> A 4xx FP toolchain is a perfectly good idea - that's why we
> support such a configuration in ppc_4xxFP with the ELDK. But
> it doesn't need any changes to U-Boot.
I tried building u-boot with the 4xxFP toolchain from ELDK and -
surprise, surprise - it worked.
So there is definetly somet
> This is no reason for any problems. As mentioned above, ELDK
> in the ppc_4xxFP configuration (and some others)
> support hardware FP as
> well, but works fine with U-Boot. After all, U-Boot is
> self-contained.
Sorry for bugging you again, Wolfgang.
The messages I get a
Dear Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD,
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>
> > OT: Is a 440fp toolchain with hard float a bad idea somehow? Has
> > soft-float any advantages?
>
> the best way will be to remove the -lgcc so you can build u-boot how you wish
> without depending of the toolc
Dear "Eibach, Dirk",
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>
> I built a toolchain for PowerPC 440EP nad configured it for cpu 440fp
> with hard-float.
Shouldbe working fine. The ELDK "ppc_4xxFP" packages do the same.
> Building u-boot with this toolchain failed, because there is
>
> PLAT
> the best way will be to remove the -lgcc so you can build
> u-boot how you wish without depending of the toolchains
> support of hard-float or soft-float
You mean building u-boot withou lgcc? Can you give me a clue how to do
that?
Cheers
Dirk
___
U
On 11:06 Thu 20 Nov , Eibach, Dirk wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I built a toolchain for PowerPC 440EP nad configured it for cpu 440fp
> with hard-float.
>
> Building u-boot with this toolchain failed, because there is
>
> PLATFORM_CPPFLAGS += -DCONFIG_4xx -ffixed-r2 -mstring -msoft-float
>
> in cpu
6 matches
Mail list logo
