Re: [U-Boot] SPL Linux Boot

2012-03-19 Thread Tom Rini
On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 02:24:42PM -0700, Tom Rini wrote: > On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 09:38:10PM +0100, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > > Dear Tom Rini, > > > > In message <20120316193030.GC31661@bill-the-cat> you wrote: > > > > > > OK, that said, I'm OK with everything so far and you had the last round > >

Re: [U-Boot] SPL Linux Boot

2012-03-17 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Tom Rini, In message you wrote: > > > See "arch/arm/config.mk", search for "For EABI, make sure to provide > > raise()". > > > > Check why arch/arm/lib/eabi_compat.c does not get compiled / linked. > > Even if ELDK5.1 is totally fine? And other modern toolchains as well.. Yes, this probl

Re: [U-Boot] SPL Linux Boot

2012-03-17 Thread Stefano Babic
On 17/03/2012 16:24, Tom Rini wrote: > On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 8:16 AM, Wolfgang Denk wrote: >> Dear Tom Rini, >> Hi Tom, >> In message <20120316212442.GE31661@bill-the-cat> you wrote: >>> >>> OK. But now we add to the ELDK 4.2 saga. This series adds not just a >>> warning (well, 5 for CONFIG_

Re: [U-Boot] SPL Linux Boot

2012-03-17 Thread Tom Rini
On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 8:16 AM, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Dear Tom Rini, > > In message <20120316212442.GE31661@bill-the-cat> you wrote: >> >> OK.  But now we add to the ELDK 4.2 saga.  This series adds not just a >> warning (well, 5 for CONFIG_OMAP I guess, 1 for everything else) for >> everything

Re: [U-Boot] SPL Linux Boot

2012-03-17 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Tom Rini, In message <20120316212442.GE31661@bill-the-cat> you wrote: > > OK. But now we add to the ELDK 4.2 saga. This series adds not just a > warning (well, 5 for CONFIG_OMAP I guess, 1 for everything else) for > everything ARM but also breaks everything else over undefined reference > t

Re: [U-Boot] SPL Linux Boot

2012-03-17 Thread stefano babic
Am 17/03/2012 05:34, schrieb Thomas Weber: > Hello, > On 03/15/2012 03:01 PM, Stefano Babic wrote: >> Hi, >> Hi Thomas, >> http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot > It applies on TI-u-boot, but TI-u-boot is still broken for Devkit8000 > (SOFT_ECC). Yes, I have the same problem, too. The com

Re: [U-Boot] SPL Linux Boot

2012-03-16 Thread Thomas Weber
Hello, On 03/15/2012 03:01 PM, Stefano Babic wrote: > Hi, > > this should be the final version for the patchset introducing > direct Linux booting from SPL. > > Only Patch 1/14: "Add cmd_spl command" was modified. > Patches 2/13 up to 12/13 are untouched from V13. > Patch 13/13 fix a small issue by

Re: [U-Boot] SPL Linux Boot

2012-03-16 Thread Tom Rini
On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 09:38:10PM +0100, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Dear Tom Rini, > > In message <20120316193030.GC31661@bill-the-cat> you wrote: > > > > OK, that said, I'm OK with everything so far and you had the last round > > of "please fix/change this" comments. Are you happy with it all now?

Re: [U-Boot] SPL Linux Boot

2012-03-16 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Tom Rini, In message <20120316193030.GC31661@bill-the-cat> you wrote: > > OK, that said, I'm OK with everything so far and you had the last round > of "please fix/change this" comments. Are you happy with it all now? We can iterate forever on improvements, or we can get it in now. Let's do

Re: [U-Boot] SPL Linux Boot

2012-03-16 Thread Tom Rini
On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 08:24:55PM +0100, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Dear Tom Rini, > > In message <20120316172653.GD4234@bill-the-cat> you wrote: > > > > > Only Patch 1/14: "Add cmd_spl command" was modified. > > > Patches 2/13 up to 12/13 are untouched from V13. > > > Patch 13/13 fix a small issue

Re: [U-Boot] SPL Linux Boot

2012-03-16 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Tom Rini, In message <20120316172653.GD4234@bill-the-cat> you wrote: > > > Only Patch 1/14: "Add cmd_spl command" was modified. > > Patches 2/13 up to 12/13 are untouched from V13. > > Patch 13/13 fix a small issue by compiling the cam_enc_4xx > > board (Tom Rini) > > My first question is,

Re: [U-Boot] SPL Linux Boot

2012-03-16 Thread Tom Rini
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 03:01:33PM +0100, Stefano Babic wrote: > Hi, > > this should be the final version for the patchset introducing > direct Linux booting from SPL. > > Only Patch 1/14: "Add cmd_spl command" was modified. > Patches 2/13 up to 12/13 are untouched from V13. > Patch 13/13 fix a

Re: [U-Boot] SPL Linux Boot

2012-02-01 Thread Stefano Babic
On 31/01/2012 15:26, Tom Rini wrote: >> A way can be to add an arch weak function to add arch specific >> initialization inside board_init_*() functions, if any. Have you seen >> other issues other what I report now ? > > That sounds about right. In short, ./MAKEALL -s arm still needs to > buil

Re: [U-Boot] SPL Linux Boot

2012-01-31 Thread Tom Rini
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 4:25 AM, Stefano Babic wrote: > On 30/01/2012 19:05, Tom Rini wrote: > > Hi Tom, > >>> OK, doing a MAKEALL for omap3/4/5/am33xx/davinci shows we've got a few >>> missing include problems, I'll go fix that up. >> >> OK, was it when you took over the series that you moved stu

Re: [U-Boot] SPL Linux Boot

2012-01-31 Thread Stefano Babic
On 30/01/2012 19:05, Tom Rini wrote: Hi Tom, >> OK, doing a MAKEALL for omap3/4/5/am33xx/davinci shows we've got a few >> missing include problems, I'll go fix that up. > > OK, was it when you took over the series that you moved stuff to > common/spl.c ? That idea is breaking, badly, non-omap p

Re: [U-Boot] SPL Linux Boot

2012-01-25 Thread Tom Rini
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 4:50 AM, Stefano Babic wrote: > Hi Tom, > > last version of patchset has not received comments since a long time - > Simon sends to me a confirm that tests on the devkit8000 are successful. > > Any chance to get the patchset merged soon or do you have any open points ? I'v

Re: [U-Boot] SPL Linux Boot

2012-01-25 Thread Stefano Babic
Hi Tom, last version of patchset has not received comments since a long time - Simon sends to me a confirm that tests on the devkit8000 are successful. Any chance to get the patchset merged soon or do you have any open points ? Thanks, Stefano -- ===

Re: [U-Boot] SPL Linux Boot

2011-12-19 Thread Tom Rini
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 1:43 AM, Stefano Babic wrote: > On 16/12/2011 16:45, Tom Rini wrote: >> On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 8:37 AM, Stefano Babic wrote: >>> Hi, >>> > > Hi Tom, > >> I'm going to mark this series as RFC in patchwork as I see you did >> +#ifneq... in some Makefiles and I know you know

Re: [U-Boot] SPL Linux Boot

2011-12-19 Thread Stefano Babic
On 16/12/2011 16:45, Tom Rini wrote: > On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 8:37 AM, Stefano Babic wrote: >> Hi, >> Hi Tom, > I'm going to mark this series as RFC in patchwork as I see you did > +#ifneq... in some Makefiles and I know you know better :) That said, > can you confirm MAKEALL -s omap3 -s omap4

Re: [U-Boot] SPL Linux Boot

2011-12-16 Thread Stefano Babic
On 16/12/2011 16:45, Tom Rini wrote: > On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 8:37 AM, Stefano Babic wrote: >> Hi, >> >> this is a new submission of the Simon's work to add a way to >> boot Linux directly from the SPL. From the last patchset series, >> the main changes introduced by me are the following: >> >> -

Re: [U-Boot] SPL Linux Boot

2011-12-16 Thread Tom Rini
On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 8:37 AM, Stefano Babic wrote: > Hi, > > this is a new submission of the Simon's work to add a way to > boot Linux directly from the SPL. From the last patchset series, > the main changes introduced by me are the following: > > - compile the cache functions in SPL to make cl