Hi Zixun,
On lun., mars 24, 2025 at 18:33, Zixun LI wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 24, 2025 at 6:21 PM Mattijs Korpershoek
> wrote:
>> I've tried to reproduce this on master (2025.04-rc4-g244e61fbb7f5) and I
>> don't reproduce this with the VIM3 board using
>> khadas-vim3_android_ab_defconfig:
>>
>> I'l
Hi Zixun,
On jeu., mars 27, 2025 at 14:46, Mattijs Korpershoek
wrote:
> Hi Zixun, Marek,
>
> On lun., mars 24, 2025 at 18:40, Mattijs Korpershoek
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Zixun,
>>
>> On lun., mars 24, 2025 at 18:33, Zixun LI wrote:
>>
>> resetting ...
>
> [...]
>
>>
>>>
>>> Each time when ums is ca
Hi Zixun, Marek,
On lun., mars 24, 2025 at 18:40, Mattijs Korpershoek
wrote:
> Hi Zixun,
>
> On lun., mars 24, 2025 at 18:33, Zixun LI wrote:
>
> resetting ...
[...]
>
>>
>> Each time when ums is called 2*FSG_BUFLEN, 256kB buffer is allocated
>> and it seems not
>> freed as fsg_common_releas
On Mon, Mar 24, 2025 at 6:21 PM Mattijs Korpershoek
wrote:
> I've tried to reproduce this on master (2025.04-rc4-g244e61fbb7f5) and I
> don't reproduce this with the VIM3 board using
> khadas-vim3_android_ab_defconfig:
>
> I'll try to understand why it's behaving differently between the
> sam9x60
On Mon, Mar 24, 2025 at 3:12 PM Marek Vasut wrote:
> Can you reproduce this on u-boot/master too ?
Yes I can reproduce it on master 2025.04-244e61f, since fsg init/deinit code
are the same.
Hi,
Thank you for the report.
On lun., mars 24, 2025 at 15:03, Marek Vasut wrote:
> On 3/24/25 11:42 AM, Zixun LI wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I encountered a data abort on the 2nd "ums 0 mmc 0" command on
>> u-boot-at91 2024.07 with sam9x60-curiosity board.
>>
>> U-Boot> ums 0 mmc 0
>> UMS: LUN 0, de
On 3/24/25 11:42 AM, Zixun LI wrote:
Hi,
I encountered a data abort on the 2nd "ums 0 mmc 0" command on
u-boot-at91 2024.07 with sam9x60-curiosity board.
U-Boot> ums 0 mmc 0
UMS: LUN 0, dev mmc 0, hwpart 0, sector 0x0, count 0x1d29000
CTRL+C - Operation aborted
U-Boot> ums 0 mmc 0
UMS: LUN 0, d
7 matches
Mail list logo
