[U-Boot] mxsboot vs. imximage (was: Re: [PATCH 4/8] mxsboot: stop referring to i.MX28 as this ought to work for all i.MXS SoCs)

2012-06-02 Thread Dirk Behme
Hi Marek, On 30.05.2012 07:49, Marek Vasut wrote: Dear Wolfgang Denk, Dear Otavio Salvador, In message<1336866018-614-5-git-send-email-ota...@ossystems.com.br> you wrote: Signed-off-by: Otavio Salvador --- tools/mxsboot.c | 110 +++

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v8] kirkwood: add NAS62x0 board support

2012-06-02 Thread Luka Perkov
Hi Michael, On Fri, Jun 01, 2012 at 11:03:16PM +0200, Michael Walle wrote: > > +/* > > + * Machine type > > + */ > > +#define CONFIG_MACH_TYPE MACH_TYPE_NAS6210 > > btw i guess this will break in about half a year. because: > - uboot follows mach-types.h from the kernel > - the kernel will on

Re: [U-Boot] mxsboot vs. imximage (was: Re: [PATCH 4/8] mxsboot: stop referring to i.MX28 as this ought to work for all i.MXS SoCs)

2012-06-02 Thread Marek Vasut
Dear Dirk Behme, > Hi Marek, > > On 30.05.2012 07:49, Marek Vasut wrote: > > Dear Wolfgang Denk, > > > >> Dear Otavio Salvador, > >> > >> In message<1336866018-614-5-git-send-email-ota...@ossystems.com.br> you > > > > wrote: > >>> Signed-off-by: Otavio Salvador > >>> --- > >>> > >>> tools/

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v8] kirkwood: add NAS62x0 board support

2012-06-02 Thread Marek Vasut
Dear Luka Perkov, > Hi Michael, > > On Fri, Jun 01, 2012 at 11:03:16PM +0200, Michael Walle wrote: > > > +/* > > > + * Machine type > > > + */ > > > +#define CONFIG_MACH_TYPE MACH_TYPE_NAS6210 > > > > btw i guess this will break in about half a year. because: > > - uboot follows mach-types.h fr

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v8] kirkwood: add NAS62x0 board support

2012-06-02 Thread Luka Perkov
Hi Marek, On Sat, Jun 02, 2012 at 10:31:46AM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 01, 2012 at 11:03:16PM +0200, Michael Walle wrote: > > > > +/* > > > > + * Machine type > > > > + */ > > > > +#define CONFIG_MACH_TYPE MACH_TYPE_NAS6210 > > > > > > btw i guess this will break in about ha

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] Added watchdog support for davinchi_dm365evm

2012-06-02 Thread Stijn Souffriau
Hello Heiko, First of all, sorry it took so long for me to reply. Because the code in arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/davinci/timer.c didn't work for the davinci dm365evm, I tried. If you look at the code you will find that the operations are similar but different. Maybe this code works for more chip

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] Added watchdog support for davinchi_dm365evm

2012-06-02 Thread Stijn Souffriau
On 05/20/2012 08:59 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: On Sunday 20 May 2012 12:50:40 Stijn Souffriau wrote: --- a/board/davinci/dm365evm/dm365evm.c +++ b/board/davinci/dm365evm/dm365evm.c +#ifdef CONFIG_HW_WATCHDOG +static struct davinci_timer * const wdttimer = +(struct davinci_timer *)CONFIG_

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] Added u-boot header generating functionality to ublimage

2012-06-02 Thread Stijn Souffriau
On 05/21/2012 08:30 AM, Heiko Schocher wrote: Hello Stijn, Stijn Souffriau wrote: --- tools/ublimage.c | 19 +++ tools/ublimage.h |2 ++ 2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/ublimage.c b/tools/ublimage.c index d6b4017..527b1a4 100644 --

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 9/9] mx6qsabrelite: Add splaschscreen support

2012-06-02 Thread Fabio Estevam
Hi Dirk, On Sat, Jun 2, 2012 at 3:46 AM, Dirk Behme wrote: > On 31.05.2012 19:24, Fabio Estevam wrote: >> >> Add splaschscreen support. > > > Here and in the subject a typo? splaschscreen -> splashscreen? Thanks, I will fix this and rework this patch according to your I2C suggestion. Regards,

[U-Boot] Support for drives larger than 2.1TB with U-Boot & Kirkwood

2012-06-02 Thread David Purdy
Hello, Does anyone in the community here have experience (first-hand, preferably) & knowledge regarding the use of drives larger than 2.1TB? It is my understanding that CONFIG_EFI_PARTITION and CONFIG_SYS_64BIT_LBA both required - but is there anything else that needs to be switched on? Peculia

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 9/9] mx6qsabrelite: Add splaschscreen support

2012-06-02 Thread Dirk Behme
On 02.06.2012 20:22, Fabio Estevam wrote: Hi Dirk, On Sat, Jun 2, 2012 at 3:46 AM, Dirk Behme wrote: On 31.05.2012 19:24, Fabio Estevam wrote: Add splaschscreen support. Here and in the subject a typo? splaschscreen -> splashscreen? Thanks, I will fix this and rework this patch accordi

[U-Boot] [PATCH resend] Added watchdog support for davinchi_dm365evm

2012-06-02 Thread Stijn Souffriau
--- arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/davinci/dm365.c | 61 arch/arm/include/asm/arch-davinci/timer_defs.h |2 + board/davinci/dm365evm/dm365evm.c | 19 include/configs/davinci_dm365evm.h | 11 + 4 files changed, 93 insertions(+

[U-Boot] [PATCH resend] Added UBL_MAGIC_PLL number for ublimage + added automatic page size calculation

2012-06-02 Thread Stijn Souffriau
--- tools/mkimage.h |6 ++ tools/ublimage.c | 29 +++-- tools/ublimage.h |2 ++ 3 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/mkimage.h b/tools/mkimage.h index 5fe1a48..cd835f0 100644 --- a/tools/mkimage.h +++ b/tools/mkimage.h @@ -140

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 9/9] mx6qsabrelite: Add splaschscreen support

2012-06-02 Thread Fabio Estevam
Hi Dirk, On Sat, Jun 2, 2012 at 3:52 PM, Dirk Behme wrote: > Maybe you could check [1] > > -#define CONFIG_SYS_I2C_SLAVE            0xfe > +#define CONFIG_SYS_I2C_SLAVE    0x1f > > then? I'm no I2C expert and I wasn't sure what to use for > CONFIG_SYS_I2C_SLAVE. Yes, 0x1f is the correct address

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 9/9] mx6qsabrelite: Add splaschscreen support

2012-06-02 Thread Troy Kisky
On 6/2/2012 3:36 PM, Fabio Estevam wrote: Hi Dirk, On Sat, Jun 2, 2012 at 3:52 PM, Dirk Behme wrote: Maybe you could check [1] -#define CONFIG_SYS_I2C_SLAVE0xfe +#define CONFIG_SYS_I2C_SLAVE0x1f then? I'm no I2C expert and I wasn't sure what to use for CONFIG_SYS_I2C_SLAVE.

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] tegra: trimslice: fix a couple typos

2012-06-02 Thread Igor Grinberg
On 06/01/12 18:45, Marek Vasut wrote: > Dear Stephen Warren, > >> On 06/01/2012 12:38 AM, Igor Grinberg wrote: >>> On 05/31/12 19:50, Stephen Warren wrote: On 05/31/2012 04:13 AM, Marek Vasut wrote: > Dear Igor Grinberg, > >> On 05/30/12 19:45, Stephen Warren wrote: >>> From: