This patch serie brings the SMDK2410 port in sync with the latest U-Boot
version by doing the following:
- do the necessary adjustments to support the ARM relocation feature
- use the CFI flash driver (and removing the old one)
- remove the unneeded config.mk file
---
board/samsung/smdk2410/M
Signed-off-by: David Müller
---
include/configs/smdk2410.h |7 +++
1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/configs/smdk2410.h b/include/configs/smdk2410.h
index 62fe97e..38b5684 100644
--- a/include/configs/smdk2410.h
+++ b/include/configs/smdk2410.h
@@ -1
Signed-off-by: David Müller
---
board/samsung/smdk2410/config.mk | 25 -
include/configs/smdk2410.h |2 ++
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
delete mode 100644 board/samsung/smdk2410/config.mk
diff --git a/board/samsung/smdk2410/config.mk b/
Signed-off-by: David Müller
---
board/samsung/smdk2410/smdk2410.c | 61 +---
include/configs/smdk2410.h| 141 ++---
2 files changed, 133 insertions(+), 69 deletions(-)
diff --git a/board/samsung/smdk2410/smdk2410.c
b/board/samsung/smdk241
Signed-off-by: David Müller
---
board/samsung/smdk2410/Makefile |2 +-
board/samsung/smdk2410/flash.c| 433 -
board/samsung/smdk2410/smdk2410.c | 12 +
include/configs/smdk2410.h| 32 +--
4 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 454 deletions
On Thu, 10 Mar 2011 16:07:49 +0100
Stefano Babic wrote:
> On 03/10/2011 11:53 AM, Anatolij Gustschin wrote:
> > Add output of the WRSR register content while booting so that
> > we can see the source of the last reset.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Anatolij Gustschin
>
> Hi Antolij,
Hi Stefano,
...
Hi Fabio,
On Thu, 10 Mar 2011 05:47:15 -0800 (PST)
Fabio Estevam wrote:
> Hi Anatolij,
>
> --- On Thu, 3/10/11, Anatolij Gustschin wrote:
>
> > mx31_get_mcu_main_clk() / 100);
> > + struct wdog_regs *wdog = (struct> wdog_regs *)WDOG_BASE;
> > +
> > + printf("CPU: Freesca
On Wed, 9 Mar 2011 13:35:44 -0300
Fabio Estevam wrote:
...
> +++ b/board/freescale/mx31pdk/mx31pdk.c
> @@ -86,7 +86,30 @@ int board_late_init(void)
>
> int checkboard(void)
> {
> - printf("Board: i.MX31 MAX PDK (3DS)\n");
> + u32 cause;
> + struct clock_control_regs *ccm =
> +
On 3/9/11 10:16 PM, daniel.schwierz...@googlemail.com wrote:
> This fixes a linker error introduced by the previous commit.
If so, such fix should be made along with that previous commit.
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/
On 3/9/11 10:16 PM, daniel.schwierz...@googlemail.com wrote:
> All current CPUs and SoCs are based on Mips32 arch. The complete
Is that true? What about purple SoC? IIUC It's based on MIPS 5Kc
and capable of 64-bit, which MIPS32 is 32-bit only architecture.
> code resides in the global arch/mip
On 3/9/11 10:16 PM, daniel.schwierz...@googlemail.com wrote:
> This patch series refactors the Mips CPU directory and put all current
> code into an own mips32 subdirectory. Furthermore the SoC specific code
> of IncaIP, Purple and Au1x00 is moved to separate SoC subdirectories.
Personally I'm not
By the way, please use MIPS: next time, not Mips:
Thanks in advance,
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
On Mar 3, 2011, at 8:59 AM, Jimi Xenidis wrote:
> I was surprised to find myself at the decrement interrupt when running my new
> stuff.
> That is against ePAPR, right?
> Does u-boot at least make sure that the DEC is set to some large value before
> it leaps at me?
> I don't mind forcing EE=0
Hi Shinya,
On 03/12/2011 03:43 PM, Shinya Kuribayashi wrote:
> On 3/9/11 10:16 PM, daniel.schwierz...@googlemail.com wrote:
>> All current CPUs and SoCs are based on Mips32 arch. The complete
>
> Is that true? What about purple SoC? IIUC It's based on MIPS 5Kc
> and capable of 64-bit, which MIPS32
14 matches
Mail list logo
