Re: [U-Boot] [RFC][Timer API] Revised Specification - Implementation details

2011-05-27 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Graeme Russ, In message you wrote: > > I think we will need to define get_timer() weak - Nios will have to > override the default implementation to cater for it's (Nios') limitations Please don't - isn't the purpose of this whole discussion to use common code for this ? Best regards, Wo

Re: [U-Boot] [RFC][Timer API] Revised Specification - Implementation details

2011-05-27 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Graeme Russ, In message you wrote: > > I think we should - If CONFIG_SYS_HZ _MUST_ be 1000 anyway, what is the > point. Also, get_timer() utilisation as it stands for the most part already > assumes a 1ms time base. Maybe we should change get_timer() to > get_ms_timer() to avoid any ambiguit

Re: [U-Boot] [RFC][Timer API] Revised Specification - Implementation details

2011-05-27 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear "J. William Campbell", In message <4ddefdbc.7050...@comcast.net> you wrote: > > I really STRONGLY disagree with this statement. If you actually needed > 64 bit variables, fine use them. But as I have already shown, you do not > need them in general. We are computing a 32 bit result. There

Re: [U-Boot] [RFC][Timer API] Revised Specification - Implementation details

2011-05-27 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear "J. William Campbell", In message <4ddf2072.5090...@comcast.net> you wrote: ... > The problem is that the way we previously detected wrapping does not > work if the interrupt rate is == to the counter wrap time, which it > essentially always is. If get_ticks is trying to update the wrap cou

Re: [U-Boot] [RFC][Timer API] Revised Specification - Implementation details

2011-05-27 Thread Graeme Russ
Hi Wolfgang, On 27/05/11 17:17, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Dear Graeme Russ, > > In message you wrote: >> >> I think we should - If CONFIG_SYS_HZ _MUST_ be 1000 anyway, what is the >> point. Also, get_timer() utilisation as it stands for the most part already >> assumes a 1ms time base. Maybe we sho

Re: [U-Boot] [RFC][Timer API] Revised Specification - Implementation details

2011-05-27 Thread Graeme Russ
Hi Wolfgang, On 27/05/11 17:13, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Dear Graeme Russ, > > In message you wrote: >> >> I think we will need to define get_timer() weak - Nios will have to >> override the default implementation to cater for it's (Nios') limitations > > Please don't - isn't the purpose of this

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 3/3] omap3_beagle: enable EHCI and USB storage.

2011-05-27 Thread Alexander Holler
Am 26.05.2011 17:41, schrieb Alexander Holler: > Am 26.05.2011 13:30, schrieb Christian Spielberger: ... > But even than USB doesn't seem to work on a BeagleBoard XM (at least > some people told me so). I don't have a XM, so I can't help more there. > It might be a problem with (a needed reset of)

Re: [U-Boot] [RFC][Timer API] Revised Specification - Implementation details

2011-05-27 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Simon Glass, In message you wrote: > > >> I guess you cannot, at least not in general. In worst case that would > >> mean we have to process 1e6 interrupts per second, which leaves little > >> time for anything useful. > > Sorry Wolfgang I don't really understand this. We would only proces

Re: [U-Boot] [RFC][Timer API] Revised Specification - Implementation details

2011-05-27 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Graeme Russ, In message <4ddf53d3.1060...@gmail.com> you wrote: > > > No. At least not unless you also provide other get__timer() > > functions which we most likely will not do. > > I think you will find most platforms will support get_us_timer() trivially. > Those that can't can use get_ms

Re: [U-Boot] [RFC][Timer API] Revised Specification - Implementation details

2011-05-27 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Graeme Russ, In message <4ddf543d.6020...@gmail.com> you wrote: > > >> I think we will need to define get_timer() weak - Nios will have to > >> override the default implementation to cater for it's (Nios') limitations > > > > Please don't - isn't the purpose of this whole discussion to use

Re: [U-Boot] [RFC][Timer API] Revised Specification - Implementation details

2011-05-27 Thread Graeme Russ
Hi Wolfgang On Friday, May 27, 2011, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Dear Graeme Russ, > > In message <4ddf543d.6020...@gmail.com> you wrote: >> >> >> I think we will need to define get_timer() weak - Nios will have to >> >> override the default implementation to cater for it's (Nios') limitations >> > >>

Re: [U-Boot] [RFC][Timer API] Revised Specification - Implementation details

2011-05-27 Thread Graeme Russ
On Friday, May 27, 2011, Graeme Russ wrote: > Hi Wolfgang > > On Friday, May 27, 2011, Wolfgang Denk wrote: >> Dear Graeme Russ, >> >> In message <4ddf543d.6020...@gmail.com> you wrote: >>> >>> >> I think we will need to define get_timer() weak - Nios will have to >>> >> override the default impl

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 4/4] [v3] cmd_nand: add nand write.trimffs command

2011-05-27 Thread Detlev Zundel
Hi Ben, > Add another nand write. variant, trimffs. This command will request of > nand_write_skip_bad() that all trailing all-0xff pages will be > dropped from eraseblocks when they are written to flash as-per the > reccommended behaviour of the UBI FAQ [1]. > > The function that implements this

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 3/4] [v3] nand_util: drop trailing all-0xff pages if requested

2011-05-27 Thread Detlev Zundel
Hi Ben, > Add a flag to nand_read_skip_bad() such that if true, any trailing > pages in an eraseblock whose contents are entirely 0xff will be > dropped. > > The implementation is via a new drop_ffs() function which is > based on the function of the same name from the ubiformat > utility by Artem

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 3/3] omap3_beagle: enable EHCI and USB storage.

2011-05-27 Thread Christian Spielberger
On 05/27/2011 09:34 AM, Alexander Holler wrote: > Am 26.05.2011 17:41, schrieb Alexander Holler: >> Am 26.05.2011 13:30, schrieb Christian Spielberger: > ... >> But even than USB doesn't seem to work on a BeagleBoard XM (at least >> some people told me so). I don't have a XM, so I can't help more t

[U-Boot] TFTP Mcast, IGMP support

2011-05-27 Thread jaypee
Am I right in thinking there is no IGMP support for TFTP Mcast or do those chips that have mcast() functions do it automatically? Would there be interest in a patch to provide rudimentary IGMP support? Thinking IGMPv2 join group, no report responses. Just enough to get some traffic. JP __

[U-Boot] UPMA and UPMB on TQM885D

2011-05-27 Thread Luigi Rizzi
Hello, I'm using u-boot 2010.09 on TQM885D board. In this system UPMA is programmed for SDRAM, but now I would like to use this UPM for another external memory. In your opinion it's possible to program UPMB instead of UPMA for the SDRAM management? In other words can I exchange UPMA with UPMB(th

Re: [U-Boot] Interrupt handler in U-Boot for MIPS based platform

2011-05-27 Thread Detlev Zundel
Hi Pandu, > Hi all, > > I was working on enabling the watchdog timer in the U-Boot for MIPS > based platform. I set up the timer and watchdog. when the timer expires, I > need to kick the watchdog until the user timeout period expires. > I see that for ARM we have do_irq function which gets ca

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] ARM: i.MX51: Config option to disable PLL1

2011-05-27 Thread Stefano Babic
On 05/26/2011 07:00 PM, David Jander wrote: > i.MX51 PLL1 seems to have stability problems. It is advised to not use it, > although it is unclear whether all boards and/or chip revisions have this > problem. Using PLL2 for the core and DDR2 seems to fix the problem. > No official errata yet. > Hi

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] ARM: i.MX51: Config option to disable PLL1

2011-05-27 Thread Stefano Babic
On 05/26/2011 07:45 PM, David Jander wrote: > On Thu, 26 May 2011 19:00:14 +0200 > David Jander wrote: > Hi David, > I would like to have some feedback before resubmitting the patch with the > amended commit message. I would also like to know whether I should include > another patch fixing all

Re: [U-Boot] Is there a working 2011 version of u-boot on i.MX31?

2011-05-27 Thread Stefano Babic
On 05/26/2011 06:11 PM, Helmut Raiger wrote: > Hi, > Hi Helmut, > I tried to upgrade my 2010/09 version of u-boot for our i.MX31 > board, fixed the stuff needed for the new relocation scheme and ... > nothing, ... no prompt, so I compiled for mx31pdk (without any change of > source code)

Re: [U-Boot] [RFC][Timer API] Revised Specification - Implementation details

2011-05-27 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Graeme Russ, In message you wrote: > > > Nobody claims that get_timer() has any specific resolution. It is > > perfectly legal that a loop like > > > > for (;;) { > > u32t = get_time(); > > > > printf("t=%ul\n", t); > > } > > > > returns 100 m

Re: [U-Boot] [RFC][Timer API] Revised Specification - Implementation details

2011-05-27 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Graeme Russ, In message you wrote: > > Besides, Nios can return an increment of 10 (presumably ms) between > two immediately consecutive calls. This causes early timeouts in CFI > driver Now this in turn is a bug in the timer implementation that needs to be fixed. Best regards, Wolfgang D

[U-Boot] Linux 2.6.33.9 (RT) on mpc5121

2011-05-27 Thread Einar Már Björgvinsson
hi I'm not sure if this is the proper list for posting this question but it seems to me that there are some folks here that have vast experience of the mpc5121 chip, so here it goes. I'm currently trying to port an older kernel version (2.6.33-rc6 non realtime) to a newer one (2.6.33.9 wit

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 3/3] omap3_beagle: enable EHCI and USB storage.

2011-05-27 Thread Alexander Holler
Am 27.05.2011 11:40, schrieb Christian Spielberger: > On 05/27/2011 09:34 AM, Alexander Holler wrote: >> Am 26.05.2011 17:41, schrieb Alexander Holler: >>> Am 26.05.2011 13:30, schrieb Christian Spielberger: >> ... >>> But even than USB doesn't seem to work on a BeagleBoard XM (at least >>> some pe

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] ARM: i.MX51: Config option to disable PLL1

2011-05-27 Thread David Jander
On Fri, 27 May 2011 12:13:32 +0200 Stefano Babic wrote: > On 05/26/2011 07:00 PM, David Jander wrote: > > i.MX51 PLL1 seems to have stability problems. It is advised to not use it, > > although it is unclear whether all boards and/or chip revisions have this > > problem. Using PLL2 for the core a

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] powerpc/85xx: Fix compile errors if CONFIG_SYS_{BR, OR}0_PRELIM aren't set

2011-05-27 Thread Kumar Gala
On May 20, 2011, at 1:06 AM, Kumar Gala wrote: > Add ifdef protection in LBC code to handle the case in which > CONFIG_SYS_BR0_PRELIM and CONFIG_SYS_OR0_PRELIM arent defined for a > build. > > Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala > --- > arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc8xxx/fsl_lbc.c |2 ++ > 1 files changed, 2 in

[U-Boot] [RFC][Timer API] Revised Specification - Implementation details

2011-05-27 Thread Graeme Russ
Hi Wolfgang On Friday, May 27, 2011, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Dear Graeme Russ, > > In message you wrote: >> >> Besides, Nios can return an increment of 10 (presumably ms) between >> two immediately consecutive calls. This causes early timeouts in CFI >> driver > > Now this in turn is a bug in the

Re: [U-Boot] Linux 2.6.33.9 (RT) on mpc5121

2011-05-27 Thread David Jander
On Fri, 27 May 2011 11:34:53 + Einar Már Björgvinsson wrote: > hi > > I'm not sure if this is the proper list for posting this question but it > seems to me that there are some folks here that have vast experience of the > mpc5121 chip, so here it goes. It is indeed not the correct list

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v5 1/4] MX5: Make the weim structure complete

2011-05-27 Thread Stefano Babic
On 05/27/2011 02:40 PM, Fabio Estevam wrote: > Hi Stefano, > > Does this patch series look fine now? > Hi Fabio, I have no comments about your last post. However, as you posted the first patchset for the MX53ARD when the merge window was already closed (not last Wolfgang has already published t

Re: [U-Boot] [RFC][Timer API] Revised Specification - Implementation details

2011-05-27 Thread Scott McNutt
Graeme Russ wrote: > Hi Wolfgang > > On Friday, May 27, 2011, Wolfgang Denk wrote: >> Dear Graeme Russ, >> >> In message you wrote: >>> Besides, Nios can return an increment of 10 (presumably ms) between >>> two immediately consecutive calls. This causes early timeouts in CFI >>> driver >> Now t

Re: [U-Boot] [RFC][Timer API] Revised Specification - Implementation details

2011-05-27 Thread J. William Campbell
On 5/27/2011 12:28 AM, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Dear "J. William Campbell", > > In message<4ddefdbc.7050...@comcast.net> you wrote: >> I really STRONGLY disagree with this statement. If you actually needed >> 64 bit variables, fine use them. But as I have already shown, you do not >> need them in ge

[U-Boot] [PATCH v2] NAND: Add 16bit NAND support for the NDFC

2011-05-27 Thread Alex Waterman
>From dc3cda4054bc94c2ae3c1d104b5162681a16e7ac Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Alex Waterman Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 15:08:36 -0400 Subject: [PATCH v2] NAND: Add 16bit NAND support for the NDFC This patch adds support for 16 bit NAND devices attached to the NDFC on ppc4xx processors. Two config en

[U-Boot] [PATCH 0/5] mpc5200: digsy_mtc: update for next

2011-05-27 Thread Anatolij Gustschin
This patch series mainly updates digsy_mtc board to initialize graphic extention hardware and add splash screen support. The last patch is an update for "mtc appreg" command. Anatolij Gustschin (5): video: mb862xx: support Coral-PA controller pci: option for configurable delay between pci rese

[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/5] video: mb862xx: support Coral-PA controller

2011-05-27 Thread Anatolij Gustschin
Add detection of Coral-PA and configure Coral CCF an MMR parameters using CONFIG_SYS_MB862xx_CCF and CONFIG_SYS_MB862xx_MMR macros. Use CCF and MMR parameters for Coral-P Eval. Board if the appropriate macros weren't defined. Signed-off-by: Anatolij Gustschin --- drivers/video/mb862xx.c | 32 +

[U-Boot] [PATCH 2/5] pci: option for configurable delay between pci reset and pci bus scan

2011-05-27 Thread Anatolij Gustschin
PCI cards might need some time after reset to respond. On some boards (mpc5200 or mpc8260 based) the PCI bus reset is deasserted at pci_board_init() time, so we can not use available "pcidelay" option for waiting before pci bus scan here. Add an option to delay bus scan by setting "pci_scan_delay"

[U-Boot] [PATCH 3/5] mpc5200: digsy_mtc: enable pci_scan_delay option

2011-05-27 Thread Anatolij Gustschin
A delay of approximately 250 ms after PCI bus reset in pci_mpc5xxx_init() is needed to recognize the Coral-PA controller on graphic extention board. With this option enabled we can set the environment variable "pci_scan_delay" to the needed value. Signed-off-by: Anatolij Gustschin --- include/co

[U-Boot] [PATCH 4/5] mpc5200: digsy_mtc: add support for graphic extension board

2011-05-27 Thread Anatolij Gustschin
Add detection and initialisation for graphic extension board and support splash screen when booting. Enable "bmp" command in the board configuration and provide "disp" command to be able to switch the display on/off. Signed-off-by: Anatolij Gustschin --- board/digsy_mtc/Makefile|7 +++--

[U-Boot] [PATCH 5/5] mpc5200: digsy_mtc: add support for writing 'appreg' value

2011-05-27 Thread Anatolij Gustschin
Up to now only reading 'appreg' value was implemented in the digsyMTC special 'mtc appreg' command. Extend the command to support writing appreg value, too. Signed-off-by: Werner Pfister Signed-off-by: Anatolij Gustschin --- board/digsy_mtc/cmd_mtc.c | 46 +

Re: [U-Boot] [RFC][Timer API] Revised Specification - Implementation details

2011-05-27 Thread J. William Campbell
On 5/27/2011 12:33 AM, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Dear "J. William Campbell", > > In message<4ddf2072.5090...@comcast.net> you wrote: > ... >> The problem is that the way we previously detected wrapping does not >> work if the interrupt rate is == to the counter wrap time, which it >> essentially alwa

Re: [U-Boot] [RFC][Timer API] Revised Specification - Implementation details

2011-05-27 Thread J. William Campbell
On 5/27/2011 12:35 AM, Graeme Russ wrote: > Hi Wolfgang, > > On 27/05/11 17:13, Wolfgang Denk wrote: >> Dear Graeme Russ, >> >> In message you wrote: >>> I think we will need to define get_timer() weak - Nios will have to >>> override the default implementation to cater for it's (Nios') limitation

Re: [U-Boot] [RFC][Timer API] Revised Specification - Implementation details

2011-05-27 Thread Simon Glass
On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 12:40 AM, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Dear Simon Glass, > > In message you wrote: >> >> >> I guess you cannot, at least not in general.  In worst case that would >> >> mean we have to process 1e6 interrupts per second, which leaves little >> >> time for anything useful. >> >> S

[U-Boot] [PULL] U-Boot-pxa pull request

2011-05-27 Thread Marek Vasut
Hi, please pull my git://git.denx.de/u-boot-pxa ixp branch into your u- boot/master branch. Thanks These are mostly the IXP changes + I added the fix I promissed you half a year ago ... damn the time runs fast :-/ Cheers The following changes since commit 5d1ee00b1fe1180503f6dfc10e87a6c6e74778f

Re: [U-Boot] [RFC][Timer API] Revised Specification - Implementation details

2011-05-27 Thread Simon Glass
On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 12:45 AM, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Dear Graeme Russ, > > In message <4ddf53d3.1060...@gmail.com> you wrote: >> >> > No. At least not unless you also provide other get__timer() >> > functions which we most likely will not do. >> >> I think you will find most platforms will sup

Re: [U-Boot] [RFC][Timer API] Revised Specification - Implementation details

2011-05-27 Thread J. William Campbell
On 5/27/2011 6:07 AM, Scott McNutt wrote: > Graeme Russ wrote: >> Hi Wolfgang >> >> On Friday, May 27, 2011, Wolfgang Denk wrote: >>> Dear Graeme Russ, >>> >>> In message you >>> wrote: Besides, Nios can return an increment of 10 (presumably ms) between two immediately consecutive call

Re: [U-Boot] [RFC][Timer API] Revised Specification - Implementation details

2011-05-27 Thread Simon Glass
On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 8:00 AM, J. William Campbell wrote: [snip] > Hi All, >     A more precise statement of the problem is that all timer delays > may be shortened by the timer resolution. So this means that if you have > a timeout of 1 ms in your get_time(0) {   } while ( ... < 1), then your >

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/5] pci: option for configurable delay between pci reset and pci bus scan

2011-05-27 Thread Detlev Zundel
Hi Anatolij, > PCI cards might need some time after reset to respond. > On some boards (mpc5200 or mpc8260 based) the PCI bus reset is > deasserted at pci_board_init() time, so we can not use available > "pcidelay" option for waiting before pci bus scan here. Add an option > to delay bus scan by s

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 3/5] mpc5200: digsy_mtc: enable pci_scan_delay option

2011-05-27 Thread Detlev Zundel
Hi Anatolij, > A delay of approximately 250 ms after PCI bus reset in > pci_mpc5xxx_init() is needed to recognize the Coral-PA > controller on graphic extention board. With this option > enabled we can set the environment variable "pci_scan_delay" > to the needed value. > > Signed-off-by: Anatolij

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 4/5] mpc5200: digsy_mtc: add support for graphic extension board

2011-05-27 Thread Detlev Zundel
Hi Anatolij, > Add detection and initialisation for graphic extension board > and support splash screen when booting. Enable "bmp" command > in the board configuration and provide "disp" command to > be able to switch the display on/off. > > Signed-off-by: Anatolij Gustschin > --- [...] > boar

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 5/5] mpc5200: digsy_mtc: add support for writing 'appreg' value

2011-05-27 Thread Detlev Zundel
Hi Anatolij, > Up to now only reading 'appreg' value was implemented in the > digsyMTC special 'mtc appreg' command. Extend the command to > support writing appreg value, too. > > Signed-off-by: Werner Pfister > Signed-off-by: Anatolij Gustschin > --- > board/digsy_mtc/cmd_mtc.c | 46

[U-Boot] Coding style fixed on Samsung sdk2410

2011-05-27 Thread Peter.K
Hello: I created a simple coding style patch by checkpatch.pl for Samsung sdk2410. May I upload the patch to mail list? Thanks. Peter Kong. ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot

Re: [U-Boot] [RFC][Timer API] Revised Specification - Implementation details

2011-05-27 Thread J. William Campbell
On 5/26/2011 11:54 PM, Graeme Russ wrote: > On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 4:33 PM, J. William Campbell > wrote: >> On 5/26/2011 9:33 PM, Graeme Russ wrote: >>> Hi Bill, >>> >> > [massive snip] > > OK, you have my ears pricked - Can you give me code samples for: > > - get_ticks() > - sync_timbase()

Re: [U-Boot] [RFC][Timer API] Revised Specification - Implementation details

2011-05-27 Thread Scott McNutt
J. William Campbell wrote: > On 5/27/2011 6:07 AM, Scott McNutt wrote: >> Graeme Russ wrote: >>> Hi Wolfgang >>> >>> On Friday, May 27, 2011, Wolfgang Denk wrote: Dear Graeme Russ, In message you wrote: > Besides, Nios can return an increment of 10 (presumably ms) between

Re: [U-Boot] [RFC][Timer API] Revised Specification - Implementation details

2011-05-27 Thread J. William Campbell
On 5/27/2011 8:44 AM, Scott McNutt wrote: > J. William Campbell wrote: >> On 5/27/2011 6:07 AM, Scott McNutt wrote: >>> Graeme Russ wrote: Hi Wolfgang On Friday, May 27, 2011, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Dear Graeme Russ, > > In message > you wrote: >> Besides, Nios

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/5] pci: option for configurable delay between pci reset and pci bus scan

2011-05-27 Thread Anatolij Gustschin
Hi Detlev, On Fri, 27 May 2011 17:26:24 +0200 Detlev Zundel wrote: ... > > PCI cards might need some time after reset to respond. > > On some boards (mpc5200 or mpc8260 based) the PCI bus reset is > > deasserted at pci_board_init() time, so we can not use available > > "pcidelay" option for waiti

Re: [U-Boot] [RFC][Timer API] Revised Specification - Implementation details

2011-05-27 Thread J. William Campbell
On 5/27/2011 8:13 AM, Simon Glass wrote: > On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 8:00 AM, J. William Campbell > wrote: > [snip] >> Hi All, >> A more precise statement of the problem is that all timer delays >> may be shortened by the timer resolution. So this means that if you have >> a timeout of 1 ms in

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 4/5] mpc5200: digsy_mtc: add support for graphic extension board

2011-05-27 Thread Anatolij Gustschin
Hi Detlev, On Fri, 27 May 2011 17:33:33 +0200 Detlev Zundel wrote: ... > > board/digsy_mtc/exbo.h | 17 + > > Please fold this into the digsy_mtc.h file. We should not add more > files without proper licensing headers and 17 lines surely do not > justify going to this length.

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 5/5] mpc5200: digsy_mtc: add support for writing 'appreg' value

2011-05-27 Thread Anatolij Gustschin
Hi Detlev, On Fri, 27 May 2011 17:36:01 +0200 Detlev Zundel wrote: ... > > + "must be betwenn 1 and 255\n"); > > Typo, should be "between" I'll fix it. Thanks for catching! Thanks, Anatolij ___ U-Boot mailing list U-B

Re: [U-Boot] omap4 EHCI support and SMSC95xx support on panda

2011-05-27 Thread Peter Meerwald
> >From the traces you show, I am not sure this is what you are missing, > though. The other "detail", is that I used the latest version of > X-loader git, it may enable some clocks that previous versions did not > enable. I would like to rebase the patches on the SPL patches posted where is the

Re: [U-Boot] [RFC][Timer API] Revised Specification - Implementation details

2011-05-27 Thread Graeme Russ
On 28/05/11 01:49, J. William Campbell wrote: > On 5/26/2011 11:54 PM, Graeme Russ wrote: >> On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 4:33 PM, J. William Campbell >> wrote: >>> On 5/26/2011 9:33 PM, Graeme Russ wrote: Hi Bill, >>> >> [massive snip] [another big snip] >> I just realised - the ISR

Re: [U-Boot] Interrupt handler in U-Boot for MIPS based platform

2011-05-27 Thread Shinya Kuribayashi
On 5/27/11 2:44 AM, Pandurang Kale wrote: >Has any one implemented it for MIPS based platform? If not, any hint to > get it working. https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/mydeveloperworks/blogs/ddou/entry/implementing_mips_interrupts_for_u_boot28?lang=en __

Re: [U-Boot] [RFC][Timer API] Revised Specification - Implementation details

2011-05-27 Thread Graeme Russ
Hi Bill, On 28/05/11 00:23, J. William Campbell wrote: > On 5/27/2011 12:35 AM, Graeme Russ wrote: >> Hi Wolfgang, >> >> On 27/05/11 17:13, Wolfgang Denk wrote: >>> Dear Graeme Russ, >>> >>> In message you wrote: I think we will need to define get_timer() weak - Nios will have to overri

Re: [U-Boot] [RFC][Timer API] Revised Specification - Implementation details

2011-05-27 Thread Reinhard Meyer
Dear Graeme Russ, > u32 get_timer(u32 base) > { > if (base != 0) { > if (timer - base< (CONFIG_MIN_TIMER_RESOLUTION * 2)) > return 0; > else > return timer - base - CONFIG_MIN_TIMER_RESOLUTION; > } else { >

[U-Boot] do we have a WindowsXP Application and Driver to download data through MUSB-device in U-Boot?

2011-05-27 Thread yaojin liu
I have asked many people ,but nobody did it. if we have a usb download tools, then we will not need Ethernet anymore! ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot