Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 3/3 v2] powerpc/p2040: Add various p2040 specific information

2011-01-17 Thread Kumar Gala
On Jan 13, 2011, at 4:53 AM, Kumar Gala wrote: > Add P2040 SoC specific information: > * SERDES Table > * Added p2040 to cpu_type_list and SVR list > * Added number of LAWs for p2040 > * Set CONFIG_MAX_CPUS to 4 for p2040 > > Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala > --- > * Fixed commit message > * Added so

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3] powerpc/85xx: Move RESET_VECTOR_ADDRESS into config.h

2011-01-17 Thread Kumar Gala
On Jan 17, 2011, at 5:55 PM, Kumar Gala wrote: > Rather than defining it config.mk we can set it in config.h and remove > config.mk from several boards that don't need it. > > We mimic what 4xx does and introduce CONFIG_RESET_VECTOR_ADDRESS for > config.h to set. > > Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] mpq101: initial support for Mercury Computer Systems MPQ101 board

2011-01-17 Thread Kumar Gala
On Jan 17, 2011, at 4:38 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Dear Alex Dubov, > > In message <369392.26813...@web37607.mail.mud.yahoo.com> you wrote: >>> >>> Could you please be a bit more specific, i. e. like quoting >>> file names >>> and line numbers? >>> >> >> These were produced by >> grep -nr d

[U-Boot] (no subject)

2011-01-17 Thread Kumar Gala
The following changes since commit e1ccf97c5d7651664d37c0c5aa243874b8851b2d: Merge branch 'master' of git://git.denx.de/u-boot-mpc85xx (2011-01-17 20:31:46 +0100) are available in the git repository at: git://git.denx.de/u-boot-mpc85xx master Haiying Wang (1): 8xxx/ddr: add support t

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v5] mpq101: initial support for Mercury Computer Systems MPQ101 board

2011-01-17 Thread Kumar Gala
On Jan 17, 2011, at 1:26 AM, Alex Dubov wrote: > > +/* > + * Merury Computers MPQ101 board configuration file > + * > + */ > +#ifndef __CONFIG_H > +#define __CONFIG_H > + > +#ifdef CONFIG_36BIT > +# define CONFIG_PHYS_64BIT 1 > +#endif > + > +/* High Level Configuration Options */ > +#define CON

Re: [U-Boot] Memset 0 in heap initialization?

2011-01-17 Thread Dirk Behme
On 09.12.2010 17:14, Dirk Behme wrote: > > In common/dlmalloc.c in the heap initialization mem_malloc_init() [1] > it looks like the whole heap is initialized with zero: > > memset((void *)mem_malloc_start, 0, size); > > What's the reason for doing this? I know that the .bss segment has to > be zer

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 7/8] armv7: adapt omap3 to the new cache maintenance framework

2011-01-17 Thread Aneesh V
Dear Wolfgang, On Tuesday 18 January 2011 03:25 AM, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Dear Aneesh V, > > In message<4d2b1a90.9030...@ti.com> you wrote: >> +struct __attribute__ ((__packed__)) emu_hal_params { + u32 num_params; + u32 param1; +}; >>> >>> Why exactly do we need the "__att

Re: [U-Boot] Memset 0 in heap initialization?

2011-01-17 Thread Kumar Gala
On Jan 17, 2011, at 11:17 PM, Dirk Behme wrote: > On 09.12.2010 17:14, Dirk Behme wrote: >> >> In common/dlmalloc.c in the heap initialization mem_malloc_init() [1] >> it looks like the whole heap is initialized with zero: >> >> memset((void *)mem_malloc_start, 0, size); >> >> What's the reaso

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v4 5/8] mxc_i2c: add support for MX53 processor

2011-01-17 Thread Heiko Schocher
Hello Wolfgang, Wolfgang Denk schrieb: > In message <4d2d78b1.9090...@denx.de> you wrote: >> On 01/04/2011 09:27 AM, Jason Liu wrote: >>> This patch add I2C support for Freescale MX53 processor >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Jason Liu >>> >>> --- >>> Changes for v2: >>> -address the comments of Heiko, ad

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v4 7/8] imximage: Add MX53 boot image support

2011-01-17 Thread Stefano Babic
On 01/17/2011 11:54 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > > Stefano, Albert - I apologize for the late review. Please don't pull > this into mainline as is. Wolfgang, it is too late, it was already pulled. We need now a patch on top of this. Jason, can you check Wolfgang's comments and send a patch to fi

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 1/1] ARM: */start.S: code cleanup

2011-01-17 Thread Andreas Bießmann
Dear Jason Liu, Dear Albert Aribaud, Am 17.01.2011 um 20:54 schrieb Jason Liu: > Hi, Albert, > > 2010/12/23 Jason Liu : >> Remove the useless code from start.S >> >> Signed-off-by: Jason Liu >> >> --- >> Changes for v2: >> -Address the comments from Albert to make changes to all >> ARM cpus

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] spi: add support SuperH SPI module

2011-01-17 Thread Yoshihiro Shimoda
Hi, Iwamatsu-san, Thank you for your review. 2011/01/17 19:28, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote: > Hi, Shioda-san. > > 2011/1/17 Yoshihiro Shimoda : >> +#define SPI_TBR0x00 >> +#define SPI_RBR0x00 >> +#define SPI_CR10x08 >> +#define SPI_CR20

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/2] net: sh_eth: add support for SH7757's ETHER

2011-01-17 Thread Yoshihiro Shimoda
Hi, Iwamatsu-san, 2011/01/17 19:59, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote: > Hi, Shimoda-san. > > On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 01:09:23PM +0900, Yoshihiro Shimoda wrote: < snip > >> +val = 0x0; > > Is this change necessary? Oh, this is not necessary. >> /* Check if full duplex mode is supported by the ph

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] sh: add support for sh7757lcr board

2011-01-17 Thread Yoshihiro Shimoda
Hi, Iwamatsu-san, Thank you for your review! 2011/01/17 21:50, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote: >> +LDSCRIPT = $(OBJTREE)/board/$(BOARDDIR)/u-boot.lds >> +#sinclude $(OBJTREE)/board/$(BOARDDIR)/config.tmp >> + > > Is this nesseary? The "#sinclude" is not nessesary. I will remove it. However the "LDSCRIP

<    1   2