Hi,
I’m now trying interrupt in uboot, the code to initial tzic is
referred from tzic.c in kernel. (see mxc_tzic_init_irq below)
After that, I turn on INT 0~63 by:
writel(0x, TZIC_ENSET0);
writel(0x, TZIC_ENSET0 + 4);
But I always cannot see any status change reflected in TZIC_HIP
Dear Mike Frysinger,
In message <201102170037.42565.vap...@gentoo.org> you wrote:
>
> > I usually do this on the fly using shell scripting capabilities, i.e.
> > something like this (copying some shell functions from MAKEALL):
...
> this is is generally useful, perhaps MAKEALL should grow a flag
On Wed, 16 Feb 2011 18:31:23 +0100
Reinhard Meyer wrote:
>
> Not sure, the driver builds fine with ARM boards.
> Maybe you need to have CONFIG_NET_MULTI set?
>
> Best Regards,
> Reinhard
Yes, I have CONFIG_NET_MULTI (mainly I've taken those entries from
top900 and lpc2292 configs).
That's how I
On 02/17/2011 09:04 AM, arden jay wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Question:
> 1.from entry-macro.S, it also uses High Priority pending register for
> it, or I am wrong?
> 2.Anything I miss for this?
Yes. This ML is for u-boot mainline, and you are clearly using other
sources. The board in u-boot is name
On 02/16/2011 06:31 PM, Reinhard Meyer wrote:
>> I'm using last u-boot, cloned from master branch yesterday.
>> Is my toolchain broken?
>
> Not sure, the driver builds fine with ARM boards.
> Maybe you need to have CONFIG_NET_MULTI set?
And the driver builds fine with beagleboard, too. Do you dr
On Thu, 17 Feb 2011 11:09:04 +0100
Stefano Babic wrote:
> And the driver builds fine with beagleboard, too. Do you drop the
>
> #undef CONFIG_CMD_NET
>
> in the beagleboard configuration file ? If not, this generates exactly
> the error you report.
>
> Best regards,
> Stefano Babic
>
GOSH, I
Hi,
Le 17/02/2011 05:47, chinnathambi a écrit :
> Hai,
>
>I cant boot the board in the Beable xM board. The board is having
> processor ARM cortex A8. Please see the below error log.
>
>
>
> Texas Instruments X-Loader 1.4.4ss (Aug 19 2010 - 02:49:27)
>
> Beagle xM Rev A
>
> Reading boo
Hi Sandeep,
Le 16/02/2011 22:15, s-paul...@ti.com a écrit :
> From: Sandeep Paulraj
>
> This commit updates the mach-types based on the latest
> in linus's head
Ah, telepathy at last! :)
> -#define MACH_TYPE_SUEN32255
> +#define MACH_TYPE_KM_KIRKWOOD 2255
> -#define
Hi David,
Le 16/02/2011 16:15, Schade, David a écrit :
> Hi Albert,
>
> Thank you for your reply.
>
> I also tried the U-Boot version for beagleboard, which comdes from
> git://www.denx.de/git/u-boot.git;protocol=git with revision
> ca6e1c136ddb720c3bb2cc043b99f7f06bc46c55 and a lot of patch files
On 02/17/2011 11:48 AM, jacopo mondi wrote:
> GOSH, I've exactly searched through the code for CONFIG_CMD_NET, but I
> did not noticed was an undef statment instead of a define!
> Everything's fine now. Thank you.
Your're welcome.
>
> Just another question. I've studied the linux enc28j60 driver
Hi Stefano,
The entry-macrio.S I check is from linux i.MX51 kernel.
Since i.MX51 don't use interrupt in u-boot.
2011/2/17 Stefano Babic :
> On 02/17/2011 09:04 AM, arden jay wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Question:
>> 1. from entry-macro.S, it also uses High Priority pending register for
>> it, or I am w
Hi,
Le 16/02/2011 09:54, Po-Yu Chuang a écrit :
> From: Po-Yu Chuang
>
> get_sp() was incorrectly excluded if none of
>CONFIG_SETUP_MEMORY_TAGS
>CONFIG_CMDLINE_TAG
>CONFIG_INITRD_TAG
>CONFIG_SERIAL_TAG
>CONFIG_REVISION_TAG
> were defined.
Which board exactly requires this pat
Hi,
2011/2/17 Albert ARIBAUD :
> Hi,
>
> Le 16/02/2011 09:54, Po-Yu Chuang a écrit :
>> From: Po-Yu Chuang
>>
>> get_sp() was incorrectly excluded if none of
>> CONFIG_SETUP_MEMORY_TAGS
>> CONFIG_CMDLINE_TAG
>> CONFIG_INITRD_TAG
>> CONFIG_SERIAL_TAG
>> CONFIG_REVISION_TAG
>> were de
Hi,
does U-Boot already support loading the kernel of a UbiFS or YAFFS2
partition? I've built U-Boot 2010.09 for an Atmel at91sam9260ek_nandflash
board and I've seen that there are some ubi sources included but the U-Boot
binary does not offer any ubi related commands, such as ubifsload.
Similia
V2:
- put the PHY reset/init code on a proper place, so now
in the config file PHY reset could be enabled/disabled
if nRST signal is not long enough.
Signed-off-by: Asen Dimov
---
board/ronetix/pm9g45/pm9g45.c | 50 +++--
include/configs/pm9g45.h |5
On 02/17/2011 02:08 PM, Thorsten Mühlfelder wrote:
> Hi,
>
> does U-Boot already support loading the kernel of a UbiFS or YAFFS2
> partition? I've built U-Boot 2010.09 for an Atmel at91sam9260ek_nandflash
> board and I've seen that there are some ubi sources included but the U-Boot
> binary does
I agree, it does seem like a DDR issue.
I commented out the code below because it seemed unnecessary and I was able to
get into board_init_r. Problem now is that the first 3 instructions of
board_init_r are all 0, so it crashes there. I looked around in memory and
this problem is all over t
Hi
I'm trying to adjust u-boot to our board which is using a P2020.
I'm having strange effects with the stack in the L1 data cache,
during the NAND phase as well as in the SPL main u-boot.
Sometimes when a value is written to the cache this value itself
shows up correctly. However it's possible t
Hello,
What bootargs should I pass to have a JTAG preloaded initramfs in SDRAM
be used by a booting Linux (2.6.32) kernel
for an Android boot system?
My platform is an OMAP3530. I would like to have the initramfs in SDRAM
versus the MMC/SD card, as is typical
with a Beagleboard running
Dear "Boswell, Patrick",
In message <0e62bbf85af134469094eb502ce90a321ea...@tampa202em.se.sypris.com>
you wrote:
>
> What bootargs should I pass to have a JTAG preloaded initramfs in SDRAM
> be used by a booting Linux (2.6.32) kernel
This is a Linux question, not an U-oot one, so you are actual
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 10:00 AM, Alden, Kevin wrote:
> I have a custom board based on the Freescale P2020 RDB. I am having trouble
> getting through the entire boot sequence. Basically, I can't get a
> breakpoint to hit in board_init_r.
What version of u-boot are you using? Do you have DDR2
Dear All,
I have a question about u-boot. Can u-boot alone can bring up a board
and load a OS image on to board?
Does u-boot require any additional programs (like a Flash Loader) to
run, initially?
Regards,
Srinidhi.
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@list
>
> Hi Sandeep,
>
> Le 16/02/2011 22:15, s-paul...@ti.com a écrit :
> > From: Sandeep Paulraj
> >
> > This commit updates the mach-types based on the latest
> > in linus's head
>
> Ah, telepathy at last! :)
>
> > -#define MACH_TYPE_SUEN32255
> > +#define MACH_TYPE_KM_KIRKW
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 09:38:23AM -0500, Boswell, Patrick wrote:
> What bootargs should I pass to have a JTAG preloaded initramfs in SDRAM
> be used by a booting Linux (2.6.32) kernel for an Android boot system?
Unless I'm misunderstanding your question, you can convert your
initramfs image into
Hi Srinidhi,
Le 17/02/2011 17:03, Srinidhi M a écrit :
> Dear All,
>
> I have a question about u-boot. Can u-boot alone can bring up a board
> and load a OS image on to board?
>
> Does u-boot require any additional programs (like a Flash Loader) to
> run, initially?
Either question can be answere
Le 17/02/2011 13:54, Macpaul Lin a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> 2011/2/17 Albert ARIBAUD:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Le 16/02/2011 09:54, Po-Yu Chuang a écrit :
>>> From: Po-Yu Chuang
>>>
>>> get_sp() was incorrectly excluded if none of
>>> CONFIG_SETUP_MEMORY_TAGS
>>> CONFIG_CMDLINE_TAG
>>> CONFIG_INITRD_TAG
>
Hi Po-Yu Chang,
Le 16/02/2011 09:54, Po-Yu Chuang a écrit :
> From: Po-Yu Chuang
>
> get_sp() was incorrectly excluded if none of
>CONFIG_SETUP_MEMORY_TAGS
>CONFIG_CMDLINE_TAG
>CONFIG_INITRD_TAG
>CONFIG_SERIAL_TAG
>CONFIG_REVISION_TAG
> were defined.
>
> Signed-off-by: Po-Yu Ch
Le 17/02/2011 17:27, Paulraj, Sandeep a écrit :
>
>
>>
>> Hi Sandeep,
>>
>> Le 16/02/2011 22:15, s-paul...@ti.com a écrit :
>>> From: Sandeep Paulraj
>>>
>>> This commit updates the mach-types based on the latest
>>> in linus's head
>>
>> Ah, telepathy at last! :)
>>
>>> -#define MACH_TYPE_SUEN
Online Burotatigkeit im eigenen Home Office! Hierbei handelt es sich um einen
selbststandigen Job, den Sie von zu Hause online am PC oder jedem anderen Ort
mit
Internetzugang bei flexibler Zeiteinteilung ausuben konnen.
Bitte nicht verwechseln mit einer "Heimarbeit" (keine Vertretertatigkeit,
Hi,
2011/2/16 Simon Glass :
> Driver originally written by NVIDIA Corporation, modified to
> handle odd-length packets.
>
> Signed-off-by: Simon Glass
> ---
> drivers/usb/eth/Makefile | 3 +
> drivers/usb/eth/asix.c | 635
> +++
> drivers/usb/
Hi,
2011/2/16 Simon Glass :
> This adds support for using USB Ethernet dongles in host mode. This is just
> the framework - drivers will come later. A new config option called
> CONFIG_USB_HOST_ETHER can be defined in board config files to switch this
> on.
>
> The was originally written by NVIDIA
Hi,
2011/2/11 Vitaly Kuzmichev :
> Disconnecting USB gadget with pending interrupt may cause its wrong
> handling in the next time when interface will be started again
> (especially actual for RNDIS). This interrupt may force the gadget
> to queue unexpected response before setup stage.
> Despite
Hi,
2011/2/11 Vitaly Kuzmichev :
> Port struct net_device_stats and statistics collecting needed for
> RNDIS protocol.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vitaly Kuzmichev
> ---
> drivers/usb/gadget/ether.c | 41 +++
> include/linux/netdevice.h | 65
> +++
Hi,
2011/2/11 Vitaly Kuzmichev :
> Signed-off-by: Vitaly Kuzmichev
> ---
> drivers/usb/gadget/ether.c | 70 ++-
> 1 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/gadget/ether.c b/drivers/usb/gadget/ether.c
> index 8aa6240.
Dear Srinidhi M,
In message you
wrote:
>
> I have a question about u-boot. Can u-boot alone can bring up a board
> and load a OS image on to board?
Yes, it can.
> Does u-boot require any additional programs (like a Flash Loader) to
> run, initially?
No, it does not.
At least in general. In
Hi Reinhard,
2011/2/5 Remy Bohmer :
> Since U-boot v2010.12 the support for the at91sam9261ek board is broken.
> This patch solves this issue. This change has been tested on this board.
>
> Note: It requires that the 1st stage bootloader (like Atmel at91-bootstrap)
> to load U-boot at a different
Hi Reinhard,
2011/2/5 Remy Bohmer :
> Also removes CONFIG_AT91_LEGACY related stuff.
>
> Signed-off-by: Remy Bohmer
> ---
> V1: This patch contains everything to make the boards work again on
> the current changes in the u-boot-atmel.git tree.
> It requires the mainstream fixes to be app
On Wed, 2011-02-16 at 19:58 +0100, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Haiying Wang,
>
> In message <1297881643.1977.28.camel@haiying-laptop> you wrote:
> >
> > > We have some 524 PowerPC configurations in boards.cfg, and the compare
> > > must be done for _all_ off these, i. e. there are 2 x 524 pairs of
Designation: Non-SSA/Finmeccanica
Has anyone seen the patch for the bug that DDR2 autocalibration hangs on
460EX (Canyonland and other) boards?
Thanks
Larry
3.1.0805
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-b
Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam
---
arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/mx25/generic.c |2 +-
board/karo/tx25/tx25.c|4 ++--
2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/mx25/generic.c
b/arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/mx25/generic.c
index c6e1146..150eb69
On Thu, 2011-02-17 at 14:28 -0500, Haiying Wang wrote:
> >
> Your scripts works fine. Now I only get one pair of diff which are
> System.map.mpc7448hpc2.diff u-boot.map.mpc7448hpc2.diff, because
> mpc7448hpc2 failed to build:
> "
> Configuring for mpc7448hpc2 board...
> cc1: error: AltiVec and E5
Le 16/02/2011 12:58, Fabio Estevam a écrit :
> Hi Albert,
>
> On 2/13/2011 12:43 PM, Magnus Lilja wrote:
>> On 02/12/2011 08:07 AM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
>>> Le 11/02/2011 19:58, Magnus Lilja a écrit :
Hi
I've tested Fabio's patch series and it makes the i.MX31 PDK boot nicely
Hi Wolfgang,
The following changes since commit efb063390d2d1e712c2c8110911616244d562c4b:
add checking the CONFIG_ENV_IS_IN_SPI_FLASH in Enbedded env
(2011-02-15 22:09:50 +0100)
are available in the git repository at:
git://www.denx.de/git/u-boot-arm.git master
Alexander Stein (1):
Hi All,
I'm looking at removing the following, last remaining, line from config.mk
of the eNET board:
LDPPFLAGS += -DFLASH_SIZE=0x4
This is needed to allow the calculation of the location of the reset vector
so it resided in the last 16 bytes of the boot flash.
Looking at how the compilatio
> >
> >
> >>
> >> Hi Sandeep,
> >>
> >> Le 16/02/2011 22:15, s-paul...@ti.com a écrit :
> >>> From: Sandeep Paulraj
> >>>
> >>> This commit updates the mach-types based on the latest
> >>> in linus's head
> >>
> >> Ah, telepathy at last! :)
> >>
> >>> -#define MACH_TYPE_SUEN32
Le 17/02/2011 23:28, Paulraj, Sandeep a écrit :
>
>
>>>
>>>
Hi Sandeep,
Le 16/02/2011 22:15, s-paul...@ti.com a écrit :
> From: Sandeep Paulraj
>
> This commit updates the mach-types based on the latest
> in linus's head
Ah, telepathy at last! :)
>>
Dear Albert ARIBAUD,
In message <4d5da3d7.6030...@free.fr> you wrote:
>
> Because the merge window is closed and thus, only patches that were
> submitted initially before closure, or bug fixes, can go into master
> right now.
I think we should make sure that the upcoming release uses a somewhat
Le 17/02/2011 23:47, Wolfgang Denk a écrit :
> Dear Albert ARIBAUD,
>
> In message<4d5da3d7.6030...@free.fr> you wrote:
>>
>> Because the merge window is closed and thus, only patches that were
>> submitted initially before closure, or bug fixes, can go into master
>> right now.
>
> I think we sho
Dear Remy Bohmer,
I saw your request for review and have some (little) comments which may be
pointed out by Reinhard too.
Am 05.02.2011 um 13:43 schrieb Remy Bohmer:
> Since U-boot v2010.12 the support for the at91sam9261ek board is broken.
> This patch solves this issue. This change has been t
Dear Remy Bohmer,
some more comments on that patchset.
Am 05.02.2011 um 13:43 schrieb Remy Bohmer:
> Also removes CONFIG_AT91_LEGACY related stuff.
>
> Signed-off-by: Remy Bohmer
> ---
> V1: This patch contains everything to make the boards work again on
> the current changes in the u-boot
Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam
---
arch/arm/cpu/arm1136/start.S |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/arm1136/start.S b/arch/arm/cpu/arm1136/start.S
index bab2868..a05d36d 100644
--- a/arch/arm/cpu/arm1136/start.S
+++ b/arch/arm/cpu/arm1136/start.S
@
From: Po-Yu Chuang
Also add API declarations.
Signed-off-by: Po-Yu Chuang
---
v2:
move include/ftpmu010.h to include/faraday/ftpmu010.h
drivers/power/ftpmu010.c |2 +-
drivers/power/ftpmu010.h | 146 --
include/faraday/ftpmu010.h | 150 +++
From: Po-Yu Chuang
ftpmu010 related code has been moved to drivers/power/.
Signed-off-by: Po-Yu Chuang
---
v2:
remove unused local variable oscc
include/ftpmu010.h -> include/faraday/ftpmu010.h
arch/arm/cpu/arm920t/a320/timer.c | 23 +++
include/configs/a320evb.h
Hi Albert,
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 1:23 AM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
> Le 17/02/2011 13:54, Macpaul Lin a écrit :
>> 2011/2/17 Albert ARIBAUD:
>>> Le 16/02/2011 09:54, Po-Yu Chuang a écrit :
From: Po-Yu Chuang
get_sp() was incorrectly excluded if none of
CONFIG_SETUP_MEMORY_TA
Le 18/02/2011 06:42, Po-Yu Chuang a écrit :
> Hi Albert,
>
> On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 1:23 AM, Albert ARIBAUD
> wrote:
>> Le 17/02/2011 13:54, Macpaul Lin a écrit :
>>> 2011/2/17 Albert ARIBAUD:
Le 16/02/2011 09:54, Po-Yu Chuang a écrit :
> From: Po-Yu Chuang
>
> get_sp() was inco
Le 17/02/2011 21:49, Albert ARIBAUD a écrit :
> Hi Wolfgang,
>
> The following changes since commit efb063390d2d1e712c2c8110911616244d562c4b:
>
> add checking the CONFIG_ENV_IS_IN_SPI_FLASH in Enbedded env
> (2011-02-15 22:09:50 +0100)
Wolfgang,
Please hold the pull for now.
I have added two
Hi Larry,
On Thursday 17 February 2011 20:22:18 Ciummo, Larry (DS-1) wrote:
> Designation: Non-SSA/Finmeccanica
>
> Has anyone seen the patch for the bug that DDR2 autocalibration hangs on
> 460EX (Canyonland and other) boards?
No. Do you experience any DDR2 related problems on Canyonlands?
Che
Dear All,
We did not find the support for ARM940T architecture in the u-boot sources.
Is there any ARM cores which are equivalent to ARM940T? Do we need to
modify any existing ARM core files to support ARM940T?
Regards,
Srinidhi.
___
U-Boot mailing list
Dear Andreas Bießmann, Remy Bohmer,
>
> I saw your request for review and have some (little) comments which may be
> pointed out by Reinhard too.
Thank you for helping me out. I have a few further "recommendations":
>
> Am 05.02.2011 um 13:43 schrieb Remy Bohmer:
>
>> Since U-boot v2010.12 the s
Dear Andreas Bießmann, Dear Remy Bohmer,
>
> some more comments on that patchset.
>
> Am 05.02.2011 um 13:43 schrieb Remy Bohmer:
>
>> Also removes CONFIG_AT91_LEGACY related stuff.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Remy Bohmer
>> ---
>> V1: This patch contains everything to make the boards work again on
>>
Le 18/02/2011 01:27, Fabio Estevam a écrit :
> Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam
> ---
> arch/arm/cpu/arm1136/start.S |2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/arm1136/start.S b/arch/arm/cpu/arm1136/start.S
> index bab2868..a05d36d 100644
> --- a/arch
61 matches
Mail list logo
