Re: UCLASS_BLK driver binding without devtree and U_BOOT_DEVICE

UCLASS. Can we use it? Yes I don't see why not. Regards, Simon > > Regards, > Anastasiia Lukianenko > > > > From: Simon Glass > Sent: 04 June 2020 16:00 > To: Anastasiia Lukianenko > Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de ; Oleksandr Andrushchenko > ; Volodymyr Babchuk

Re: UCLASS_BLK driver binding without devtree and U_BOOT_DEVICE

@lists.denx.de ; Oleksandr Andrushchenko ; Volodymyr Babchuk Subject: Re: UCLASS_BLK driver binding without devtree and U_BOOT_DEVICE   Hi Anastasiia, On Thu, 4 Jun 2020 at 03:06, Anastasiia Lukianenko wrote: > > Hello Simon, > Thanks for sending as plain text. > We are addin

Re: UCLASS_BLK driver binding without devtree and U_BOOT_DEVICE

Hi Anastasiia, On Thu, 4 Jun 2020 at 03:06, Anastasiia Lukianenko wrote: > > Hello Simon, > Thanks for sending as plain text. > We are adding support for Xen [1] para-virtualized block device as a u-boot > driver and have some questions with respect to driver model and > instantiation of new de

UCLASS_BLK driver binding without devtree and U_BOOT_DEVICE

Hello Simon, We are adding support for Xen [1] para-virtualized block device as a u-boot driver and have some questions with respect to driver model and instantiation of new devices. Because of the nature of the device driver we cannot use device tree or define statically the device instances befo

UCLASS_BLK driver binding without devtree and U_BOOT_DEVICE

Hello Simon, We are adding support for Xen [1] para-virtualized block device as a u-boot driver and have some questions with respect to driver model and instantiation of new devices. Because of the nature of the device driver we cannot use device tree or define statically the device instances b