
Hi I work with an imx6sx sdb. I observed that placing u-boot in QSPI flash and also having the environment in QSPI the linux kernel doesn't boot. The backtrace from the kernel contains 'fsl_qspi_probe'. If only u-boot resides in QSPI and the environment is on mmc then the kernel boots successfully

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 1/8] omap-common: Common boot code OMAP3 support and cleanup

2015-06-09 Thread Pali Rohár
On Monday 08 June 2015 23:24:19 Paul Kocialkowski wrote: > diff --git a/board/nokia/rx51/lowlevel_init.S > b/board/nokia/rx51/lowlevel_init.S > index 9d4ea1b..9048f31 100644 > --- a/board/nokia/rx51/lowlevel_init.S > +++ b/board/nokia/rx51/lowlevel_init.S > @@ -28,18 +28,6 @@ imagesize: /*

Re: [U-Boot] arm: imx: Kernel not booting when environment is in QSPI

2015-06-09 Thread Fabio Estevam
Adding some FSL folks in case they have some suggestions. Regards, Fabio Estevam On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 11:41 AM, Matthias Weißer wrote: > Hi > > I work with an imx6sx sdb. I observed that placing u-boot in QSPI > flash and also having the environment in QSPI the linux kernel doesn't > boot. Th

[U-Boot] U-Boot: Nokia N900 (RX-51) is broken again

2015-06-09 Thread Pali Rohár
Hello, commit e11c6c279d823dc0d2f470c5c2e3c0a9854a640f Author: Simon Glass Date: Sat Feb 7 10:47:28 2015 -0700 arm: Allow lr to be saved by board code The link register value can be required on some boards (e.g. FEL mode on sunxi) so use a branch instruction to jump to save_bo

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 0/8] omap-common: Common boot code OMAP3 support and SYS_BOOT-based fallback boot device

2015-06-09 Thread Pali Rohár
On Monday 08 June 2015 23:24:18 Paul Kocialkowski wrote: > I would be very glad to see board maintainers give a go > at the changeset before it gets merged, especially on devices like > the Nokia RX-51 (N900) where some specific adaptation was needed. So U-Boot is broken since e11c6c279d823dc0d2f4

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCHv4 1/3] driver/ddr/altera: Add DDR driver for Altera's SDRAM controller

2015-06-09 Thread Dinh Nguyen
On 6/9/15 6:55 AM, Pavel Machek wrote: > Hi! > >> +struct sdram_prot_rule { >> +uint64_tsdram_start; /* SDRAM start address */ >> +uint64_tsdram_end; /* SDRAM end address */ >> +uint32_trule; /* SDRAM protection rule number: 0-19 */ >> +int val

Re: [U-Boot] arm: imx: Kernel not booting when environment is in QSPI

2015-06-09 Thread Nitin Garg
On 06/09/2015 10:02 AM, Fabio Estevam wrote: > Adding some FSL folks in case they have some suggestions. > > Regards, > > Fabio Estevam > > On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 11:41 AM, Matthias Weißer > wrote: >> Hi >> >> I work with an imx6sx sdb. I observed that placing u-boot in QSPI >> flash and also

[U-Boot] [PATCH] Nokia RX-51: Fix calculating return address in save_boot_params

2015-06-09 Thread Pali Rohár
Commit e11c6c279d823dc0d2f470c5c2e3c0a9854a640f broke calculating lr register in function save_boot_params() and caused U-Boot to crash at early boot time on Nokia N900 board. This patch fix calculating return address in lr register and make Nokia N900 board bootable again. Patch was tested in qem

[U-Boot] Pull request: u-boot-tegra/master

2015-06-09 Thread Tom Warren
Tom, Please pull u-boot-tegra/master into U-Boot/master. Thanks! ./MAKEALL -s tegra is OK, nyan-big verified by Simon. The following changes since commit 3d0158ae18bef2ac89979f4c90419d3add436c71: Prepare v2015.07-rc2 (2015-06-08 17:48:33 -0400) are available in the git repository at: git:

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] Nokia RX-51: Fix calculating return address in save_boot_params

2015-06-09 Thread Simon Glass
On 9 June 2015 at 10:05, Pali Rohár wrote: > Commit e11c6c279d823dc0d2f470c5c2e3c0a9854a640f broke calculating lr register > in function save_boot_params() and caused U-Boot to crash at early boot time > on Nokia N900 board. > > This patch fix calculating return address in lr register and make Nok

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] Nokia RX-51: Fix calculating return address in save_boot_params

2015-06-09 Thread Pali Rohár
On Tuesday 09 June 2015 20:11:22 Simon Glass wrote: > On 9 June 2015 at 10:05, Pali Rohár wrote: > > Commit e11c6c279d823dc0d2f470c5c2e3c0a9854a640f broke calculating > > lr register in function save_boot_params() and caused U-Boot to > > crash at early boot time on Nokia N900 board. > > > > This

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 0/8] omap-common: Common boot code OMAP3 support and SYS_BOOT-based fallback boot device

2015-06-09 Thread Pali Rohár
On Tuesday 09 June 2015 18:28:29 Pali Rohár wrote: > On Monday 08 June 2015 23:24:18 Paul Kocialkowski wrote: > > I would be very glad to see board maintainers give a go > > at the changeset before it gets merged, especially on devices like > > the Nokia RX-51 (N900) where some specific adaptation

Re: [U-Boot] Disabling Autonegotiation

2015-06-09 Thread Christian Gmeiner
Hi all 2015-06-09 15:04 GMT+02:00 Wolfgang Denk : > Dear priyanka sharma, > > please keep the mailinmg list on Cc: > > In message > you > wrote: >> >> Disabling auto negotiation along with limiting ethernet PHY to 100MBit is >> a part of requirements for a custom solution. > > This does not ac

Re: [U-Boot] Disabling Autonegotiation

2015-06-09 Thread Christian Gmeiner
Hi all 2015-06-09 21:50 GMT+02:00 Christian Gmeiner : > Hi all > > 2015-06-09 15:04 GMT+02:00 Wolfgang Denk : >> Dear priyanka sharma, >> >> please keep the mailinmg list on Cc: >> >> In message >> you >> wrote: >>> >>> Disabling auto negotiation along with limiting ethernet PHY to 100MBit is

[U-Boot] What is the expected meaning of CONFIG_SYS_NO_FLASH

2015-06-09 Thread Chris Packham
Hi, There is a bit of confusion at $dayjob about when CONFIG_SYS_NO_FLASH is used. Initially we thought that this meant I have no parallel NOR flash. So a board with only SPI flash would have CONFIG_SYS_NO_FLASH=1 and CONFIG_SPI_FLASH=1. Is this understanding correct? I'd like to be able to add a

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] gpio: vybrid: Use proper parameter name for gpio offset

2015-06-09 Thread Axel Lin
2015-06-09 22:37 GMT+08:00 Bhuvanchandra DV : > On 06/09/2015 07:54 PM, Axel Lin wrote: >> >> It's confusing to use gpio as gpio offset parameter so rename it to offset >> for better readability. > > Agreed, but IMHO these offsets any way at the end are the gpio numbers of > individual gpio chip in

[U-Boot] [PATCH 0/3] spi: cadence_qspi: sram depth from DT & fix for FIFO width

2015-06-09 Thread Vikas Manocha
This patchset adds support to get controller sram size from device tree & fix to support different FIFO widths. Vikas Manocha (3): spi: cadence_qspi: move the sram partition in init spi: cadence_qspi: get sram size from device tree spi: cadence_qspi: support FIFO width other than 4 bytes a

[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/3] spi: cadence_qspi: move the sram partition in init

2015-06-09 Thread Vikas Manocha
There is no need to re-configure sram partition for every read/write for better full use of sram for read or write. This patch divides the half sram for read & half for write once at initialization. Signed-off-by: Vikas Manocha --- drivers/spi/cadence_qspi_apb.c | 16 +--- 1 file c

[U-Boot] [PATCH 2/3] spi: cadence_qspi: get sram size from device tree

2015-06-09 Thread Vikas Manocha
sram size could be different on different socs, e.g. on stv0991 it is 256 while on altera platform it is 128. It is better to receive it from device tree. Signed-off-by: Vikas Manocha --- arch/arm/dts/socfpga.dtsi |1 + arch/arm/dts/stv0991.dts |1 + drivers/spi/cadence_qspi.c

[U-Boot] [PATCH 3/3] spi: cadence_qspi: support FIFO width other than 4 bytes

2015-06-09 Thread Vikas Manocha
This patch makes the code compatible with FIFO depths other than 4 bytes. It also simplify read/write FIFO loops. Signed-off-by: Vikas Manocha --- drivers/spi/cadence_qspi_apb.c | 47 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-) diff --git a/drive

Re: [U-Boot] arm: imx: Kernel not booting when environment is in QSPI

2015-06-09 Thread Peng Fan
Hi Matthias, I can not reproduce your issue. All is fine in my side. which version/branch are you using for uboot and linux? mainline or fsl vendor? Regards, Peng. On Tue, Jun 09, 2015 at 10:24:38AM -0500, Nitin Garg wrote: >On 06/09/2015 10:02 AM, Fabio Estevam wrote: >> Adding some FSL folks

[U-Boot] Kconfiglib updates

2015-06-09 Thread Ulf Magnusson
Hello, I've done lots of internal cleanup and optimization and fixed a few small bugs/incompatibilities in https://github.com/ulfalizer/Kconfiglib: - Unset user values when loading a zero-byte .config. (5e54e2c) - Ignore indented .config assignments. (f8a7510) - Do not require $srctree to be s

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 0/8] omap-common: Common boot code OMAP3 support and SYS_BOOT-based fallback boot device

2015-06-09 Thread Marek Vasut
On Tuesday, June 09, 2015 at 06:28:29 PM, Pali Rohár wrote: > On Monday 08 June 2015 23:24:18 Paul Kocialkowski wrote: > > I would be very glad to see board maintainers give a go > > at the changeset before it gets merged, especially on devices like > > the Nokia RX-51 (N900) where some specific ad

[U-Boot] Compilation of env error u-boot 2015.07-rc2

2015-06-09 Thread Thirumalesha N
Hi all, I have pulled latest code from u-boot main line through git. Using linaro tool chain for am335x board I'm trying to compile tools/env but its giving an error #make ARCH=arm CROSS_COMPILE=arm-linux-gnueabihf- env HOSTCC tools/env/fw_env.o arm-linux-gnueabihf/include/search.h:173:1 erro

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] odroid: dts: cleanup of MAX77686 regulators

2015-06-09 Thread Minkyu Kang
On 19/05/15 00:56, Przemyslaw Marczak wrote: > This commit cleanup MAX77686 regulator node by: > - remove the sub-nodes of unconnected regulators > - remove the "regulator-compatible" properties of all regulators > > This prevents printing init errors for the regulators, > with duplicated name str

Re: [U-Boot] arm: imx: Kernel not booting when environment is in QSPI

2015-06-09 Thread Matthias Weißer
Hi Peng I use mainline (current HEAD, u-boot 2015.07-rc2, linux 4.1.0-rc7) on both sides. Regards Matthias 2015-06-10 3:45 GMT+02:00 Peng Fan : > Hi Matthias, > > I can not reproduce your issue. All is fine in my side. > > which version/branch are you using for uboot and linux? mainline or fsl

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 0/8] omap-common: Common boot code OMAP3 support and SYS_BOOT-based fallback boot device

2015-06-09 Thread Pali Rohár
On Wednesday 10 June 2015 06:27:37 Marek Vasut wrote: > On Tuesday, June 09, 2015 at 06:28:29 PM, Pali Rohár wrote: > > On Monday 08 June 2015 23:24:18 Paul Kocialkowski wrote: > > > I would be very glad to see board maintainers give a go > > > at the changeset before it gets merged, especially on

Re: [U-Boot] arm: imx: Kernel not booting when environment is in QSPI

2015-06-09 Thread Matthias Weißer
Hi Peng With some wild guessing I found out that it must be an interrupt issue. If I clear FR (offset 0x160) in the QSPI module using u-boot command Linux boots successfully. So it seams that u-boot should clear the interrupt flag of the QSPI module after it was used. Commands used to clear the f

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 0/8] omap-common: Common boot code OMAP3 support and SYS_BOOT-based fallback boot device

2015-06-09 Thread Pavel Machek
On Wed 2015-06-10 06:27:37, Marek Vasut wrote: > On Tuesday, June 09, 2015 at 06:28:29 PM, Pali Rohár wrote: > > On Monday 08 June 2015 23:24:18 Paul Kocialkowski wrote: > > > I would be very glad to see board maintainers give a go > > > at the changeset before it gets merged, especially on devices

Re: [U-Boot] arm: imx: Kernel not booting when environment is in QSPI

2015-06-09 Thread Stefan Roese
Hi Matthias, On 10.06.2015 08:19, Matthias Weißer wrote: With some wild guessing I found out that it must be an interrupt issue. If I clear FR (offset 0x160) in the QSPI module using u-boot command Linux boots successfully. So it seams that u-boot should clear the interrupt flag of the QSPI modu