On Fri, 13 Jan 2017, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> Hi Michal,
>
> 2017-01-05 0:22 GMT+09:00 Michal Simek :
> > I looked at this. Correct name should be CONFIG_CMD_MX_CYCLIC and for
> > the rest s/CONFIG_MX_CYCLIC/CONFIG_CMD_MX_CYCLIC/g with move to defconfig.
> > + in Kconfig there should be dependecy
Hi Michal,
2017-01-05 0:22 GMT+09:00 Michal Simek :
> I looked at this. Correct name should be CONFIG_CMD_MX_CYCLIC and for
> the rest s/CONFIG_MX_CYCLIC/CONFIG_CMD_MX_CYCLIC/g with move to defconfig.
> + in Kconfig there should be dependecy on CMD_MEMORY.
Could you fix this please?
--
Best Re
On Wed, 4 Jan 2017, Michal Simek wrote:
... snip ...
> > so it would appear that the *correct* spelling is "CONFIG_MX_CYCLIC"
> > as defined in the header file, which is what is being tested in the
> > source file cmd/mem.c.
>
> I looked at this. Correct name should be CONFIG_CMD_MX_CYCLIC and
On Wed, 4 Jan 2017, Michal Simek wrote:
> I looked at this. Correct name should be CONFIG_CMD_MX_CYCLIC and
> for the rest s/CONFIG_MX_CYCLIC/CONFIG_CMD_MX_CYCLIC/g with move to
> defconfig.
> + in Kconfig there should be dependecy on CMD_MEMORY.
for better or worse, i ran that cleanup script a
2017-01-05 0:22 GMT+09:00 Michal Simek :
> On 4.1.2017 15:38, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
>>
>> while i'm in a chatty mood, a few years back, i wrote some simple
>> shell scripts that scanned the linux kernel source tree for
>> inconsistencies in the Kconfig files, and pointed out things like
>> "con
On 4.1.2017 15:38, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
>
> while i'm in a chatty mood, a few years back, i wrote some simple
> shell scripts that scanned the linux kernel source tree for
> inconsistencies in the Kconfig files, and pointed out things like
> "config" entries that were never used or tested, "s
6 matches
Mail list logo