Re: [U-Boot] Pull request - net

2010-02-01 Thread Prafulla Wadaskar
> -Original Message- > From: u-boot-boun...@lists.denx.de > [mailto:u-boot-boun...@lists.denx.de] On Behalf Of Ben Warren > Sent: Monday, February 01, 2010 12:17 PM > To: Wolfgang Denk > Cc: U-Boot > Subject: [U-Boot] Pull request - net > > Wolfgang > > The following changes since com

Re: [U-Boot] Pull request - net

2010-02-01 Thread Ben Warren
Hi Prafulla, On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 12:04 AM, Prafulla Wadaskar wrote: > > > > -Original Message- > > From: u-boot-boun...@lists.denx.de > > [mailto:u-boot-boun...@lists.denx.de] On Behalf Of Ben Warren > > Sent: Monday, February 01, 2010 12:17 PM > > To: Wolfgang Denk > > Cc: U-Boot > >

[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/3] cmd_ximg.c: fix error: 'i' undeclared

2010-02-01 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Fix compile error: cmd_ximg.c: In function 'do_imgextract': cmd_ximg.c:234: error: 'i' undeclared (first use in this function) cmd_ximg.c:234: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once cmd_ximg.c:234: error: for each function it appears in.) Signed-o

[U-Boot] [PATCH 3/3] mpc5xxx/cpu_init.c: fix warning: unused variable 'cdm'

2010-02-01 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Denk --- cpu/mpc5xxx/cpu_init.c | 12 +++- 1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/cpu/mpc5xxx/cpu_init.c b/cpu/mpc5xxx/cpu_init.c index 2aa6e1c..560c9b3 100644 --- a/cpu/mpc5xxx/cpu_init.c +++ b/cpu/mpc5xxx/cpu_init.c @@ -40,12 +40,14 @@ v

[U-Boot] [PATCH 2/3] mpc5xxx/cpu_init.c: fix warning: unused variable 'gpt0'

2010-02-01 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Denk --- cpu/mpc5xxx/cpu_init.c |3 +++ 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/cpu/mpc5xxx/cpu_init.c b/cpu/mpc5xxx/cpu_init.c index b151464..2aa6e1c 100644 --- a/cpu/mpc5xxx/cpu_init.c +++ b/cpu/mpc5xxx/cpu_init.c @@ -46,9 +46,12 @@ void cpu_in

[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/1] USB: usb_control_msg wait for driver ISR to set status.

2010-02-01 Thread Daniel Hellstrom
This patch changes usb_control_msg back to the state prior to commit 48867208444cb2a82e2af9c3249e90b7ed4a1751. The USB driver ISR routine may update the status. Signed-off-by: Daniel Hellstrom --- common/usb.c | 21 - 1 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) diff

Re: [U-Boot] [patch 1/2 V2] fix USB initialisation procedure

2010-02-01 Thread Daniel Hellstrom
Hi, Remy Bohmer wrote: >Hi, > >2010/1/29 Daniel Hellstrom : > > >>Hello, >> >>Please see my comment on commit 48867208444cb2a82e2af9c3249e90b7ed4a1751 >>below. >> >> >>Remy Bohmer wrote: >> >> >> >>>The max packet size is encoded as 0,1,2,3 for 8,16,32,64 bytes. >>>At some places directly 8

[U-Boot] [PATCH V3 for NET] tsec: do not print Speed: if using netconsole

2010-02-01 Thread Ed Swarthout
CONFIG_NETCONSOLE on the p2020ds is functional with the tsec driver. But the printf in adjust_link() which is called by startup_tsec() called by tsec_init() in tsec.c is making it impossible to use. For example typing 12345 on the netconsole causes the message to be printed for every character:

[U-Boot] USB unaligned problem

2010-02-01 Thread Daniel Hellstrom
Hi Remy, I experience unaligned exceptions when using the USB stack in u-boot on SPARC/LEON. I believe that there are many places in the code that must be updated since many structures are declared with the GCC attribute PACKED and still use 16-bit or 32-bit fields. However, I have so far only

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH V3 for NET] tsec: do not print Speed: if using netconsole

2010-02-01 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Ed Swarthout, In message <1265019802-32030-1-git-send-email-ed.swarth...@freescale.com> you wrote: > CONFIG_NETCONSOLE on the p2020ds is functional with the tsec driver. > But the printf in adjust_link() which is called by startup_tsec() > called by tsec_init() in tsec.c is making it impos

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH V3 07/11] fec_mxc: add support for MX51 processor

2010-02-01 Thread Stefano Babic
Ben Warren wrote: > Hi Stefano, Hi Ben, > Your driver shouldn't touch the environment (i.e. no getenv/setenv > calls). Just save the value from ROM into edev->enetaddr, like this: > if (fec_get_hwaddr(edev, ethaddr) == 0) >memcpy(edev->enetaddr, ethaddr, 6); > > The core net code will take

[U-Boot] [PATCH] fsl-ddr: Fix the turnaround timing for TIMING_CFG_4

2010-02-01 Thread Dave Liu
Read-to-read/Write-to-write turnaround for same chip select of DDR3 memory, BL/2+2 cycles is enough for these turnarounds. Cutting down the turnaround from BL/2+4 to BL/2+2 will improve the memory performance. Signed-off-by: Dave Liu --- cpu/mpc8xxx/ddr/ctrl_regs.c |6 +++--- 1 files changed

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] EXBITGEN: drop support for unmaintained board

2010-02-01 Thread Stefan Roese
On Monday 01 February 2010 12:07:18 Wolfgang Denk wrote: > The EXBITGEN board has not been maintained for a long time; it has > build problems, but no hardware is available any more for testing. > > Drop support for this board. > > Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Denk Acked-by: Stefan Roese Wolfgang,

[U-Boot] [PATCH] ppc4xx: Fix building of PMC440 board

2010-02-01 Thread Matthias Fuchs
Remove some unused features and default environment variable to shrink the PMC440 u-boot. Signed-off-by: Matthias Fuchs --- include/configs/PMC440.h |6 -- 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/configs/PMC440.h b/include/configs/PMC440.h index 6310cfc..89

[U-Boot] [PATCH] ppc4xx: Remove unused feature from AR405 board

2010-02-01 Thread Matthias Fuchs
This patch fixes building for AR405 boards by remove an unused feature. Signed-off-by: Matthias Fuchs --- include/configs/AR405.h |1 + 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/configs/AR405.h b/include/configs/AR405.h index 73e34bd..52ead43 100644 --- a/include

[U-Boot] [PATCH] ppc4xx: Fix building for PLU405 boards

2010-02-01 Thread Matthias Fuchs
The init_coupler() function from board/esd/plu405/plu405.c got lost somehow! This patch readds it. Signed-off-by: Matthias Fuchs --- board/esd/plu405/plu405.c | 28 1 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/board/esd/plu405/plu405.c b/board/es

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] EXBITGEN: drop support for unmaintained board

2010-02-01 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Stefan Roese, In message <201002011302.20381...@denx.de> you wrote: > On Monday 01 February 2010 12:07:18 Wolfgang Denk wrote: > > The EXBITGEN board has not been maintained for a long time; it has > > build problems, but no hardware is available any more for testing. > > > > Drop support fo

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] EXBITGEN: drop support for unmaintained board

2010-02-01 Thread Stefan Roese
On Monday 01 February 2010 14:40:17 Wolfgang Denk wrote: > > Wolfgang, will you apply this directly or should I push it via the ppc4xx > > repository? > > If it's OK with you, I will apply directly. Thanks. Sure, I'll drop it from my patch queue. Thanks. Cheers, Stefan -- DENX Software Enginee

[U-Boot] [PATCH V4 07/11] fec_mxc: add support for MX51 processor

2010-02-01 Thread Stefano Babic
The patch add support for the Freescale mx51 processor to the FEC ethernet driver. Signed-off-by: Stefano Babic --- drivers/net/fec_mxc.c | 73 +--- 1 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/net/fec_mxc.c b/drivers/net/

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v5 08/12] SPEAr : Support for HW mac id read/write from i2c mem

2010-02-01 Thread Tom
Ben Warren wrote: > Tom, > > Vipin KUMAR wrote: >> This patch adds the support to read and write mac id from i2c >> memory. >> For reading: >> if (env contains ethaddr) >> pick env ethaddr >> else >> pick ethaddr from i2c memory >> For writing: >> chip_config ethaddr X

Re: [U-Boot] Which all boards does C100 support in Mainline works with.

2010-02-01 Thread Minkyu Kang
Dear Naveen Krishna Ch, On 1 February 2010 15:34, Naveen Krishna Ch wrote: > Hi Folks, > > I would like to know Which all boards > are tested with the C100 support in the Mainline. > > I have a C100 Single, Pop, EVT1, EVT2, EVT0 boards > > When i build the Mainline u-boot for "smdkc100_config"; m

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 01/17] SPARC: added unaligned definitions, patch supplied by Magnus Sjalander.

2010-02-01 Thread Daniel Hellstrom
Mike Frysinger wrote: >On Thursday 28 January 2010 07:16:20 Daniel Hellstrom wrote: > > >>Signed-off-by: Daniel Hellstrom >>--- >> include/asm-sparc/unaligned.h | 17 + >> 1 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) >> create mode 100644 include/asm-sparc/unaligned.h >>

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/1] USB: usb_control_msg wait for driver ISR to set status.

2010-02-01 Thread Remy Bohmer
Hi Daniel, 2010/2/1 Daniel Hellstrom : > This patch changes usb_control_msg back to the state prior to commit > 48867208444cb2a82e2af9c3249e90b7ed4a1751. > > The USB driver ISR routine may update the status. > > Signed-off-by: Daniel Hellstrom > --- >  common/usb.c |   21 - >

Re: [U-Boot] board doesnt boot when migrating from u-boot1.3.4 to u-boot2009.11.1

2010-02-01 Thread sunr2007
> My board is based on AT91SAM9261EK. i did a couple of changes to u-boot which i'm listing below >1) In the config file /include/configs/at91sam9261ek.h i changed the line >#define PHYS_SDRAM_SIZE0x0400 /* 64 megs */ >to >#define PHYS_SDRAM_SIZE

Re: [U-Boot] USB unaligned problem

2010-02-01 Thread Remy Bohmer
Hi, 2010/2/1 Daniel Hellstrom : > Hi Remy, > > I experience unaligned exceptions when using the USB stack in u-boot on > SPARC/LEON. I believe that there are many places in the code that must be > updated since many structures are declared with the GCC attribute PACKED and > still use 16-bit or 32

[U-Boot] [PATCH 0/3] ARM: Add support for EDB93xx boards [rev6]

2010-02-01 Thread Matthias Kaehlcke
6th revision of the patch set for EDB93xx boards --- Changes with respect to rev5: board patch * fixed whitespace issues * simplified copying of exception vectors in dram_init() * added comment about programming of SDRAM mode registers * simplified definition of CONFIG_SYS_LOAD_ADDR Mat

[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/3] ARM: Add support for EP93xx SoCs

2010-02-01 Thread Matthias Kaehlcke
Add support for the Cirrus EP93xx platform Signed-off-by: Matthias Kaehlcke Acked-by: Tom --- no changes with respect to rev5 cpu/arm920t/ep93xx/Makefile | 56 cpu/arm920t/ep93xx/cpu.c | 51 +++ cpu/arm920t/ep93xx/led.c | 101 ++ cpu/arm920t/ep93

[U-Boot] [PATCH 2/3] Add EP93xx ethernet driver

2010-02-01 Thread Matthias Kaehlcke
Added ethernet driver for EP93xx SoCs Signed-off-by: Matthias Kaehlcke Acked-by: Ben Warren --- no changes with respect to rev5 drivers/net/Makefile |1 + drivers/net/ep93xx_eth.c | 653 ++ drivers/net/ep93xx_eth.h | 144 ++ includ

[U-Boot] [PATCH 3/3] Add support for EDB93xx boards

2010-02-01 Thread Matthias Kaehlcke
Added support for the following EDB93xx boards: EDB9301 EDB9302 EDB9302A EDB9307 EDB9307A EDB93012 EDB9315 EDB9315A Signed-off-by: Matthias Kaehlcke --- Changes with respect to rev5: * fixed whitespace issues * simplified copying of exception vectors in dram_init() * added comment about

[U-Boot] end-user firmware upgrade

2010-02-01 Thread Marcel
Hi, I'm using u-boot for a while now for my AVR (ap7000) project and while happy with it as a developer tool I wonder how I can make it useful for end-user firmware upgrades. The way I think about it is that end-user can never be allowed to interact directly with u-boot. It's something I don'

[U-Boot] [PATCH] ns16550: kick watchdog while waiting for a character

2010-02-01 Thread Ladislav Michl
From: Ladislav Michl ns16550 busyloops waiting for incoming byte causing watchdog to reboot while waiting for a key press. A call to WATCHDOG_RESET in NS16550_getc loop fixes it. Signed-off-by: Ladislav Michl --- diff --git a/drivers/serial/ns16550.c b/drivers/serial/ns16550.c index 2fcc8c3..b

Re: [U-Boot] Which all boards does C100 support in Mainline works with.

2010-02-01 Thread Naveen Krishna Ch
Hi Kang, On 1 February 2010 20:02, Minkyu Kang wrote: > Dear Naveen Krishna Ch, > > On 1 February 2010 15:34, Naveen Krishna Ch > wrote: > > Hi Folks, > > > > I would like to know Which all boards > > are tested with the C100 support in the Mainline. > > > > I have a C100 Single, Pop, EVT1, EVT

Re: [U-Boot] end-user firmware upgrade

2010-02-01 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Marcel, In message <201002012159.29244.korg...@home.nl> you wrote: > > I'm using u-boot for a while now for my AVR (ap7000) project and while happy > with it as a developer tool I wonder how I can make it useful for end-user > firmware upgrades. > > The way I think about it is that end-us