[U-Boot] Moschip ethernet adapter is not seen as ethernet device

2012-11-18 Thread valdez valdez
Hello, I tried use my USB ETH adapter. Following README files I addes into beagle.h file (my board is beagleboard) this: #define CONFIG_USB_HOST_ETHER/* Enable USB Ethernet adapters */ #define CONFIG_USB_ETHER_ASIX/* Asix, or whatever driver(s) you want */ #define CONFIG_CMD_NET #define

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] OMAP3 SPI : Fixed bugs related to SPI transfer

2012-11-18 Thread Peter Korsgaard
> "Ajoy" == Ajoy Kumar Das writes: Ajoy> From: ajoy Ajoy> Added posted writes (read after writes) to effect the Ajoy> change immediately for channel confiuration and channel Ajoy> enable register Ajoy> Disable the channel to purge receieve data in TX_ONLY Ajoy> mode transfer otherwise

Re: [U-Boot] usb: ehci: Take advantage of the new multi-controller feature for MXC

2012-11-18 Thread Benoît Thébaudeau
Dear Marek Vasut, On Wednesday, November 7, 2012 3:13:51 PM, Marek Vasut wrote: > Dear Lucas Stach, > > > Dear Marek Vasut, > > > > Am Mittwoch, den 07.11.2012, 14:25 +0100 schrieb Marek Vasut: > > Now I would still argue that we should keep the two step init > > model, > > first we instantiate

Re: [U-Boot] usb: ehci: Take advantage of the new multi-controller feature for MXC

2012-11-18 Thread Marek Vasut
Dear Benoît Thébaudeau, > Dear Marek Vasut, > > On Wednesday, November 7, 2012 3:13:51 PM, Marek Vasut wrote: > > Dear Lucas Stach, > > > > > Dear Marek Vasut, > > > > > > Am Mittwoch, den 07.11.2012, 14:25 +0100 schrieb Marek Vasut: > > > Now I would still argue that we should keep the two ste

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] OMAP3 SPI : Fixed bugs related to SPI transfer

2012-11-18 Thread Ajoy Das
Hi Peter   I described the entire patch in small paragraphs   so it is better to understand      The first paragraph is for posted writes   (courtesy linux OMAP3 SPI driver code)   The last three paragraphs actually fixes the   bug related to the operation of the OMAP3   SPI controller in TX_ONL

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 3/4] dtc/libfdt: introduce fdt types for annotation by endian checkers

2012-11-18 Thread David Gibson
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 11:12:04PM -0600, Kim Phillips wrote: > On Thu, 15 Nov 2012 15:43:40 +1100 > David Gibson wrote: > > > On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 06:59:58PM -0600, Kim Phillips wrote: > > > +#define EXTRACT_BYTE(x, n) ((unsigned long long)((uint8_t *)&x)[n]) > > > +#define __SWAB16(x) ((EXTR

[U-Boot] sam9x5 can't find Nand flash

2012-11-18 Thread alex
Hi MAINTAINER: Now I develop our product based on sam9x25 EVK, and redefine our NAND partitions. I set u-boot environment in flash address0x8. if "saveenv" and "reset", u-boot will print "can't find NAND flash". If I set u-boot environment in the address 0xc as EVK board, it's OK. I ca

Re: [U-Boot] sam9x5 can't find Nand flash

2012-11-18 Thread Bo Shen
Hi Alex, On 11/19/2012 10:55, alex wrote: Hi MAINTAINER: Now I develop our product based on sam9x25 EVK, and redefine our NAND partitions. I set u-boot environment in flash address0x8. if "saveenv" and "reset", u-boot will print "can't find NAND flash". If I set u-boot environment in th

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 3/8] mx6qsabrelite: Configure CONFIG_BOOTDELAY to one second

2012-11-18 Thread Liu Hui-R64343
>-Original Message- >From: Fabio Estevam [mailto:feste...@gmail.com] >Sent: Friday, November 16, 2012 11:09 PM >To: sba...@denx.de >Cc: Liu Hui-R64343; u-boot@lists.denx.de; Estevam Fabio-R49496 >Subject: [PATCH 3/8] mx6qsabrelite: Configure CONFIG_BOOTDELAY to one >second > >From: Fabio Es

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 4/8] mx6qsabre_common: Configure CONFIG_BOOTDELAY to one second

2012-11-18 Thread Liu Hui-R64343
>-Original Message- >From: Fabio Estevam [mailto:feste...@gmail.com] >Sent: Friday, November 16, 2012 11:09 PM >To: sba...@denx.de >Cc: Liu Hui-R64343; u-boot@lists.denx.de; Estevam Fabio-R49496 >Subject: [PATCH 4/8] mx6qsabre_common: Configure CONFIG_BOOTDELAY to >one second > >From: Fabio

Re: [U-Boot] ping failed; host 192.168.1.101 is not alive

2012-11-18 Thread akdas75
Hi I have submitted the patch http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/199895/ It required little more fixes in OMAP3 SPI code. Now its working like a charm There are no changes need to be done in enc28j60 code. Attach logs for your reference http://old.nabble.com/file/p34695543/working.cap working.c

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 0/5 v2] Add DT based ethernet driver for SMDK5250

2012-11-18 Thread Hatim Rv
Hello, Are there any other comments on this patch series? Can these be merged with the u-boot-samsung? Regards, Hatim Ali -- Forwarded message -- From: Simon Glass Date: Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 5:18 AM Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 0/5 v2] Add DT based ethernet driver for SMDK5250 To

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 0/8 v3] Add TMU support for Exynos5250 based SMDK5250

2012-11-18 Thread Hatim Rv
Hello, Any other comments on this series? Can this be merged with the u-boot-samsung? Regards, Hatim Ali On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 4:32 AM, Simon Glass wrote: > Hi Hatim, > > On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 1:14 AM, Hatim Ali wrote: >> This patch series adds support for TMU driver using device tree for >

Re: [U-Boot] sam9x5 can't find Nand flash

2012-11-18 Thread alex
more information. samba script as below: ## Falshing binaries puts "-I- === Initialize the NAND access ===" NANDFLASH::Init puts "-I- === Enable PMECC OS Parameters ===" NANDFLASH::NandHeaderValue HEADER 0xc0c00405 puts "-I- === Erase all the NAND flash blocs and test the erasing ===" NANDFLASH:

Re: [U-Boot] sam9x5 can't find Nand flash

2012-11-18 Thread Bo Shen
Hi Alex, On 11/19/2012 13:40, alex wrote: more information. samba script as below: ## Falshing binaries puts "-I- === Initialize the NAND access ===" NANDFLASH::Init puts "-I- === Enable PMECC OS Parameters ===" NANDFLASH::NandHeaderValue HEADER 0xc0c00405 puts "-I- === Erase all the NAND fla

Re: [U-Boot] analyze/change assembly code

2012-11-18 Thread Gerlando Falauto
Hi Albert, On 11/10/2012 12:25 PM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote: Hi Gerlando, On Tue, 30 Oct 2012 12:08:01 +0100, Gerlando Falauto wrote: Hi all, we recently to had face some nasty issues, where for some reason two (functionally identical) versions of some code behave very differently. Namely, one

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] mx5: Mark lowlevel_init board-specific code

2012-11-18 Thread Stefano Babic
On 16/11/2012 23:42, Benoît Thébaudeau wrote: > Hi Stefano, > > On Wednesday, November 7, 2012 3:29:14 PM, Stefano Babic wrote: >> On 05/11/2012 21:07, Benoît Thébaudeau wrote: >>> The mx5 lowlevel_init.S contains board-specific code based on the >>> reference >>> design. Let's keep it since it av

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/4] mx5: Align SPI CS naming with i.MX53 reference manual

2012-11-18 Thread Stefano Babic
On 15/11/2012 22:23, Fabio Estevam wrote: > From: Fabio Estevam > > Align SPI chip select naming with i.MX53 reference manual. > > Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam > --- Applied (whole series) to u-boot-imx, thanks. Best regards, Stefano Babic --

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/8] mx28evk: Configure CONFIG_BOOTDELAY to one second

2012-11-18 Thread Stefano Babic
On 16/11/2012 16:09, Fabio Estevam wrote: > From: Fabio Estevam > > One second is enough time for users to react in case they want to stop the > booting process. > > Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam > --- > include/configs/mx28evk.h |2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > d

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] ehci-mxc: Fix host power mask bit for i.MX25

2012-11-18 Thread Stefano Babic
On 16/11/2012 17:46, Benoît Thébaudeau wrote: > The correct bit for H1_PM is 16, not 8, which is the DP pull-up impedance > selection bit. > > This issue has been reported by Eric Bénard and fixed by > Christoph Fritz on Linux, from which these > #define-s > had been copied. > > Signed-off-by:

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] ehci-mxc: Fix host power mask bit for i.MX35

2012-11-18 Thread Stefano Babic
On 16/11/2012 12:42, Benoît Thébaudeau wrote: > The correct bit for H1_PM is 16, not 8, which is the DP pull-up impedance > selection bit. > > This issue has been reported by Michael Burkey and fixed > by > Christoph Fritz on Linux, from which these > #define-s > had been copied. > > Signed-o

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] mx5: Mark lowlevel_init board-specific code

2012-11-18 Thread Stefano Babic
On 05/11/2012 21:07, Benoît Thébaudeau wrote: > The mx5 lowlevel_init.S contains board-specific code based on the reference > design. Let's keep it since it avoids creating new lowlevel_init files and it > may be used by many boards. But add a config to make it optional in order not > to > cause i