Re: Thoughts about U-boot binary size increase

2024-03-28 Thread Lukasz Majewski
Hi Tom, > On Thu, Mar 28, 2024 at 01:55:22PM +0100, Lukasz Majewski wrote: > > Hi Tom, > > > > > On Thu, Mar 28, 2024 at 10:20:49AM +0100, Lukasz Majewski wrote: > > > > Dear Community, > > > > > > > > I'd like to share with you some thoughts about growth of > > > > u-boot's binary size for

Re: Thoughts about U-boot binary size increase

2024-03-28 Thread Tom Rini
On Thu, Mar 28, 2024 at 01:55:22PM +0100, Lukasz Majewski wrote: > Hi Tom, > > > On Thu, Mar 28, 2024 at 10:20:49AM +0100, Lukasz Majewski wrote: > > > Dear Community, > > > > > > I'd like to share with you some thoughts about growth of u-boot's > > > binary size for SPL and u-boot proper. > > >

Re: Thoughts about U-boot binary size increase

2024-03-28 Thread Lukasz Majewski
Hi Tom, > On Thu, Mar 28, 2024 at 10:20:49AM +0100, Lukasz Majewski wrote: > > Dear Community, > > > > I'd like to share with you some thoughts about growth of u-boot's > > binary size for SPL and u-boot proper. > > > > Board: XEA > > SoC : imx287 (still in active production) > > Problem: SPL s

Re: Thoughts about U-boot binary size increase

2024-03-28 Thread Lukasz Majewski
Hi Fabio, > Hi Lukasz, > > On Thu, Mar 28, 2024 at 6:20 AM Lukasz Majewski wrote: > > > > Dear Community, > > > > I'd like to share with you some thoughts about growth of u-boot's > > binary size for SPL and u-boot proper. > > > > Board: XEA > > SoC : imx287 (still in active production) > > Pro

Re: Thoughts about U-boot binary size increase

2024-03-28 Thread Fabio Estevam
Hi Lukasz, On Thu, Mar 28, 2024 at 6:20 AM Lukasz Majewski wrote: > > Dear Community, > > I'd like to share with you some thoughts about growth of u-boot's > binary size for SPL and u-boot proper. > > Board: XEA > SoC : imx287 (still in active production) > Problem: SPL size constrained to ~55 K

Re: Thoughts about U-boot binary size increase

2024-03-28 Thread Tom Rini
On Thu, Mar 28, 2024 at 10:20:49AM +0100, Lukasz Majewski wrote: > Dear Community, > > I'd like to share with you some thoughts about growth of u-boot's > binary size for SPL and u-boot proper. > > Board: XEA > SoC : imx287 (still in active production) > Problem: SPL size constrained to ~55 KiB

Re: Thoughts about U-boot binary size increase

2024-03-28 Thread Lukasz Majewski
Hi Marek, > On 3/28/24 10:20 AM, Lukasz Majewski wrote: > > Dear Community, > > > > I'd like to share with you some thoughts about growth of u-boot's > > binary size for SPL and u-boot proper. > > > > Board: XEA > > SoC : imx287 (still in active production) > > Problem: SPL size constrained to

Re: Thoughts about U-boot binary size increase

2024-03-28 Thread Marek Vasut
On 3/28/24 10:20 AM, Lukasz Majewski wrote: Dear Community, I'd like to share with you some thoughts about growth of u-boot's binary size for SPL and u-boot proper. Board: XEA SoC : imx287 (still in active production) Problem: SPL size constrained to ~55 KiB (This cannot be exceeded).

Thoughts about U-boot binary size increase

2024-03-28 Thread Lukasz Majewski
Dear Community, I'd like to share with you some thoughts about growth of u-boot's binary size for SPL and u-boot proper. Board: XEA SoC : imx287 (still in active production) Problem: SPL size constrained to ~55 KiB (This cannot be exceeded). Board design constraints u-boot proper size