Hello Tom,
On Fri, 30 Jan 2015 11:09:48 -0500, Tom Rini wrote:
> But I expect MAINTAINERS to do
> some sort of sanity test at least once every few releases, especially
> since we have a regular release cycle.
How about Bcc:ing all maintainers upon each release announcement to
the list?
> --
>
On Friday 30 January 2015 17:09:48 Tom Rini wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 03:49:08PM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > On Friday 30 January 2015 15:19:53 Tom Rini wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 10:26:36AM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > > > Generic board with #define CONFIG_SYS_GENERIC_BOARD is
>
On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 03:49:08PM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
> On Friday 30 January 2015 15:19:53 Tom Rini wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 10:26:36AM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > > Generic board with #define CONFIG_SYS_GENERIC_BOARD is
> > > working fine. There is no visible difference between le
On Friday 30 January 2015 15:19:53 Tom Rini wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 10:26:36AM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > Generic board with #define CONFIG_SYS_GENERIC_BOARD is
> > working fine. There is no visible difference between legacy
> > and generic board code.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Pali Rohár
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 10:26:36AM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
> Generic board with #define CONFIG_SYS_GENERIC_BOARD is working fine.
> There is no visible difference between legacy and generic board code.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pali Rohár
> Acked-by: Pavel Machek
Applied to u-boot-ti/master, thanks!
5 matches
Mail list logo