Re: [U-Boot] Problems porting new u-boot

2009-08-06 Thread Alemao
Thanks for the quick responses. Thanks for the quick responses. Actually it doesn't need to be so big, to justify use TEXT_BASE 0xfff0. Im really wasting flash memory. The problem is that in U-Boot-1.2.0, u-boot.bin gets filled, and in U-Boot-2009.03 seems that objcopy doesn't fill the right

Re: [U-Boot] Problems porting new u-boot

2009-08-06 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Jerry Van Baren, In message <4a7adcc8.9040...@ge.com> you wrote: > > Argh, some days I read. Other days... With a little training you probably can learn to read _while_ rolling your eyes :-) Best regards, Wolfgang Denk -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Z

Re: [U-Boot] Problems porting new u-boot

2009-08-06 Thread Jerry Van Baren
Jerry Van Baren wrote: > Hi Alemao, > > Alemao wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> Im having problems porting u-boot-2009.03 to a MPC8541 board. ^^^ [snip] > You did not say what processor you are using, but it sounds > like a MPC74xx or MPC86xx or MPC8

Re: [U-Boot] Problems porting new u-boot

2009-08-06 Thread Jerry Van Baren
Hi Alemao, Alemao wrote: > Hi all, > > Im having problems porting u-boot-2009.03 to a MPC8541 board. > > In u-boot-1.2.0, if I use TEXT_BASE = 0xfff0, u-boot.bin is > created with 1MB size. The .bin file is a binary image from the first location 0xfff0 *contiguously filled* to the last

Re: [U-Boot] Problems porting new u-boot

2009-08-06 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Alemao, In message you wrote: > > Im having problems porting u-boot-2009.03 to a MPC8541 board. > > In u-boot-1.2.0, if I use TEXT_BASE = 0xfff0, u-boot.bin is > created with 1MB size. Sounds like a waste of flash memoory ? > But in u-boot-2009.03 it's created with only 516kB. Look