[U-Boot] [PATCH v2] video: cfb_console: add weak default video_set_lut()

2010-06-12 Thread Anatolij Gustschin
Do not enforce drivers to provide empty video_set_lut() if they do not implement indexed color (8 bpp) frame buffer support. Add default function to the cfb_console driver and remove empty video_set_lut() functions. Signed-off-by: Anatolij Gustschin --- v2: - unfortunately in the first patch vide

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] video: cfb_console: add weak default video_set_lut()

2010-06-12 Thread Anatolij Gustschin
On Sat, 12 Jun 2010 10:20:06 +0200 Anatolij Gustschin wrote: > Do not enforce drivers to provide empty video_set_lut() > if they do not implement indexed color (8 bpp) frame > buffer support. Add default function to the cfb_console > driver and remove empty video_set_lut() functions. > > Signed-

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/3] video: sm501: add support for SM501 chips on PCI bus

2010-06-12 Thread Anatolij Gustschin
On Wed, 26 May 2010 10:38:57 +0200 Anatolij Gustschin wrote: > Signed-off-by: Anatolij Gustschin > --- > drivers/video/sm501.c | 89 > ++--- > include/pci_ids.h |1 + > 2 files changed, 85 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) Applied to u-boot-vi

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/3] video: sm501.c: add weak default functions

2010-06-12 Thread Anatolij Gustschin
On Wed, 26 May 2010 10:38:58 +0200 Anatolij Gustschin wrote: > For boards using sm501/sm502 on PCI bus some driver > functions normaly defined in the board code are not > needed and empty. Provide weak default functions for > them and do not enforce board code to define empty > functions. > > Si

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH V2 1/3] arm: Add support for MB86R0x SoCs

2010-06-12 Thread Anatolij Gustschin
Hi Matthias, On Wed, 5 May 2010 16:28:51 +0200 Matthias Weisser wrote: > This patch adds support for MB86R0x SoCs from Fujitsu > > Signed-off-by: Matthias Weisser > --- > arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/mb86r0x/Makefile | 47 ++ > arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/mb86r0x/reset.c | 40 ++ >

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH V2 2/3] video: add support for display controller in MB86R0x SoCs

2010-06-12 Thread Anatolij Gustschin
Hi Matthias, On Wed, 5 May 2010 16:28:52 +0200 Matthias Weisser wrote: > This patch adds support for the display controller in > the MB86R0x SoCs. > > Signed-off-by: Matthias Weisser > --- > drivers/video/Makefile |1 + > drivers/video/mb86r0xgdc.c | 186 > +

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH V2 3/3] arm: Add support for jadecpu board based on MB86R01 SoC

2010-06-12 Thread Anatolij Gustschin
Hi Matthias, On Wed, 5 May 2010 16:28:53 +0200 Matthias Weisser wrote: > This patch adds support for the jadecpu board using the > MB86R01 'Jade' SoC from Fujitsu. > > Signed-off-by: Matthias Weisser > --- > MAINTAINERS |4 + > MAKEALL

[U-Boot] u-boot 2010 - devkit8000 issue

2010-06-12 Thread JaimeR
Hello I have a clone of beagleboard (devkit8000) I update the u-boot from 2009-11 to 2010 version. I use a set of scripts to boot based on autoboot method. The thing is, now I can not boot and hangs at kernel loading. I've tested several kernels provided by manufacturer, linux-omap-2.6, some oth

[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2] NAND: show manufacturer and device ID for unknown chips

2010-06-12 Thread Florian Fainelli
When the NAND part is not supported, it is useful to show the manufacturer and device ID to help debugging and reporting. Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli --- diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c index 7171bdd..c1657de 100644 --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c +

[U-Boot] [PATCH 2/2] NAND: add Toshiba TC58NVG0 identifier

2010-06-12 Thread Florian Fainelli
The Toshiba TC58NVG0* parts are 128Mbytes x 8 bits 3.3V parts with the 0xD1 identifier. Add these to the list of known devices IDs. Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli --- diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_ids.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_ids.c index 077c305..25b22ec 100644 --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/2] NAND: add Toshiba TC58NVG0 identifier

2010-06-12 Thread Florian Fainelli
The Toshiba TC58NVG0* parts are 128Mbytes x 8 bits 3.3V parts with the 0xD1 identifier. Add these to the list of known devices IDs. Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli --- diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_ids.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_ids.c index 077c305..25b22ec 100644 --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_

[U-Boot] [PATCH] smc91xx_eeprom: Correct chip detection check.

2010-06-12 Thread Juergen Kilb
From: Juergen Kilb The smc911x_detect function in /net/driver/net/smc911x.c returns a 0 if everything was ok (a chip was found) and -1 else. In the standalone example 'smc911x_eeprom' the return value of smc911x_detect is interpreted in a different way (0 for error, !0 as OK). This leads to the e

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] serial: atmel_usart: insert watchdog petting during putc() and tstc()

2010-06-12 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 10:57 AM, Nicolas Ferre wrote: > --- a/drivers/serial/atmel_usart.c > +++ b/drivers/serial/atmel_usart.c > @@ -80,7 +80,8 @@ void serial_putc(char c) >        if (c == '\n') >                serial_putc('\r'); > > -       while (!(usart3_readl(CSR) & USART3_BIT(TXRDY))) ; >

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] smc91xx_eeprom: Correct chip detection check.

2010-06-12 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 3:22 PM, Juergen Kilb wrote: > The smc911x_detect function in /net/driver/net/smc911x.c > returns a 0 if everything was ok (a chip was found) and -1 else. > In the standalone example 'smc911x_eeprom' the return value > of smc911x_detect is interpreted in a different way > (0

Re: [U-Boot] Micrel Controller KSZ8841-16MBL

2010-06-12 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 3:18 PM, Ben Warren wrote: > Huh? drivers/net/phy does exist...  But the KS8841 is a MAC/PHY, so > belongs in driver/net proper. unrelated, but the current phy/ subdir isnt a phylib setup like linux, right ? -mike ___ U-Boot maili

Re: [U-Boot] Micrel Controller KSZ8841-16MBL

2010-06-12 Thread Ben Warren
On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 7:35 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 3:18 PM, Ben Warren wrote: > > Huh? drivers/net/phy does exist... But the KS8841 is a MAC/PHY, so > > belongs in driver/net proper. > > unrelated, but the current phy/ subdir isnt a phylib setup like linux, > right