> On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 12:23 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> > Dear Marek Vasut,
> >
> > In message <201110231646.59439.marek.va...@gmail.com> you wrote:
> >> I've been doing the debug() cleanup and found the debugX() macro is used
> >> only in very few patches. Maybe punting it altogether won't hu
On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 12:23 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Marek Vasut,
>
> In message <201110231646.59439.marek.va...@gmail.com> you wrote:
>>
>> I've been doing the debug() cleanup and found the debugX() macro is used
>> only in
>> very few patches. Maybe punting it altogether won't hurt.
>>
On Sunday, October 23, 2011 07:23:26 PM Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Marek Vasut,
>
> In message <201110231646.59439.marek.va...@gmail.com> you wrote:
> > I've been doing the debug() cleanup and found the debugX() macro is used
> > only in very few patches. Maybe punting it altogether won't hurt.
>
Dear Marek Vasut,
In message <201110231646.59439.marek.va...@gmail.com> you wrote:
>
> I've been doing the debug() cleanup and found the debugX() macro is used only
> in
> very few patches. Maybe punting it altogether won't hurt.
>
> The following do use it:
> ./board/spc1920/hpi.c
> ./drivers
4 matches
Mail list logo