Re: [U-Boot] declaring and initializing variables

2013-10-15 Thread Kim Phillips
On Mon, 14 Oct 2013 12:05:52 -0700 York Sun wrote: > On 10/07/2013 03:03 PM, Kim Phillips wrote: > > On Mon, 30 Sep 2013 17:04:33 -0700 > > York Sun wrote: > > > >> Kim, et al., > >> > >> I know I have asked this before. Pardon me as I don't consider myself a > >> savy programmer. > >> > >> I a

Re: [U-Boot] declaring and initializing variables

2013-10-14 Thread York Sun
On 10/07/2013 03:03 PM, Kim Phillips wrote: > On Mon, 30 Sep 2013 17:04:33 -0700 > York Sun wrote: > >> Kim, et al., >> >> I know I have asked this before. Pardon me as I don't consider myself a >> savy programmer. >> >> I am cleaning up the DDR driver for mpc83xx, mpc85xx and mpc86xx. The >> que

Re: [U-Boot] declaring and initializing variables

2013-10-07 Thread Kim Phillips
On Mon, 30 Sep 2013 17:04:33 -0700 York Sun wrote: > Kim, et al., > > I know I have asked this before. Pardon me as I don't consider myself a > savy programmer. > > I am cleaning up the DDR driver for mpc83xx, mpc85xx and mpc86xx. The > question is the accetable formats of declaring and initial

Re: [U-Boot] declaring and initializing variables

2013-09-30 Thread Timur Tabi
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 7:04 PM, York Sun wrote: > > struct ccsr_ddr __iomem *ddr = (void *) CONFIG_FOO_ADDR; > struct ccsr_ddr __iomem *ddr = > (struct ccsr_ddr __iomem *) CONFIG_FOO_ADDR; > > You have told me the second format is preferred. I have been using this > format since. But in p