Re: [U-Boot] Phy lib again

2009-08-26 Thread Michal Simek
Hi Ben, Ben Warren wrote: > Hi Michal, > > Michal Simek wrote: >> Hi Stefan, >> >> Stefan Roese wrote: >> >>> Hi Michal, >>> >>> On Tuesday 25 August 2009 09:02:14 Michal Simek wrote: >>> I saw you have phy lib in your branch. What is the current state? Are there any problems? W

Re: [U-Boot] Phy lib again

2009-08-25 Thread Ben Warren
Hi Michal, Michal Simek wrote: > Hi Stefan, > > Stefan Roese wrote: > >> Hi Michal, >> >> On Tuesday 25 August 2009 09:02:14 Michal Simek wrote: >> >>> I saw you have phy lib in your branch. What is the current state? >>> Are there any problems? When do you want to add to mainline? >>>

Re: [U-Boot] Phy lib again

2009-08-25 Thread Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
On 09:08 Tue 25 Aug , Stefan Roese wrote: > Hi Michal, > > On Tuesday 25 August 2009 09:02:14 Michal Simek wrote: > > I saw you have phy lib in your branch. What is the current state? > > Are there any problems? When do you want to add to mainline? > > IIRC, Jean-Christophe is also working on

Re: [U-Boot] Phy lib again

2009-08-25 Thread Michal Simek
Hi Stefan, Stefan Roese wrote: > Hi Michal, > > On Tuesday 25 August 2009 09:02:14 Michal Simek wrote: >> I saw you have phy lib in your branch. What is the current state? >> Are there any problems? When do you want to add to mainline? > > IIRC, Jean-Christophe is also working on a PHY lib imple

Re: [U-Boot] Phy lib again

2009-08-25 Thread Stefan Roese
Hi Michal, On Tuesday 25 August 2009 09:02:14 Michal Simek wrote: > I saw you have phy lib in your branch. What is the current state? > Are there any problems? When do you want to add to mainline? IIRC, Jean-Christophe is also working on a PHY lib implementation (port from the Linux version). J

Re: [U-Boot] PHY lib

2008-12-02 Thread Andy Fleming
On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 12:31 PM, Ben Warren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Michal, > Michal Simek wrote: >> Hi Ben, >> >> how does look like your propose work about PHY lib? >> >> Thanks, >> Michal >> >> > I'd like to have the PHY library included in the 02.2009 release. One > of the things I'm

Re: [U-Boot] PHY lib

2008-11-25 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Wolfgang, In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > > > BTW - Wolfgang: do you still plan to rebase & post your "Configure > > U-Boot with a Device Tree" patches? They must have grown out of sync > > terribly? > > Well, not really. The patch providing access to the FDT is quite simple,

Re: [U-Boot] PHY lib

2008-11-25 Thread Wolfgang Grandegger
Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Dear Ben, > > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: >> I'd like to have the PHY library included in the 02.2009 release. One > > v2009.02, that is :-) > >> If we pulled all board info from a device tree, as people were talking >> about a few months ago, this would b

Re: [U-Boot] PHY lib

2008-11-25 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Ben, In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > > I'd like to have the PHY library included in the 02.2009 release. One v2009.02, that is :-) > If we pulled all board info from a device tree, as people were talking > about a few months ago, this would be easy and scalable. I don't know

Re: [U-Boot] PHY lib

2008-11-25 Thread Ben Warren
Hi Michal, Michal Simek wrote: > Hi Ben, > > how does look like your propose work about PHY lib? > > Thanks, > Michal > > I'd like to have the PHY library included in the 02.2009 release. One of the things I'm struggling with is how so specify MDIO busses and PHY addresses. For example, is i