Mike Frysinger about -delete:
> i didnt suggest that because it isnt POSIX. it'll break on BSD systems which
> typically ship with sh*t userland tools.
Actually, I just copied the above line with "-name *" and stuff
because I know there are portability issues I'm not aware of.
Actually, Git blame
I try to port U-Boot 2009.11 to s3c2440, something success. as follows:
U-Boot 2009.11 ( 2��月 05 2010 - 23:46:51)
DRAM: 64 MB
Flash: 2 MB
NAND: NAND_ECC_NONE selected by board driver. This is not recommended !!
64 MiB
In:serial
Out: serial
Err: serial
Net: dm9000
---
Hi All,
I can compile u-boot for rsk7203_config.
But into the file board/renesas/rsk7203/config.mk
TEXT_BASE = 0x0C7C
and if I read u-boot.srec that is the result of building process I see that
the address spce of the code is starting from 0x0C7C
On my board I have 32 bit SDRAM at such
Dear kevin.morfitt
2009/12/29 kevin.morf...@fearnside-systems.co.uk
:
> Changes the names of the s3c24x0 register struct members from upper-case
> to lower-case.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kevin Morfitt
> ---
>
> checkpatch.pl reports no errors. MAKEALL ARM9 reports no new warnings
> or errors.
>
> Note
Hi Minkyu
On 06/02/2010 12:18, Minkyu Kang wrote:
> Dear kevin.morfitt
>
> 2009/12/29 kevin.morf...@fearnside-systems.co.uk
> :
>> Changes the names of the s3c24x0 register struct members from upper-case
>> to lower-case.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Kevin Morfitt
>> ---
>>
>> checkpatch.pl reports no err
Dear Alessandro Rubini,
In message <20100206080636.ga24...@morgana.gnudd.com> you wrote:
> Mike Frysinger about -delete:
> > i didnt suggest that because it isnt POSIX. it'll break on BSD systems
> > which
> > typically ship with sh*t userland tools.
>
> Actually, I just copied the above line w
Dear linzhavon,
In message <9c4bdd041002060104k2ff29a02mfffa83c15b70a...@mail.gmail.com> you
wrote:
> I try to port U-Boot 2009.11 to s3c2440, something success. as follows:
>
> U-Boot 2009.11 ( 2=EF=BF=BD=EF=BF=BD=E6=9C=88 05 2010 - 23:46:51)
>
> DRAM: 64 MB
> Flash: 2 MB
> NAND: NAND_ECC_N
Dear Fabio Giovagnini,
In message <201002061124.41572.fabio.giovagn...@aurion-tech.com> you wrote:
>
> I can compile u-boot for rsk7203_config.
> But into the file board/renesas/rsk7203/config.mk
>
> TEXT_BASE = 0x0C7C
>
> and if I read u-boot.srec that is the result of building process I se
Jens Scharsig wrote:
> * add's the new temporary CONFIG_AT91_LEGACY to all board configs
> This will need for backward compatiblity, while change the SoC access
> to c structures. If CONFIG_AT91_LEGACY is defined, the deprecated
> SoC is used.
>
>
> Signed-off-by: Jens Scharsig
This looks go
Dear Minkyu Kang,
In message <1f3430fb1002060418ydd28583sb6051dd1517fa...@mail.gmail.com> you
wrote:
>
> > Changes the names of the s3c24x0 register struct members from upper-case
> > to lower-case.
...
> Sorry for late reply.
> I tried to review your patch series,
> but your patch is too confus
Dear "kevin.morf...@fearnside-systems.co.uk",
In message <4b6d687f.2060...@fearnside-systems.co.uk> you wrote:
>
> The patches are split so that each patch makes only one type of change,
> so there's only one thing that needs to be checked in each patch.
>
> - patches 1 and 2 only make white-spac
Hi Wolfgang
On 06/02/2010 14:26, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear "kevin.morf...@fearnside-systems.co.uk",
>
> In message<4b6d687f.2060...@fearnside-systems.co.uk> you wrote:
>>
>> The patches are split so that each patch makes only one type of change,
>> so there's only one thing that needs to be che
kevin.morf...@fearnside-systems.co.uk wrote:
> Hi Wolfgang
>
> On 06/02/2010 14:26, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
>> Dear "kevin.morf...@fearnside-systems.co.uk",
>>
>> In message<4b6d687f.2060...@fearnside-systems.co.uk> you wrote:
>>> The patches are split so that each patch makes only one type of chang
Dear Wolfgang,
for sure my borad is not an rsk 7203, being my board designed by me; but I
followed the rsk 7203 schematics to connect NOR Flash, SDRAM, ETH, and NAND
Flash.
As on my own board, as on rsk board NOR flash in on CS0.
So I think I am miss understanding something.
1) Does u-boot a sort
On 06/02/2010 15:14, Tom wrote:
> kevin.morf...@fearnside-systems.co.uk wrote:
>> Hi Wolfgang
>>
>> On 06/02/2010 14:26, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
>>> Dear "kevin.morf...@fearnside-systems.co.uk",
>>>
>>> In message<4b6d687f.2060...@fearnside-systems.co.uk> you wrote:
The patches are split so t
kevin.morf...@fearnside-systems.co.uk wrote:
>
>
> On 06/02/2010 15:14, Tom wrote:
>> kevin.morf...@fearnside-systems.co.uk wrote:
>>> Hi Wolfgang
>>>
>>> On 06/02/2010 14:26, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Dear "kevin.morf...@fearnside-systems.co.uk",
In message<4b6d687f.2060...@fearnside-s
On 06/02/2010 16:35, Tom wrote:
> kevin.morf...@fearnside-systems.co.uk wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 06/02/2010 15:14, Tom wrote:
>>> kevin.morf...@fearnside-systems.co.uk wrote:
Hi Wolfgang
On 06/02/2010 14:26, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear "kevin.morf...@fearnside-systems.co.uk",
>
>
Hi all,
I'd like to link u-boot putting the code into my nor flash; the variables into
on chip (sh2a 7203) ram; where do need to put got section, u_boot_cmd ? In
ram or in flash?
Sorry but I'm new of u-boot and os based boards.
Best regards
--
Fabio Giovagnini
Aurion s.r.l.
CF e P.IVA 0088
kevin.morf...@fearnside-systems.co.uk wrote:
>
>
> On 06/02/2010 16:35, Tom wrote:
>> kevin.morf...@fearnside-systems.co.uk wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 06/02/2010 15:14, Tom wrote:
kevin.morf...@fearnside-systems.co.uk wrote:
> Hi Wolfgang
>
> On 06/02/2010 14:26, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Dear "kevin.morf...@fearnside-systems.co.uk",
In message <4b6d8128.5000...@fearnside-systems.co.uk> you wrote:
>
> > I think this should be merged into a single patch.
>
> OK. It'll be about 140K though so I'llput it on a web site.
Just post it. I will check and eventually ACK it.
> OK, it's q
Dear Fabio Giovagnini,
please read http://www.netmeister.org/news/learn2quote.html - don't
top post / full quote, please.
In message <201002061654.11412.fabio.giovagn...@aurion-tech.com> you wrote:
>
> for sure my borad is not an rsk 7203, being my board designed by me; but I
> followed the rsk
Dear Tom,
In message <4b6d9a3d.5090...@windriver.com> you wrote:
>
> > It was done automatically using Lindent but I had to do some manual
> > tidying up because Lindent doesn't always get things right.
>
> Maybe a good way to spit the patch is
> 1. Lindent
> 2. Manual
> So reviewer could spend m
I'm porting current u-boot to a board similar to EP9315A, so I'm using
arm/master as a basis, as it includes the patches by Matthias
Kaehlcke. I'm currently running from RAM (SKIP_LOWLEVEL_INIT), after
setting up sdram and pll elsewhere (older vendor u-boot code, still to
be ported).
"fix syscon_
The structure was missing a reserved entry (not listed in the manual,
actually), so the last registers had a wrong offset. This prevented
all swlocked registers to be modified as swlock is last in the structure.
Signed-off-by: Alessandro Rubini
---
include/asm-arm/arch-ep93xx/ep93xx.h |3 ++-
Previous code compiled with gcc-4.2.2 makes a call to
__aeabi_uidiv to divide by 20. As a side effect it was
not inline any more, and so sdram_cfg used the stack
as well, but this is early code that has no stack yet.
The patch explicitly removes the division, so no stack is used.
The calculation o
printf goes to uart1, but it will block forever waiting for
busy to go off unless the uart is enabled first.
Signed-off-by: Alessandro Rubini
---
board/edb93xx/edb93xx.c |6 ++
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/board/edb93xx/edb93xx.c b/board/edb93xx/edb93xx.
Hi Alessandro,
El Sat, Feb 06, 2010 at 08:53:30PM +0100 Alessandro Rubini ha dit:
> I'm porting current u-boot to a board similar to EP9315A, so I'm using
> arm/master as a basis, as it includes the patches by Matthias
> Kaehlcke. I'm currently running from RAM (SKIP_LOWLEVEL_INIT), after
> sett
El Sat, Feb 06, 2010 at 08:53:43PM +0100 Alessandro Rubini ha dit:
> The structure was missing a reserved entry (not listed in the manual,
> actually), so the last registers had a wrong offset. This prevented
> all swlocked registers to be modified as swlock is last in the structure.
>
> Signed-o
El Sat, Feb 06, 2010 at 08:53:54PM +0100 Alessandro Rubini ha dit:
> Previous code compiled with gcc-4.2.2 makes a call to
> __aeabi_uidiv to divide by 20. As a side effect it was
> not inline any more, and so sdram_cfg used the stack
> as well, but this is early code that has no stack yet.
> The
Hi Alessandro,
El Sat, Feb 06, 2010 at 08:54:05PM +0100 Alessandro Rubini ha dit:
> printf goes to uart1, but it will block forever waiting for
> busy to go off unless the uart is enabled first.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alessandro Rubini
> ---
> board/edb93xx/edb93xx.c |6 ++
> 1 files chang
725233: PLD instructions executed with PLD data forwarding
enabled can result in a processor deadlock
Signed-off-by: Siarhei Siamashka
---
cpu/arm_cortexa8/omap3/board.c |6 ++
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/cpu/arm_cortexa8/omap3/board.c b/cpu/arm_cortexa
Setting ASA bit hurts performance for the code which has lots of I-cache
misses and there are no Cortex-A8 errata workarounds which would require
to have it.
A test program which intentionally stresses I-cache misses on conditional
branches is attached.
ASA bit is not set:
real0m2.940s
user
Dirk,
On 2/5/2010 11:30 PM, Dirk Behme wrote:
> On 24.01.2010 01:05, Tom wrote:
>
>> Khasim Syed Mohammed wrote:
>>
>>>From 9bb1c3501c8f098dac6e224c99e409ebf92b0ab9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>>> From: Syed Mohammed Khasim
>>> Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2010 18:11:14 +0530
>>> Subject: [PATCH]
Siddarth,
On 1/18/2010 9:39 PM, Siddarth Gore wrote:
> Although the datasheet mentions seperate smi registers for each
> port, using Port 1 smi register to access ethernet phys does not
> work. Hence only Port 0 smi register should be used to access all
> devices connected to the smi bus. This beh
Stefano,
On 2/1/2010 5:51 AM, Stefano Babic wrote:
> The patch add support for the Freescale mx51 processor
> to the FEC ethernet driver.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stefano Babic
> ---
> drivers/net/fec_mxc.c | 73
> +---
> 1 files changed, 32 insertions(+
Stefan,
On 2/2/2010 4:43 AM, Stefan Roese wrote:
> This patch fixes a problem I've notived on a buggy PPC4xx system. This
> system has problems with the PHY MDIO communication and seemed to be
> stuck/crashed in miiphy_reset(). But degugging revealed, that the CPU
> didn't crash, but "only" hung i
Wolfgang,
The following changes since commit a1b322a98319de568b3bc38029ef7e123643c1e8:
Ladislav Michl (1):
ns16550: kick watchdog while waiting for a character
are available in the git repository at:
git://git.denx.de/u-boot-net.git master
Siddarth Gore (1):
NET: kirkwood-
37 matches
Mail list logo
