Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] drivers/i2c/fsl_i2c: modify i2c_read to handle multi-byte write

Heiko Schocher denx.de> writes: > > Hmm? Is this v2 of the following patch?: > > [U-Boot] 2c: modify i2c_read API to handle multi-bytes writes > http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/336911/ > > If so, please stick to the follow rules, for sending updated > patches: > > http://www.denx.de/wiki/v

Re: [U-Boot] [GIT PULL] u-boot-mips/master

Hi Tom, On Sun, 20 Apr 2014 13:28:53 +0200 Daniel Schwierzeck wrote: > The following changes since commit b149c4c399b111cec1ff7505ca9fabbeeb4fe394: > > ARM:tegra20: Remove aes debug prints (2014-04-18 16:14:17 -0400) > > are available in the git repository at: > > git://git.denx.de/u-boo

Re: [U-Boot] [GIT PULL] u-boot-mips/master

2014-04-21 10:37 GMT+02:00 Masahiro Yamada : >> diff --git a/doc/README.scrapyard b/doc/README.scrapyard >> index 7d67033..32c85ad 100644 >> --- a/doc/README.scrapyard >> +++ b/doc/README.scrapyard >> @@ -114,3 +114,4 @@ PCIPPC2 powerpc MPC740/MPC750 7c9e89b >> 2013-02-07 Wolfg

Re: [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH 3/5] MAINTAINERS.boards: add initial version

2014-04-21 6:03 GMT+02:00 Masahiro Yamada : > > Weird. > > - board/xilinx/zynq_microzed/ > - board/xilinx/zynq_zc70x/ > - board/xilinx/zynq_zc770/ > - board/xilinx/zynq_zed/ > > do not exist. > > The board directory for Zynq series is board/xilinx/zynq/ > > I guess there's got to be something w

[U-Boot] [PATCH] sandbox: move source files from board/ to arch/sandbox/

Prior to commit 33a02da0, all boards must have board/${BOARD}/ or board/${VENDOR}/${BOARD}/ directory. Now this rule is obsolete. It looks weird that sandbox defines "vendor" and "board" just for meeting the old U-Boot directory structure. Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada Cc: Simon Glass --- Simo

Re: [U-Boot] [GIT PULL] u-boot-mips/master

Hi Daniel, > > Tom, a conflict will happen anyway when pulling u-boot-mips/master. > > why? The branch is rebased to current master so it would be a > fast-forward merge. Sorry, my misunderstanding. I was seeing your patch file: http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2014-April/177675.html You

[U-Boot] [PATCH] sandbox: ignore sandbox.dtb

Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada Cc: Simon Glass --- arch/sandbox/dts/.gitignore | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) create mode 100644 arch/sandbox/dts/.gitignore diff --git a/arch/sandbox/dts/.gitignore b/arch/sandbox/dts/.gitignore new file mode 100644 index 000..b60ed20 --- /dev/null +

Re: [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH 3/5] MAINTAINERS.boards: add initial version

Hi Daniel, > > ok. I can think of two options: > - keep the alphabetical order and use "S: Orphan (since September, 2013)" > - move the orphan boards to the bottom and add those separator comments > > Which one do you prefer? I prefer - keep the alphabetical order and use "S: Orphan (since Se

[U-Boot] [PATCH v9 0/2] S5P: Exynos: Add GPIO numbering feature

Used a script to recheck/verify pin mapping and existing mapping appears to be fine, returning correct bank and pin values. Did ./MAKEALL -a arm and found all Exynos/S5P related boards compiled successfully. Couldn't test booting over all of them. Tested U-Boot bootup over SMDK5420, SMDK5250, Snow.

[U-Boot] [PATCH v9 2/2] S5P: Exynos: Config: Enable Generic GPIO and CMD configs

Enabling configs for GPIO CMD and Generic GPIO in case of S5P and Exynos target boards. Also, doing modifications in the config definitions wherever required due to change in gpio macros pin numbering enums. Signed-off-by: Rajeshwari Shinde Signed-off-by: Akshay Saraswat --- include/configs/arn

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] Revert "build: Use filechk rules to create and update u-boot.lds"

On 04/20/2014 09:33 PM, Masahiro Yamada wrote: This reverts commit a8b993eb81c142a439c24b871a2317f765fe5397. Commit a8b993eb claims it fixes u-boot.lds rule by replacing $(call if_changed) with $(call filechk). But the problem had already been fixed by commit 395e60cd a few days before commit a

Re: [U-Boot] config: enable CONFIG_API in distro config

On Sun, 20 Apr 2014 09:55:53 -0700 Simon Glass wrote: > Hi Dennis, > > On 19 April 2014 08:42, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > On Sat, 19 Apr 2014 15:01:40 +0100 > > Ian Campbell wrote: > > > > > On Fri, 2014-04-18 at 11:43 -0600, Simon Gl

[U-Boot] patchwork down again?

Does anyone have a problem accessing patchwork? York ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot

Re: [U-Boot] Please pull u-boot-ti/master

>-Original Message- >From: u-boot-boun...@lists.denx.de [mailto:u-boot-boun...@lists.denx.de] On >Behalf Of >Rini, Tom >Sent: Friday, April 18, 2014 9:25 AM >To: Albert Aribaud; u-boot@lists.denx.de >Subject: [U-Boot] Please pull u-boot-ti/master > >Hey, > >The following changes since comm

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 0/14] Split out code from the enormous main.c

Hi, On 10 April 2014 20:01, Simon Glass wrote: > A previous series created a way of using if () instead of #ifdef for > controlling feature inclusion in U-Boot. The primary target of that series > was common/main.c which is full of #ifdefs. That work was put on hold while > the kbuild work was in

Re: [U-Boot] config: enable CONFIG_API in distro config

Hi Dennis, On 21 April 2014 08:49, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > On Sun, 20 Apr 2014 09:55:53 -0700 > Simon Glass wrote: > > [snip] > Can you suggest a starting point for trying this out on am ARM > > platform? (e.g. OMAP, Tegra, Exynos) I'd like to see how it works. > > as of 2014.04 it will work o

Re: [U-Boot] config: enable CONFIG_API in distro config

On 04/21/2014 11:57 AM, Simon Glass wrote: > Hi Dennis, > > On 21 April 2014 08:49, Dennis Gilmore > wrote: > > On Sun, 20 Apr 2014 09:55:53 -0700 > Simon Glass mailto:s...@chromium.org>> wrote: > > [snip] > > > Can you suggest a starting point for trying th

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 06/11] MX6: add struct for sharing data between SPL and uboot

On Sun, Apr 20, 2014 at 12:52 AM, Igor Grinberg wrote: > On 04/18/14 09:35, Tim Harvey wrote: >> On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 4:44 AM, Stefano Babic wrote: >>> Hi Igor, hi Tim >>> >>> On 17/04/2014 13:22, Igor Grinberg wrote: >>> get_ram_size() works on cm-fx6 all DRAM configurations. >>> >>

Re: [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH 3/5] MAINTAINERS.boards: add initial version

Dear Wolfgang, 2014-04-20 23:26 GMT+02:00 Wolfgang Denk : > Dear Daniel Schwierzeck, > > In message <1398027454-20399-4-git-send-email-daniel.schwierz...@gmail.com> > you wrote: >> MAINTAINERS.boards is generated from boards.cfg at >> commit b149c4c. >> >> Signed-off-by: Daniel Schwierzeck > > I

Re: [U-Boot] pull request for u-boot-tegra/master into ARM/master

Hi Tom, On Thu, 17 Apr 2014 09:08:50 -0700, Tom Warren wrote: > Albert, > > Please pull u-boot-tegra/master into ARM/master. Thanks! > > ./MAKEALL -s tegra AOK, checkpatch.pl is OK, and ./MAKEALL -a arm only > shows failures that were already present in ARM/master. > > The following changes s

Re: [U-Boot] Please pull u-boot-ti/master

Hi Tom, On Fri, 18 Apr 2014 09:24:36 -0400, Tom Rini wrote: > Hey, > > The following changes since commit 1b82491ee6ee1e986e5521b33692a00e1f38fe75: > > board:tricorder: fixup SPL OOB layout (2014-04-11 10:08:42 -0400) > > are available in the git repository at: > > git://git.denx.de/u-bo

[U-Boot] [PATCH] ARM: tegra: fix CPU VDD comment in Tegra30 CPU init code

From: Stephen Warren The register writes performed by arch/arm/cpu/arm720t/tegra30/cpu.c enable_cpu_power_rail() set the voltage to 1.0V not 1.4V as the comment implies. Fix the comment. Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren --- arch/arm/cpu/arm720t/tegra30/cpu.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] sandbox: move source files from board/ to arch/sandbox/

Hi Masahiro, On 21 April 2014 03:39, Masahiro Yamada wrote: > Prior to commit 33a02da0, all boards must have board/${BOARD}/ > or board/${VENDOR}/${BOARD}/ directory. > Now this rule is obsolete. > > It looks weird that sandbox defines "vendor" and "board" just for > meeting the old U-Boot direct

Re: [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH 3/5] MAINTAINERS.boards: add initial version

Dear Daniel, In message you wrote: > > > I understand your intentions, but I have to admit that I seriously > > dislike this approach. It has been quite a long way to come up with > > boards.cfg, which would attempt to colect all relevant information for > > a board in a single database. In m

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v4 0/5] Android Fastboot support

On Friday, April 18, 2014 at 06:14:26 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Dear Rob, > > In message <1397829272-22266-1-git-send-email-robherri...@gmail.com> you wrote: > > I dropped the patch adding a loadsize env variable and added config > > uptions instead to set the fastboot buffer size. > > Thanks,

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 1/2] usb:gadget:f_thor: code cleanup in function download_tail()

On Friday, April 18, 2014 at 09:48:24 AM, Przemyslaw Marczak wrote: > In thor's download_tail() function, dfu_get_entity() is called > before each dfu_write() call and the returned entity pointers > are the same. So dfu_get_entity() can be called just once and > this patch changes this. > > Signed

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 2/2] usb:gadget:f_thor: fix write to filesystem by add dfu_flush()

On Friday, April 18, 2014 at 09:48:25 AM, Przemyslaw Marczak wrote: > Since dfu read/write operations needs to be flushed manually, > writing to filesystem on MMC by thor was broken. MMC raw write > actually is working fine because current dfu_flush() function > writes filesystem only. This commit

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] sandbox: ignore sandbox.dtb

On 21 April 2014 03:50, Masahiro Yamada wrote: > Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada > Cc: Simon Glass > Thanks. Acked-by: Simon Glass ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2] mtd: denali: improve nand_read_oob and fix nand_write_oob

On Fri, 2014-04-18 at 20:30 +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote: > [2] Make denali_read_oob() 10x faster. > > One of the fatal issues of v7 is "nand bad" command is extremely slow. > > This is the benchmark of v7 > > => time nand bad > > Device 0 bad blocks: > > time: 11.300 seconds, 11300 tic

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] config: enable CMD_BMP when API+LCD is enabled

Hi Stephen, On 18 April 2014 11:15, Stephen Warren wrote: > > From: Stephen Warren > > When both CONFIG_API and CONFIG_LCD are enabled, the API code calls > lcd_display_bitmap(). That isn't compiled unless either CONFIG_CMD_BMP > or CONFIG_SPLASH_SCREEN is enabled. In order to prevent build prob

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] sandbox: move source files from board/ to arch/sandbox/

Hi Simon, On Mon, 21 Apr 2014 15:02:20 -0600 Simon Glass wrote: > Hi Masahiro, > > On 21 April 2014 03:39, Masahiro Yamada wrote: > > Prior to commit 33a02da0, all boards must have board/${BOARD}/ > > or board/${VENDOR}/${BOARD}/ directory. > > Now this rule is obsolete. > > > > It looks weir

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2] mtd: denali: improve nand_read_oob and fix nand_write_oob

Hi Scott, > > It is really really painful to wait more than 10 seconds just for bad block > > scanning to boot Linux. > > Making bad block scans faster is a good thing, but why do you need to > scan them just to boot Linux? Aren't you using an on-flash BBT? I did not know that. I thought all b

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] Revert "build: Use filechk rules to create and update u-boot.lds"

Hi Jon, > > What is worse is > > $(call filechk) is too strong to fix the problem and looks weird. > > I'm sure I don't understand that critique at all. "Looks weird"? The linker script is processed by C-preprocessor. It means the dependency of included files should be tracked to decide if

[U-Boot] Some PowerPC boards are broken

Hi. I found 6 PowerPC boards are broken: MPC8572DS MPC8572DS_36BIT dlvision-10g io iocon neo Section overlap error occurrs. powerpc-linux-ld.bfd: section .resetvec loaded at [fffc,] overlaps section .u_boot_list loaded at [faec,000102ef] powerp

Re: [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH 3/5] MAINTAINERS.boards: add initial version

Hi Wolfgang, On Mon, 21 Apr 2014 23:16:48 +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Dear Daniel, > > In message > you > wrote: > > > > > I understand your intentions, but I have to admit that I seriously > > > dislike this approach. It has been quite a long way to come up with > > > boards.cfg, which

[U-Boot] [PATCH][v2] powerpc/T4QDS: add two stage boot of nand/sd

From: Shaohui Xie Add support of 2 stage NAND/SD boot loader using SPL framework. PBL initialise the internal SRAM and copy SPL, this further initialise DDR using SPD and environment and copy u-boot from NAND/SD to DDR, finally SPL transfer control to u-boot. NOR uses CS1 instead of CS2 when NAND